RI: Collins is the no. 2

Monkeydad · 09-06-2007, 04:31 PM

It would definitely make the opposition's game planning and prep difficult.

I don't think the option would work in the NFL though. Defenders are too fast for it, at least it wouldn't work as an offense like in college, it could work if run just occasionally.

4mrusmc · 09-06-2007, 08:15 PM

In my opinion, I don't like it, but what do I know. I still think MB is a better option AFTER JC.

MTK · 09-06-2007, 04:44 PM

Palmer was a project pick anyway and no real threat to even make the team. I think the hope was he would show enough to be worth sticking on the practice squad and he proved to not even be worth that.

offiss · 09-06-2007, 05:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mattyk72

Palmer was a project pick anyway and no real threat to even make the team. I think the hope was he would show enough to be worth sticking on the practice squad and he proved to not even be worth that.

Unfortunately I believe your right.

Hog1 · 09-06-2007, 05:13 PM

I would just like to know one thing. Since Collins, has replaced the "prayer mongering" Brunell, does that mean Joe2 and Collins are attending Choir practice together now?

Redskins_P · 09-06-2007, 05:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hog1

I would just like to know one thing. Since Collins, has replaced the "prayer mongering" Brunell, does that mean Joe2 and Collins are attending Choir practice together now?

What does religion have to do w/ this? :confused:

Hog1 · 09-06-2007, 05:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Redskins_P

What does religion have to do w/ this? :confused:

Apparently, you are not up to speed on the usual BS as to why Brunell was still the starter last season? To answer your question, religion has nothing to do with any of it. Many people here did not seem to understand that.

chrisl4064 · 09-06-2007, 07:05 PM

collins couldnt win a game for us if we played michigan.....

Monkeydad · 09-07-2007, 10:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chrisl4064

collins couldnt win a game for us if we played michigan.....

Actually, their QB now does have a better arm than Collins. Sad.

chrisl4064 · 09-06-2007, 07:09 PM

i think we could possibly sitting on one of the worst QB situations in the league and most of it is because we keep hanging on to this bum collins.

JoeRedskin · 09-06-2007, 07:31 PM

From just a back up consideration and off the top of my head - I would take our back-ups over any of the following teams:

Cleveland
Oakland
Miami
Baltimore
Jacksonville
Seattle
Kansas City
Tampa
Atlanta
Minnesota
Detroit
New York Giants

While that still is in the bottom half, I don't know all the back-ups throughout the league and would bet their are a couplle more teams I could add to this list.

SmootSmack · 09-06-2007, 08:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JoeRedskin

From just a back up consideration and off the top of my head - I would take our back-ups over any of the following teams:

Cleveland
Oakland
Miami
Baltimore
Jacksonville
Seattle
Kansas City
Tampa
Atlanta
Minnesota
Detroit
New York Giants

While that still is in the bottom half, I don't know all the back-ups throughout the league and would bet their are a couplle more teams I could add to this list.

I'll add Indy to that list. Unless there's something about Jim Sorgi we're just not seeing

JoeRedskin · 09-06-2007, 07:37 PM

So tell me, if you could switch our back-ups with any teams who would they be?
Not the specific QB's but the TEAMS and back-ups ONLY!

SmootSmack · 09-06-2007, 08:21 PM

I think much more important is to have depth on the O-Line. With 5 linemen versus just 1 QB on the field at any time, you're 5 times more likely to see a starting lineman go down. We need to make sure we have depth on the line to protect Campbell and not worry about Collins or Brunell.

And I think we've done a really good job building depth on the line.

Hog1 · 09-07-2007, 02:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SmootSmack

I think much more important is to have depth on the O-Line. With 5 linemen versus just 1 QB on the field at any time, you're 5 times more likely to see a starting lineman go down. We need to make sure we have depth on the line to protect Campbell and not worry about Collins or Brunell.

And I think we've done a really good job building depth on the line.

Nice!
Way to overlooked point in the QB battle. We don't need a great QB to have a GREAT performance. Just ask Rypien. Great line and avg QB=Great QB performance

09-06-2007, 04:31 PM	#1
Monkeydad Living Legend Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: PA Age: 46 Posts: 17,460	Re: RI: Collins is the no. 2 It would definitely make the opposition's game planning and prep difficult. I don't think the option would work in the NFL though. Defenders are too fast for it, at least it wouldn't work as an offense like in college, it could work if run just occasionally.

09-06-2007, 08:15 PM	#2
4mrusmc Impact Rookie Join Date: Apr 2005 Age: 56 Posts: 559	Re: RI: Collins is the no. 2 In my opinion, I don't like it, but what do I know. I still think MB is a better option AFTER JC.

09-06-2007, 04:44 PM	#3
MTK Hail Raiser Join Date: Feb 2004 Age: 53 Posts: 100,038	Re: RI: Collins is the no. 2 Palmer was a project pick anyway and no real threat to even make the team. I think the hope was he would show enough to be worth sticking on the practice squad and he proved to not even be worth that. __________________ Support The Warpath! \| Warpath Shop

09-06-2007, 05:13 PM	#5
Hog1 Quietly Dominating the East Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Naples, Florida Posts: 10,675	Re: RI: Collins is the no. 2 I would just like to know one thing. Since Collins, has replaced the "prayer mongering" Brunell, does that mean Joe2 and Collins are attending Choir practice together now? __________________ Goodbye Sean..........Vaya Con Dios thankyou Joe....... *“God made certain people to play football. He was one of them.” – Joe Gibbs*

09-06-2007, 07:05 PM	#8
chrisl4064 Registered User Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: Lake Travis, Texas Age: 45 Posts: 786	Re: RI: Collins is the no. 2 collins couldnt win a game for us if we played michigan.....

09-06-2007, 07:09 PM	#10
chrisl4064 Registered User Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: Lake Travis, Texas Age: 45 Posts: 786	Re: RI: Collins is the no. 2 i think we could possibly sitting on one of the worst QB situations in the league and most of it is because we keep hanging on to this bum collins.

09-06-2007, 07:31 PM	#11
JoeRedskin Contains football related knowledge Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: Second Star On The Right Age: 63 Posts: 10,401	Re: RI: Collins is the no. 2 From just a back up consideration and off the top of my head - I would take our back-ups over any of the following teams: Cleveland Oakland Miami Baltimore Jacksonville Seattle Kansas City Tampa Atlanta Minnesota Detroit New York Giants While that still is in the bottom half, I don't know all the back-ups throughout the league and would bet their are a couplle more teams I could add to this list. __________________ Strap it up, hold onto the ball, and let’s go.

09-06-2007, 07:37 PM	#13
JoeRedskin Contains football related knowledge Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: Second Star On The Right Age: 63 Posts: 10,401	Re: RI: Collins is the no. 2 So tell me, if you could switch our back-ups with any teams who would they be? Not the specific QB's but the TEAMS and back-ups ONLY! __________________ Strap it up, hold onto the ball, and let’s go.

09-06-2007, 08:21 PM	#14
SmootSmack Uncle Phil Join Date: Feb 2004 Posts: 45,256	Re: RI: Collins is the no. 2 I think much more important is to have depth on the O-Line. With 5 linemen versus just 1 QB on the field at any time, you're 5 times more likely to see a starting lineman go down. We need to make sure we have depth on the line to protect Campbell and not worry about Collins or Brunell. And I think we've done a really good job building depth on the line. __________________ You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

RI: Collins is the no. 2

Locker Room Main Forum