Post your NFC East predictions here!

[Ruhskins]

Originally Posted by GTripp0012

I don't think it can. In two contests between the Eagles and Cowboys, you have 1 win, and 3 losses.

I agree that when the Cowboys and Eagles get together, no one wins, but this is probably a little too literal

Maybe there will be a tie. LOL.

[RedskinFanForever]

Originally Posted by RedskinFanForever

Redskins:16-0
Giants:2-14
Eagles:1-15
Cowpokes:0-16

This isn't going to happen(except for the Redskins hopefully) but it would be nice to see it happen, wouldn't it?

This is my real prediction:

Cowboys:13-3[Get on a roll, but stumble the last few games, one and done in playoffs-thanks to Romo ]
Redskins:12-4[Start off slow but we pick up speed as the season ends]
Giants:9-7 to 6-10[Lost key leaders in Strahan and Shockey, Stumble through season]
Eagles:6-10 or worse[Once again McNabb gets hurt(and adding insult to injury ) only to have Westbrook follow and the team crumbles]

[troy]

WITH JASON CAMPBELL

cowboys 11-5
giants 10-6
philadelphia 8-8
redskins 6-10

WITHOUT JASON CAMPBELL

redskins 12-4
cowboys 11-5
giants 10-6
philadelphia 8-8

alot of you will disagree but FACT is with jason campbell as our starting quarterback we are a losing football team

[SkinzzFan]

Originally Posted by troy

WITH JASON CAMPBELL

cowboys 11-5
giants 10-6
philadelphia 8-8
redskins 6-10

WITHOUT JASON CAMPBELL

redskins 12-4
cowboys 11-5
giants 10-6
philadelphia 8-8

alot of you will disagree but FACT is with jason campbell as our starting quarterback we are a losing football team

Seriously? I respect your opinion, but I think you're WAY off here. He played in an offense last year that was constantly battling itself (Gibbs and Saunders). Let's at least give Campbell a chance to prove himself in an offense that IMO is better suited his talent.

[Ruhskins]

Originally Posted by troy

WITH JASON CAMPBELL

cowboys 11-5
giants 10-6
philadelphia 8-8
redskins 6-10

WITHOUT JASON CAMPBELL

redskins 12-4
cowboys 11-5
giants 10-6
philadelphia 8-8

alot of you will disagree but FACT is with jason campbell as our starting quarterback we are a losing football team

Sooo ur saying that we'll go 12-4 with Todd Collins? Have you seen him play??

[DarkKnight]

Originally Posted by troy

WITH JASON CAMPBELL

cowboys 11-5
giants 10-6
philadelphia 8-8
redskins 6-10

WITHOUT JASON CAMPBELL

redskins 12-4
cowboys 11-5
giants 10-6
philadelphia 8-8

alot of you will disagree but FACT is with jason campbell as our starting quarterback we are a losing football team

and let the Todd and Colt talk begin...........under what??????? never mind

[JLW428]

Originally Posted by troy

WITH JASON CAMPBELL

cowboys 11-5
giants 10-6
philadelphia 8-8
redskins 6-10

WITHOUT JASON CAMPBELL

redskins 12-4
cowboys 11-5
giants 10-6
philadelphia 8-8

alot of you will disagree but FACT is with jason campbell as our starting quarterback we are a losing football team

That's the dumbest thing I've ever heard. JC is the best QB we have. I would like to have this conversation again in week 8. I would be willing to bet that you are wrong. $$$?

[jsarno]

Originally Posted by troy

WITH JASON CAMPBELL

cowboys 11-5
giants 10-6
philadelphia 8-8
redskins 6-10

WITHOUT JASON CAMPBELL

redskins 12-4
cowboys 11-5
giants 10-6
philadelphia 8-8

alot of you will disagree but FACT is with jason campbell as our starting quarterback we are a losing football team

Wow, I can understand that you aren't high on Campbell, but to say that Collins or Brennan are 6 games better...well, I believe there is a straightjacket with your name on it.
Even if we had Peyton Manning as our backup, that would not translate into 6 more wins for just 1 person.
About Campbell, we certainly saw some growing pains last year, but I think he's going to surprise you.

About predictions:
Redskins 11-5
Cowpatties 10-6
Giants 9-7
Eagles 7-9

[MTK]

Originally Posted by jsarno

Wow, I can understand that you aren't high on Campbell, but to say that Collins or Brennan are 6 games better...well, I believe there is a straightjacket with your name on it.
Even if we had Peyton Manning as our backup, that would not translate into 6 more wins for just 1 person.
About Campbell, we certainly saw some growing pains last year, but I think he's going to surprise you.

About predictions:
Redskins 11-5
Cowpatties 10-6
Giants 9-7
Eagles 7-9

I'll give you credit for even responding to that post with anything other than: RETARDED POST

[memphisskin]

Cowboys 10-6 *Camp Marshmallow strikes early, Boys rebound late (4 of last 6 at home)
Eagles 10-6 *McNabb back fully, plus they get the Falcons at the link
Giants 8-8 *They will be the hunted this year
Redskins 6-10 *Growing pains

[sandtrapjack]

Originally Posted by memphisskin

Cowboys 10-6 *Camp Marshmallow strikes early, Boys rebound late (4 of last 6 at home)
Eagles 10-6 *McNabb back fully, plus they get the Falcons at the link
Giants 8-8 *They will be the hunted this year
Redskins 6-10 *Growing pains

I think that is way to conservative an estimate for the NFC East teams.

We are all playing the NFC West and the AFC North this season. Those are not 2 divisions that you can label as "power houses" like the NFC East. The BEST record from 2007 from those 2 divisions is 10-6, and 5 of those 8 teams finished the regular season at .500 or worse. Only 2 of those teams made the post season, because they won thier respective divisions.

Now if the NFC East were playing the AFC South this season I would agree with you.

But other than the disparity between road vs home games and placement of team bye weeks, this is really a cake schedule for the NFC East. Once again our main opposition will come from within our own division.

[memphisskin]

Originally Posted by sandtrapjack

I think that is way to conservative an estimate for the NFC East teams.

We are all playing the NFC West and the AFC North this season. Those are not 2 divisions that you can label as "power houses" like the NFC East. The BEST record from 2007 from those 2 divisions is 10-6, and 5 of those 8 teams finished the regular season at .500 or worse. Only 2 of those teams made the post season, because they won thier respective divisions.

Now if the NFC East were playing the AFC South this season I would agree with you.

But other than the disparity between road vs home games and placement of team bye weeks, this is really a cake schedule for the NFC East. Once again our main opposition will come from within our own division.

I can see your point about the performance of those divisions last year, but I don't see this year playing out like last year for either those divisions or our own. I like history too, like the time the Rams went from worst to first and won a Super Bowl ('99). Point being, last year's results are often times only that, last year's results. Plus, those divisions have some stout defenses, and playing defense gives you a chance. I think Cleveland, Pittsburgh, Seattle, Arizona and Baltimore each have a good shot at beating Dallas. the 49ers are a long shot, but I like Mike Nolan, love Patrick Willis, and think Frank Gore and Mike Martz will get the offense to the middle of the pack. I don't see any team in our division downing that sixpack.

I was conservative, but I went through each team's schedule and that's what I saw. I tried to not be a homer, to objectively look at the schedule. I really undersold the Skins, but that is because I don't think we did a good enough job at filling the holes we had last year.

I think the Cowboys won't win as many games as last year, simply because they won 13 games last year and still didn't win in the playoffs. This year I think they take a little off the throttle in the regular season in an effort to win a playoff game. There's a lot of pressure on the folks in Dallas, is Wade the kind of coach to handle that?

[MiraclesHappen07]

Originally Posted by sandtrapjack

I think that is way to conservative an estimate for the NFC East teams.

We are all playing the NFC West and the AFC North this season. Those are not 2 divisions that you can label as "power houses" like the NFC East. The BEST record from 2007 from those 2 divisions is 10-6, and 5 of those 8 teams finished the regular season at .500 or worse. Only 2 of those teams made the post season, because they won thier respective divisions.

Now if the NFC East were playing the AFC South this season I would agree with you.

But other than the disparity between road vs home games and placement of team bye weeks, this is really a cake schedule for the NFC East. Once again our main opposition will come from within our own division.

I would say no matter what division we play, the NFC East is always going to be our toughtest. It always is, thats why NFC east is dubbed as the toughest division in the NFL. Look at last year, three teams from the East went to the playoffs.

[D'BOYZ]

Originally Posted by MiraclesHappen07

I would say no matter what division we play, the NFC East is always going to be our toughest. It always is, that's why NFC east is dubbed as the toughest division in the NFL. Look at last year, three teams from the East went to the playoffs.

I can Agree we are the toughest division in the NFL right now and the 90's but from the late 90's and early 00's this division was as soft as a marshmallow we didn't scared anything.

Let's get real when the best thing the division had to offer is the Eagles you don't have a very though division to begin with.

[sandtrapjack]

Originally Posted by MiraclesHappen07

I would say no matter what division we play, the NFC East is always going to be our toughtest. It always is, thats why NFC east is dubbed as the toughest division in the NFL. Look at last year, three teams from the East went to the playoffs.

Although I concur with you, folks from the AFC South might have an arguement on that. That division also sent 3 teams to the post season last year. Indy, Jacksonville and Tennessee.