Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Durant Brooks Venting Thread

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-15-2008, 03:57 PM   #1
celts32
Playmaker
 
celts32's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Hackettstown NJ
Age: 55
Posts: 2,665
Re: Durant Brooks Venting Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk72 View Post
The punt coverage really was the main problem on the Bush return. I think it may have been the ballhawk Horton that I noticed got sealed off inside and didn't stick with his lane.
I don't know Matt...I had a nice view of that punt from good old section 419and it was very low...a total line drive. The coverage didn't have a chance to get down the field by the time Bush had the ball. But when i watch the TV copy later I will take a look at Horton on that play.

Anyway, I already said earlier in the thread that I wanted Brooks to get the job so I am not bailing on him. He will eventually improve. And the fans at the game need to stop booing that kid...it is not helping him get better.
__________________
Section 116 Row 19

“Goal line, goal line. I-left, tight wing, 70 chip on white.”

www.facebook.com/HackettstownBeerClub
celts32 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-15-2008, 03:59 PM   #2
MTK
Hail Raiser
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 100,121
Re: Durant Brooks Venting Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by celts32 View Post
I don't know Matt...I had a nice view of that punt from good old section 419and it was very low...a total line drive. The coverage didn't have a chance to get down the field by the time Bush had the ball. But when i watch the TV copy later I will take a look at Horton on that play.

Anyway, I already said earlier in the thread that I wanted Brooks to get the job so I am not bailing on him. He will eventually improve. And the fans at the game need to stop booing that kid...it is not helping him get better.
The TV angle is pretty good, there was simply no outside contain and Bush bounced to the outside and took advantage of it.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-15-2008, 04:08 PM   #3
celts32
Playmaker
 
celts32's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Hackettstown NJ
Age: 55
Posts: 2,665
Re: Durant Brooks Venting Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk72 View Post
The TV angle is pretty good, there was simply no outside contain and Bush bounced to the outside and took advantage of it.
I saw that there was no outside contain...but when the punt comes out that low it f's everything up. I guess we can agree that there was plenty of screwing up to go around on that play!
__________________
Section 116 Row 19

“Goal line, goal line. I-left, tight wing, 70 chip on white.”

www.facebook.com/HackettstownBeerClub
celts32 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2008, 10:26 AM   #4
Monkeydad
Living Legend
 
Monkeydad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: PA
Age: 47
Posts: 17,460
Re: Durant Brooks Venting Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk72 View Post
The punt coverage really was the main problem on the Bush return. I think it may have been the ballhawk Horton that I noticed got sealed off inside and didn't stick with his lane.
The punt was a line drive to Bush. They had no chance to even get down the field. Reggie was able to field the punt and had enough time and distance to find holes. They weren't at fault on a shanked punt.
__________________
Not sent from a Droid, iPhone, Blackberry or toaster
Monkeydad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-15-2008, 02:52 PM   #5
skins6
Camp Scrub
 
skins6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 24
Re: Durant Brooks Venting Thread

Brooks Has Been A Major Disapointment.
skins6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-15-2008, 04:48 PM   #6
Paintrain
Pro Bowl
 
Paintrain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Age: 56
Posts: 5,006
Re: Durant Brooks Venting Thread

B-Mitch put it all on Brooks, saying the coverage team had no shot if it's a low, short line drive like that..

Brooks has been a disappointment for 2 games, Frost was a disappointment for 4 years! Does anyone think the light bulb was magically going to come on this year? Sir Shank-a-lot was good for a 46 yard punt when you were near mid-field in a 7-0 game, but he was really great at shanking a 27 yarder in the 4th quarter when we needed to pin our opponent deep.

I'm fine with some growing pains with Brooks if he makes the transition over the long haul.
__________________
Paintrain's Redskins Fandom
1981-2014

I'm not dead but this team is dead to me...but now that McCloughan is here they may have new life!

Jay Gruden = Zorny McSpurrier
Kirk Cousins = Next Grossman
Paintrain is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-15-2008, 04:51 PM   #7
celts32
Playmaker
 
celts32's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Hackettstown NJ
Age: 55
Posts: 2,665
Re: Durant Brooks Venting Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by Paintrain View Post
B-Mitch put it all on Brooks, saying the coverage team had no shot if it's a low, short line drive like that..

Brooks has been a disappointment for 2 games, Frost was a disappointment for 4 years! Does anyone think the light bulb was magically going to come on this year? Sir Shank-a-lot was good for a 46 yard punt when you were near mid-field in a 7-0 game, but he was really great at shanking a 27 yarder in the 4th quarter when we needed to pin our opponent deep.

I'm fine with some growing pains with Brooks if he makes the transition over the long haul.
Absolutely...and I know it's a PK and not a punter but does anyone remember when the skins pulled the plug on David Akers over a couple bad kicks?
__________________
Section 116 Row 19

“Goal line, goal line. I-left, tight wing, 70 chip on white.”

www.facebook.com/HackettstownBeerClub
celts32 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-15-2008, 04:54 PM   #8
Paintrain
Pro Bowl
 
Paintrain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Age: 56
Posts: 5,006
Re: Durant Brooks Venting Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by celts32 View Post
Absolutely...and I know it's a PK and not a punter but does anyone remember when the skins pulled the plug on David Akers over a couple bad kicks?
Yeah, that decision didn't come back to screw us for the past 10 years did it?!?!?
__________________
Paintrain's Redskins Fandom
1981-2014

I'm not dead but this team is dead to me...but now that McCloughan is here they may have new life!

Jay Gruden = Zorny McSpurrier
Kirk Cousins = Next Grossman
Paintrain is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2008, 12:06 PM   #9
MTK
Hail Raiser
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 100,121
Re: Durant Brooks Venting Thread

A line drive punt doesn't excuse crappy coverage.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2008, 08:59 PM   #10
4mrusmc
Impact Rookie
 
4mrusmc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Age: 57
Posts: 559
Re: Durant Brooks Venting Thread

I still don't know why we deploy a punter to hold for field goals. It doesn't seem right. I mean, what if you want to try for a fake field goal. To me, it seems you would have better success with a back-up qb than someone who punts the football. It's also another way to get your back-up qb in the game, and experience real-time game situations.
__________________
Put'n bodies in motion, cuz I got the notion.
Fresh for 88' you suckaz.
4mrusmc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2008, 10:15 PM   #11
EternalEnigma21
Assistant Regional Mod
 
EternalEnigma21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Carbondale CO
Age: 46
Posts: 2,958
Re: Durant Brooks Venting Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by 4mrusmc View Post
I still don't know why we deploy a punter to hold for field goals. It doesn't seem right. I mean, what if you want to try for a fake field goal. To me, it seems you would have better success with a back-up qb than someone who punts the football. It's also another way to get your back-up qb in the game, and experience real-time game situations.

because in practice and training camp when the offense is running you want your backup running the backup offense or watching and participating with the offense, not working on special teams. I don't see why this is so hard for everyone to understand. A kicker needs to practice too. A kicker needs a holder. Why pull a guy who's one injury away from LEADING the offense, and practically the team, away from learning the offense to hold for the freaking kicker...

Its much smarter that special teams guys practice as much as they can together, especially in this age of the specialists.
__________________
I am the brute squad.
EternalEnigma21 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-18-2008, 02:16 PM   #12
4thGenRedskin21
Registered User
 
4thGenRedskin21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 164
Re: Durant Brooks Venting Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by EternalEnigma21 View Post
because in practice and training camp when the offense is running you want your backup running the backup offense or watching and participating with the offense, not working on special teams. I don't see why this is so hard for everyone to understand. A kicker needs to practice too. A kicker needs a holder. Why pull a guy who's one injury away from LEADING the offense, and practically the team, away from learning the offense to hold for the freaking kicker...

Its much smarter that special teams guys practice as much as they can together, especially in this age of the specialists.
how did tony romo manage to start and hold ??????????????? hmmmmmmm???????
4thGenRedskin21 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-18-2008, 02:28 PM   #13
EternalEnigma21
Assistant Regional Mod
 
EternalEnigma21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Carbondale CO
Age: 46
Posts: 2,958
Re: Durant Brooks Venting Thread

Quote:
Originally Posted by 4thGenRedskin21 View Post
how did tony romo manage to start and hold ??????????????? hmmmmmmm???????
I never said everyone does it, i just explained the logic that seemed to evade a few people, but thanks for your insightful comment.
__________________
I am the brute squad.
EternalEnigma21 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-18-2008, 01:03 PM   #14
PennSkinsFan
Impact Rookie
 
PennSkinsFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Age: 56
Posts: 752
Re: Durant Brooks Venting Thread

Hope I don't eat my words, but I full anticipate Brooks booming the hell out of the ball this week.
__________________
DC Pro Sports Report - Home of the Internet's Largest NFL Mock Draft Database. Best Redskins Redskins discussion, theWarpath.net

PennSkinsFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-18-2008, 02:17 PM   #15
4thGenRedskin21
Registered User
 
4thGenRedskin21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 164
Re: Durant Brooks Venting Thread

we could have colt brennan exclusively learn to hold the ball and he cvould do it, and like someone said, then, we really could use a trck play and maybe get a TD on a fake fg.

brennan should be holding the ball imo
4thGenRedskin21 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:00 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.39864 seconds with 10 queries