|
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
07-05-2011, 10:06 PM
|
#1 | |
|
Warpath Hall of Fame
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: UNITED STATES
Age: 39
Posts: 36,242
|
Re: NFL Top 100
Quote:
Huge numbers every year and his team is always tough to beat.
__________________
“Mediocre people don’t like high achievers, and high achievers don’t like mediocre people.” ― Nick Saban |
|
|
|
|
07-05-2011, 11:49 AM
|
#2 |
|
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 896
|
Re: NFL Top 100
No Flecther and Orakpo is a shame. Really.......this whole list is a joke. The NFL is just trying to pass time until the lockout is over. They should do the top 100 worst NFL players now.....I'm sure they'd be a ton of skins on that list. We get no respect
__________________
TODD COLLINS WILL ALWAYS HOLD A SPECIAL PLACE IN MY HEART |
|
|
|
|
07-05-2011, 11:55 AM
|
#3 | |
|
Warpath Hall of Fame
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: UNITED STATES
Age: 39
Posts: 36,242
|
Re: NFL Top 100
Quote:
Fletch will never get any respect I guess.. Mind blowing and our only player was a guy won't even b on the team.. SMH. Dallas gets 6 players??????? LOL
__________________
“Mediocre people don’t like high achievers, and high achievers don’t like mediocre people.” ― Nick Saban |
|
|
|
|
|
07-05-2011, 12:12 PM
|
#4 |
|
Special Teams
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 279
|
Re: NFL Top 100
This is why you can't let the players have decision making power with anything.
|
|
|
|
|
07-05-2011, 12:56 PM
|
#5 |
|
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 6,526
|
Re: NFL Top 100
this list started as a joke by putting mcnabb on there at 100. a guy who was benched towards the end of the season shouldn't be on this list in the first place. Then you put absolutely no other redskins on when we could easily of had 1 more --at worst; 4 more--at best. Fletcher, Orakpo, Landry, DHall.
They put TO on there after a medicore season, Eric Berry with his good, but not spectacular rookie year, and named Brady the best overall when a lot of players say they think mannings better and more respectable. I even remember a player on NFLN saying that he didn't even get this 'list' to vote for...
__________________
"Anyones better than Madieu Williams" |
|
|
|
|
07-05-2011, 10:04 PM
|
#6 |
|
Special Teams
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 279
|
Re: NFL Top 100
That Eli Manning didn't make it on the list...and even Josh Freeman did. And I love what the guy brings to the table, but come on.
That Donovan McNabb got enough pity votes to make the top 100 and Eli Manning didn't...hell, that Matt Schaub didn't, that fuggin' Mark Sanchez or Matt Cassel didn't. I'd put SAM BRADFORD on there before Donovan McNabb, or friggin' Vonta Leach of all people. The fact they didn't give the players some ground rules on how to vote, and what seems to be a small sample size messed the whole thing up. Possibly on purpose. I mean according to the players, NO ONE voted on this thing. It's the Top 100 Players, vote on by the players, but there's 1600+ players in the league. So if you have, like 100 players vote on the top 100 then it's not exactly representative of the whole, and there's going to be some unbalanced and down right stupid choices in some spots. |
|
|
|
|
07-06-2011, 10:02 AM
|
#7 |
|
Hail Raiser
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 100,121
|
Re: NFL Top 100
|
|
|
|
|
07-06-2011, 11:19 AM
|
#8 | |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 17,657
|
Re: NFL Top 100
Quote:
NFL Network is just brutal right now. That top 100 show was just terrible. Almost unwatchable. Lindsay Soto is nice to look at and that's about it for that show. Plus they play the same damn commercials over and over and over. Hard Knocks re runs are all they have going for them right now. |
|
|
|
|
|
07-06-2011, 03:28 PM
|
#9 |
|
Hail Raiser
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 100,121
|
Re: NFL Top 100
Based on the sad state of this list I would say yes the fans probably know better.
Check out the fan rankings, I think they're much more accurate NFL The Top 100 NFL Players of 2011 As for McNabb being the best offensive performer in 2010? I think guys like Moss, Cooley, T. Williams, and even someone like Torain might have something to say about that. |
|
|
|
|
07-06-2011, 03:41 PM
|
#10 | |
|
Warpath Hall of Fame
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: UNITED STATES
Age: 39
Posts: 36,242
|
Re: NFL Top 100
Quote:
Sorry I'm a AR12 fan but Tom Brady is the number 1 Player in the league and has been for a while now especially QB. Look what he has to work with every year folks. Welker is a stud but then..... B.Tate, D. Branch etc
__________________
“Mediocre people don’t like high achievers, and high achievers don’t like mediocre people.” ― Nick Saban |
|
|
|
|
|
07-06-2011, 03:43 PM
|
#11 | |
|
Hail Raiser
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 100,121
|
Re: NFL Top 100
Quote:
I'd take Manning. |
|
|
|
|
|
07-06-2011, 03:44 PM
|
#12 |
|
Warpath Hall of Fame
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: UNITED STATES
Age: 39
Posts: 36,242
|
Re: NFL Top 100
D.Ware 26?
C Matthews 5? NFLN rankings were better
__________________
“Mediocre people don’t like high achievers, and high achievers don’t like mediocre people.” ― Nick Saban |
|
|
|
|
07-06-2011, 04:04 PM
|
#13 |
|
Special Teams
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 279
|
Re: NFL Top 100
What I notice about the fans list as opposed to the players list is that 1.) the top players tend to be younger and 2.) the higher ranked players tend to be on either winning football teams or teams poised to BECOME winning football teams.
It's The Top 100 of Players of 2011. By it's very name and definition, it should be the players people feel WILL be the best in 2011 based on their 2010 seasons. That's why a guy like Clay Matthews, coming off a season where he really should've been Defensive Player of the Year (**** Polamalu) is ranked number 5 in the fan vote ahead of DeMarcus Ware; Ware, great as he is, and he is great, is starting to get into those years where his numbers and stats will, possibly, begin to decline, whereas a guy like Clay Matthews is just coming into his prime, and already has his first Super Bowl ring. If it's about who the best players in 2011 are supposed to be, I can see Clay doing better that D-Ware. Same thing with Rodgers. Could you argue Tom Brady is probably the G.O.A.T? Yeah, you could make that argument. But, by every facet...numbers wise, championship wise, team wise, Rodgers had a better 2010 than Brady. So it's not hard to imagine why fans would vote him ahead of Tom Brady? It seems to me, when fans read "The Top 100 Players of 2011", they vote on who they feel will be the Top 100 Players of 2011. When players vote, they throw all logic out the nearest windows and just vote for whoever based on whatever they want because they weren't given any sort of guidelines or rules. |
|
|
|
|
07-06-2011, 10:01 PM
|
#14 |
|
Hail Raiser
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 100,121
|
Moss and Cooley's numbers were much better than McNabb's, he was truly mediocre.
|
|
|
|
|
07-06-2011, 11:15 PM
|
#15 | |
|
Warpath Hall of Fame
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: UNITED STATES
Age: 39
Posts: 36,242
|
Re: NFL Top 100
Quote:
I see how Moss didn't get in and even CC because he doesn't score many TD's and thats what the league is about but 98? Again I'm just stunned he didnt crack at least 90 or something.. 19.5 Sacks in 2 seasons? Come on
__________________
“Mediocre people don’t like high achievers, and high achievers don’t like mediocre people.” ― Nick Saban |
|
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
