![]() |
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 6,526
|
Re: Report claims Redskins won't cut Haynesworth
I would package Haynesworth and McNabb to minnesota for a 2nd this year and a 4th next year.
__________________
"Anyones better than Madieu Williams" |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Gamebreaker
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 14,755
|
Re: Report claims Redskins won't cut Haynesworth
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: PA
Age: 47
Posts: 17,460
|
Re: Report claims Redskins won't cut Haynesworth
Minnesota would give us the finger.
__________________
Not sent from a Droid, iPhone, Blackberry or toaster |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 754
|
Re: Report claims Redskins won't cut Haynesworth
Maybe a 2nd overall? McNabb and Haynesworth could make Minnesota a legit team. With Peterson in the backfield and Harvin/ (possibly) Rice/Shancoe/ Rudolph/Berrrian to throw to McNabb could do some damage. Pair up Haynesworth with Jarred Allen and Kevin Williams (let pat retire...he was useless at this point), and that is one unstoppable pass rushing force. 3 guys that command a double team on a line is ridiculous.
Not to mention McNabb would be a great tutor for Ponder. Just look at what he did for Vick in helping him become a pro. I think McNabb could impact their offense dramatically in the present and the future for helping ponder, and Haynesworth (definitely a risk here) could dramatically improve their defense. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 22,379
|
Re: Report claims Redskins won't cut Haynesworth
Quote:
__________________
R.I.P. #21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Gamebreaker
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 14,755
|
Re: Report claims Redskins won't cut Haynesworth
People make it out like it's going to be a big distraction, but it's not. When they sent Keyshawn home for the year (with pay) did you even hear about it anymore? Nope. We don't have to worry about him being around at the start of the season because he is going to be suspended. I can't imagine any scenario where this douche bag isn't suspended for a minimum of 4 games from the league. (he's already had 1 four game susension)
I say we sit his fat ass on the bench or make him inactive if he doesn't want to cooperate and finally suspend him again like last year if it comes down to it. No way we allow him to go to Philly (a division rival) unless they are willing to pay. A 2nd rounder at bare minimum. (which I know they'll never do) |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Special Teams
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 279
|
Re: Report claims Redskins won't cut Haynesworth
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 22,379
|
Re: Report claims Redskins won't cut Haynesworth
Good point, and the Bucs got rid of the him the following season. Once again, I don't get people's obsession with punishment, discipline, and insisting on keeping him on the team.
__________________
R.I.P. #21 |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 6,052
|
Re: Report claims Redskins won't cut Haynesworth
Essentially, we're handing him a roster spot while someone competing their ass off to make the team doesn't because of Feigner's shit. I have a problem with that.
__________________
Analysis using datasets (aka stats) is an attempt at reverse-engineering a player's "goodness". Virtuosity remembered, douchebaggery forgotten. The ideal character profile shoved down modern Western men and women's throats is Don Juan. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
A Dude
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Newtown Square, PA
Age: 46
Posts: 12,458
|
Re: Report claims Redskins won't cut Haynesworth
Quote:
I don't give a rat's ass about the 53rd player's feelings. I care about how best to win games. The 53rd player will be a non-contributor. Albert will eventually be dominant again.
__________________
God made certain people to play football. He was one of them. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Gamebreaker
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 14,755
|
Re: Report claims Redskins won't cut Haynesworth
A roster spot that won't be used anyway. The full team isn't active on game days so you essentially have guys that are collecting spots on a team that aren't being used. Why not sit his fat ass down and show him and other would be free agents that you aren't coming to DC with this kind of act.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Camp Scrub
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 14
|
Re: Report claims Redskins won't cut Haynesworth
Haynesworth needs to go.....he can only do harm to the team. He will NEVER do us any good. Ever.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Gamebreaker
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 14,755
|
Re: Report claims Redskins won't cut Haynesworth
Doesn't show up to OTAs. Doesn't show up on the practice field. Doesn't show up in games. See a trend here?
Judge scolds Albert Haynesworth's lawyer - WTOP.com Now, doesn't show up in court. Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 22,379
|
Re: Report claims Redskins won't cut Haynesworth
Quote:
__________________
R.I.P. #21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Most Interesting Man in the World
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Age: 39
Posts: 8,606
|
Re: Report claims Redskins won't cut Haynesworth
Great. Suspend him. It will be easier to keep him and sit his fat ass.
__________________
Vacancy |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|