Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Arrington on the way out?

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-13-2005, 01:38 PM   #1
TheMalcolmConnection
I like big (_|_)s.
 
TheMalcolmConnection's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Charlottesville, Virginia
Age: 44
Posts: 19,264
It's only January, but who else is ready for Fall again?
__________________
Regret nothing. At one time it was exactly what you wanted.
TheMalcolmConnection is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2005, 01:58 PM   #2
FRPLG
MVP
 
FRPLG's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Age: 47
Posts: 10,164
Not to beleaguer the point but...
"The rookie pool is, essentially, a cap within a cap. A team's rookie pool allocation is part of, not an addition to, the league's $75.1 million spending limit."

http://espn.go.com/nfl/columns/pasqu...n/1547910.html
FRPLG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2005, 04:22 PM   #3
CrazyCanuck
Serenity Now
 
CrazyCanuck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,008
Quote:
Originally Posted by FRPLG
"The rookie pool is, essentially, a cap within a cap. A team's rookie pool allocation is part of, not an addition to, the league's $75.1 million spending limit."
True. The NFL determines the rookie pool for each team based on the number of draft picks and position of those picks. They are assigned a rookie pool number. The total money allocated to draft picks cannot exceed this number, and is included the salary cap.

For instance in 2004 our rookie pool was about $3M. Here's the 2004 cap hits of our drafted rookies:

Taylor - $2.16M
Cooley - $395K
Molinaro - $255K
Wilson - $270K

Total - $3.06M
CrazyCanuck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2005, 04:26 PM   #4
CrazyCanuck
Serenity Now
 
CrazyCanuck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,008
As for Arrington, I don't think this thread is out of line.

The fact is Lavar is our most expensive player, missed most of the year, and the defense didn't seem to miss him too much. If we can run Samuels into the ground because of his cap number, I don't think it's crazy to bring up the same issue with Arrington.

That being said, like many have mentioned, the cap pretty much ensures Arrington will be here for a while. I estimate he's here at least thru 2007.
CrazyCanuck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2005, 02:10 PM   #5
joethiesmanfan
The Starter
 
joethiesmanfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,163
why we gotta lose lavar? please dont lose smoot and lavar
joethiesmanfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2005, 02:41 PM   #6
TheMalcolmConnection
I like big (_|_)s.
 
TheMalcolmConnection's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Charlottesville, Virginia
Age: 44
Posts: 19,264
Only a few more months til the draft to spice up some even MORE heated discussions!
__________________
Regret nothing. At one time it was exactly what you wanted.
TheMalcolmConnection is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2005, 03:16 PM   #7
Daseal
Puppy Kicker
 
Daseal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Arlington, Virginia
Age: 43
Posts: 8,341
if JKC was owner we'd be in salary cap hell because he couldn't buy whatever he wanted. =p

TO was a Free Agent too, jdlea, and shouldn't have even gotten that.
Daseal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2005, 03:22 PM   #8
jdlea
Playmaker
 
jdlea's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Arlington, VA
Age: 41
Posts: 3,109
TO wasn't a free agent, remember? He was a 49er
jdlea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2005, 03:56 PM   #9
FRPLG
MVP
 
FRPLG's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Age: 47
Posts: 10,164
when was the last time we had a 70 reply thread in less than a day? Craziness I tell you...
FRPLG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2005, 04:07 PM   #10
TheMalcolmConnection
I like big (_|_)s.
 
TheMalcolmConnection's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Charlottesville, Virginia
Age: 44
Posts: 19,264
I haven't been on here that long, but I would say this has been the quickest bunch of replies I've ever seen.

Then again, look how controversial the subject matter is. I like how everyone is quick to put down the thought of trading our core players.
__________________
Regret nothing. At one time it was exactly what you wanted.
TheMalcolmConnection is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2005, 04:13 PM   #11
skinsguy
Pro Bowl
 
skinsguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Greensboro, North Carolina
Posts: 6,766
I got tired of reading every single post, but to sum up..it doesn't make any sense to get rid of Lavar Arrington. If he hadn't gotten hurt this year, the issue would have never been discussed. We have our team set with just a couple adjustments on offense. I'm sure the FO knows how to handle the cap situation.
skinsguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2005, 04:20 PM   #12
jdlea
Playmaker
 
jdlea's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Arlington, VA
Age: 41
Posts: 3,109
Quote:
Originally Posted by skinsguy
I got tired of reading every single post, but to sum up..it doesn't make any sense to get rid of Lavar Arrington. If he hadn't gotten hurt this year, the issue would have never been discussed. We have our team set with just a couple adjustments on offense. I'm sure the FO knows how to handle the cap situation.
Amen. Accept for the FO part, I kinda disagree, but time will tell.
jdlea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2005, 04:52 PM   #13
Hogster
Camp Scrub
 
Hogster's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 11
ARE YOU GUYS SERIOUS? I cannot believe we are second guessing a guy who has been the soul of our team for years, i guess now that we have a few other guys who can play football we forget who has gave us hope over the last few years. Dont get me wrong i know that we have a few good ball players but NONE OF THEM are better than LA Baby
Hogster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2005, 05:23 PM   #14
EEich
The Starter
 
EEich's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Bristol, CT
Age: 62
Posts: 1,001
We haven't had a winning team with Lavar as our "soul".
EEich is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2005, 07:12 PM   #15
Gmanc711
Thank You, Sean.
 
Gmanc711's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Gaithersburg, MD
Age: 40
Posts: 7,506
You know, if were were discussing about Resigning LaVar and people were against it, I would understand.

If somthing happens in court and the contract is void and people want to argue to not resign him, thats great.

However, in no way, shape or form can we afford to trade him. End. Of. story.
__________________
#21
Gmanc711 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:00 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.23370 seconds with 10 queries