Around the NFL...Training Camp Style

[SFREDSKIN]

Originally Posted by NC_Skins

Future DT in the NFL.

Alabama lineman bench presses 600 pounds | Dr. Saturday - Yahoo! Sports



Nope. He's definitely not doing roids.

People of Polynesian decent in my opinion are the strongest human folks I have ever met. I knew this Tongan guy at my old gym (he since has passed away a few years back from a heart attack) Harry weighed around 300lbs. and he used to bench press 660lbs and probably more. This guy was amazing, whenever he benched the gym stopped and people watched. No he wasn't on roids, he was all natural (he loved to eat) we went out to a restaurant once and man that guy ate as much as he benched pressed. RIP Harry.

[The Goat]

Originally Posted by NC_Skins

Future DT in the NFL.

Alabama lineman bench presses 600 pounds | Dr. Saturday - Yahoo! Sports



Nope. He's definitely not doing roids.

...and he's an Aussie...they always have a mean streak!!

[30gut]

The FO Steeler's doesn't usually make a lot of mistakes.
But, this contract for Brown clearly looks like a mistake.

I guess they're gonna sign Wallace to an even bigger contract?

Wallace is one of the best deep threats in the game.
Without Wallace drawing the double coverage can Anotonio Brown even put his numbers?

[MTK]

Likely that Wallace will be somewhere else next year.

[Chico23231]

Originally Posted by Mattyk

Likely that Wallace will be somewhere else next year.

The thing that is kinda crazy is 42.5 over 5 years is a nice contract for a WR, you gotta think Wallace was offered this...kinda a head scratcher he wouldnt take it. I like Wallace alot, and would like to see him in a Skins uniform, but not over a 42 million dollar contract.

[artmonkforhallofamein07]

Originally Posted by Chico23231

The thing that is kinda crazy is 42.5 over 5 years is a nice contract for a WR, you gotta think Wallace was offered this...kinda a head scratcher he wouldnt take it. I like Wallace alot, and would like to see him in a Skins uniform, but not over a 42 million dollar contract.

I wouldn't expect to see Mike Wallace in our uni due to the money we have in our current wr and the cap penalties

[CultBrennan59]

Now that Antonio Brown has signed a 5 year $42 million deal, do you think the steelers still put him out there on Special teams returning kick offs and punts?

[skinsfaninok]

Maybe brown shows that he's worth it? Never know until they play

[MonkFan4Life]

Originally Posted by mbedner3420

I'm really hoping dropping four picks for one player turns out to be the best move the front office made... Otherwise there is going to be some egg on some faces.

We dropped 3 picks. 2 firsts and a second.

That 4th pick you speak of was Robert Griffin.

[SOUL-SKINS]

Originally Posted by MonkFan4Life

We dropped 3 picks. 2 firsts and a second.

That 4th pick you speak of was Robert Griffin.

Doesn't it seem like alot of people are having a hard time understanding that fact ????

[HailGreen28]

Originally Posted by SOUL-SKINS

Doesn't it seem like alot of people are having a hard time understanding that fact ????

FFS. Here we go again. How many picks did we give the Rams for RG3?

[HailGreen28]

Originally Posted by MonkFan4Life

We dropped 3 picks. 2 firsts and a second.

That 4th pick you speak of was Robert Griffin.

We spent 4 count them 4 picks to get robert griffin. 3 first rounders and 1 second rounder. It's that simple.

The fact we used those picks, to get the ram's pick, that we used to get robert griffin does not change the cost.

Our 4 picks = the ram's pick we wanted = rg3. Our cost was 4 picks.

Period.

.

[EARTHQUAKE2689]

Originally Posted by HailGreen28

We spent 4 count them 4 picks to get robert griffin. 3 first rounders and 1 second rounder. It's that simple.

The fact we used those picks, to get the ram's pick, that we used to get robert griffin does not change the cost.

Our 4 picks = the ram's pick we wanted = rg3. Our cost was 4 picks.

Period.

.

How was our cost 4 picks, if one of the picks was RG3? RG3 wasn't on the Rams when we made that trade. We gave away four and got back one. 4-1=3. Simple math man. Simple math, period.

[Lotus]

Ermagerd not the trade argument again. Whether you say that the trade was 4 picks or 3, you are correct, depending on perspective.

We sent 4 picks to the Rams. So the cost was 4 picks GROSS.
We got 1 pick to use on Gryphon. So the cost was 4-1=3 picks NET.

Both 4 and 3 are correct, depending on how one wishes to view the situation.

[EARTHQUAKE2689]

Originally Posted by Lotus

Ermagerd not the trade argument again. Whether you say that the trade was 4 picks or 3, you are correct, depending on perspective.

We sent 4 picks to the Rams. So the cost was 4 picks GROSS.
We got 1 pick to use on Gryphon. So the cost was 4-1=3 picks NET.

Both 4 and 3 are correct, depending on how one wishes to view the situation.

And what about the mortgage?