Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Redskins agree to deal with Jason Hatcher

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-15-2014, 11:20 AM   #61
KI Skins Fan
Pro Bowl
 
KI Skins Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Jacksonville, Forida
Posts: 6,399
Re: Redskins agree to deal with Jason Hatcher

Quote:
Originally Posted by GTripp0012 View Post
It's a large-ish contract. Not a monster deal, but a good payout.

The Redskins see him as an impact talent. The other teams that he was taking visits with saw him as a valuable role player.

We'll see who is right. If he gets 6-8 sacks from a 3-4 DE position, that's a big impact.
As you know, it's not just the sacks. It's the QB hits and the hurries. It's being disruptive. We desperately needed to get some inside pressure on the QB and now I think we'll get that from Hatcher. Lord knows, he has given our OLines and QBs fits over the years.

And there are other benefits to this signing, as well. For example, to me, one of the key things that would make keeping Orakpo worth the money was to improve our inside pass rush so Brian could be more effective. Now we've done that.
__________________
I'm a big Caitlin Clark fan!
KI Skins Fan is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 03-15-2014, 11:23 AM   #62
GTripp0012
Living Legend
 
GTripp0012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 36
Posts: 15,994
Re: Redskins agree to deal with Jason Hatcher

Quote:
Originally Posted by KI Skins Fan View Post
As you know, it's not just the sacks. It's the QB hits and the hurries. It's being disruptive. Lord knows, he has given our OLines and QBs fits over the years.

We desperately needed to get some inside pressure on the QB and now I think we'll get that from Hatcher. To me, one of the key things that would make keeping Orakpo worth the money was to improve our inside pass rush. Now we've done that.
It's easy to figure out WHY they paid him: they see him as an impact player at a position where they need the help desperately.

It's one thing to pay for the performance you need, which is what they've done. Whether they're going to get it is a different question. At 6-8 sacks, plus the disruption you would expect from a guy getting to the QB that often, that's the kind of impact you're looking for with this contract.

If the plan works, the interior pass rush should improve, and everyone will benefit.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation.
GTripp0012 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2014, 11:28 AM   #63
KI Skins Fan
Pro Bowl
 
KI Skins Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Jacksonville, Forida
Posts: 6,399
Re: Redskins agree to deal with Jason Hatcher

Quote:
Originally Posted by GTripp0012 View Post
It's easy to figure out WHY they paid him: they see him as an impact player at a position where they need the help desperately.

It's one thing to pay for the performance you need, which is what they've done. Whether they're going to get it is a different question. At 6-8 sacks, plus the disruption you would expect from a guy getting to the QB that often, that's the kind of impact you're looking for with this contract.

If the plan works, the interior pass rush should improve, and everyone will benefit.
Ah yes, the eternal conundrum of NFL Free Agent signings!
__________________
I'm a big Caitlin Clark fan!
KI Skins Fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2014, 11:31 AM   #64
GTripp0012
Living Legend
 
GTripp0012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 36
Posts: 15,994
Re: Redskins agree to deal with Jason Hatcher

Quote:
Originally Posted by KI Skins Fan View Post
Ah yes, the eternal conundrum of NFL Free Agent signings!
You're right. This is not a unique problem that the Redskins face. They just have a bad history with it.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation.
GTripp0012 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2014, 11:41 AM   #65
GTripp0012
Living Legend
 
GTripp0012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 36
Posts: 15,994
Re: Redskins agree to deal with Jason Hatcher

The other interesting thing about this deal is that it's the Redskins telling you they aren't planning on addressing DL in the draft.

I don't doubt they might take a guy who falls to the 6th or 7th round who can come in and compete for Jarvis Jenkins roster spot, but I'd expect the draft to lean heavy on offense, with the chance that they'll grab a safety or linebacker they really like.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation.
GTripp0012 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2014, 10:45 AM   #66
donofriose
The Starter
 
donofriose's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 2,097
Re: Redskins agree to deal with Jason Hatcher

Supposedly the redskins offer was way above what other teams were going to give him. Even the raiders, which is a little concerning.

Hatcher says Redskins ‘blew the doors off’ other offers - The Washington Post
donofriose is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2014, 10:53 AM   #67
Schneed10
A Dude
 
Schneed10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Newtown Square, PA
Age: 45
Posts: 12,426
Re: Redskins agree to deal with Jason Hatcher

Quote:
Originally Posted by donofriose View Post
Supposedly the redskins offer was way above what other teams were going to give him. Even the raiders, which is a little concerning.

Hatcher says Redskins ‘blew the doors off’ other offers - The Washington Post
Agree with this, generally you like to hear what's going on right now with the Ryan Clark negotiations, where the player leaves the visit without signing, then it takes some time, and then hopefully a deal gets announced. That's a sign that the team was being shrewd in its pricing.

To hear we blew the doors off tells me we may have overpaid. But still, it's not a huge financial commitment to Hatcher. $10.5M guaranteed over 4 years is not the kind of contract that puts you behind the 8 ball.

I do think playing next to Cofield and alongside either Rak or Kerrigan, and in the one-gap that Haslett keeps talking about, there's plenty of opportunity for the line as a whole to do some damage.

I'm not concerned if Hatcher himself only gets 6 sacks. His presence should mean Cofield has a better shot at penetrating. And I like me some Barry Cofield a lot. With defensive linemen, it's not about individual stats, it's more about how did the whole line perform as a unit.
__________________
God made certain people to play football. He was one of them.
Schneed10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2014, 10:57 AM   #68
Schneed10
A Dude
 
Schneed10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Newtown Square, PA
Age: 45
Posts: 12,426
Re: Redskins agree to deal with Jason Hatcher

Quote:
Originally Posted by GTripp0012 View Post
The other interesting thing about this deal is that it's the Redskins telling you they aren't planning on addressing DL in the draft.

I don't doubt they might take a guy who falls to the 6th or 7th round who can come in and compete for Jarvis Jenkins roster spot, but I'd expect the draft to lean heavy on offense, with the chance that they'll grab a safety or linebacker they really like.
With the current hole at safety being about the width of the Grand Canyon, I think we're just about broadcasting our intention to take a S in round 2 or round 3 anyway. But if they land Clark and maybe bring back Meriweather, maybe that changes.
__________________
God made certain people to play football. He was one of them.
Schneed10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:08 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 3.46340 seconds with 10 queries