![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1 | |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,323
|
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
Quote:
I read an article recently that had JC as the second best FA QB after Orton, who's probably going to sign before FA. That's an ugly list. I would rather stick with JC and fix the OL. *BTW-I doubt the Vikes release T-Jack. After they signed Rosenfels they still named T-Jack the No.2 QB because he out played Sage in the preseason. T-Jack might end up being their QB after Favre retires. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Virginia Beach
Posts: 4,347
|
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
If that's true, put JC on the bench so he doesn't get hurt or continue his poor play and he has some value in the off-season.
__________________
"I would bet.....(if), an angel fairy came down and said, '[You can have anything] in the world you would like to own,' I wouldn't be surprised if you said a football club and particularly the Washington Redskins.'' — Jack Kent Cooke, 1996. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Stephens City, VA
Posts: 2,953
|
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
Pennington's career is likely over, and besides having an absolutley shot, raggedy throwing arm that never had strength to begin with, i dont see how he would make the difference here. The team needs the throw downfield. Chad is a great QB bu he never had the arm even in his prime before all the injuries....
__________________
Time to nut up or shut up |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Detroit area
Posts: 4,153
|
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
Quote:
Yeah, never understood why Chad was somewhat of a hot commoditiy after his stint with the Jets. Alex Smith would be an intriguing FA move though. I would get Chase Daniel back, keep JC if possible, dump Collins and bring in Smith if we don't draft a QB. JC is a backup QB at best now. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Swearinger
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 12,626
|
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
Quote:
__________________
Tardy |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Stephens City, VA
Posts: 2,953
|
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
Thanks to everybody who has welcomed me here. I can see already that this is the place for me. People seem friendlier and the whole board has a cleaner, more family style orientation to it.
Also i tip my hand to SmootSmack for keeping me from foolishly going back on ES and launching a tirade..people here are clearly level headed. I can tell you that in the nearly 5 years i spent over there, nobody there ever made me feel welcome like this. Thank you again. Mark
__________________
Time to nut up or shut up |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Quietly Dominating the East
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Naples, Florida
Posts: 10,675
|
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
Quote:
HTTR
__________________
Goodbye Sean..........Vaya Con Dios thankyou Joe....... “God made certain people to play football. He was one of them.” – Joe Gibbs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
Quote:
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
You know one thing about Alex Smith. Yes he's been a bust so far but he's also been through five offensive coordinators in five seasons. I'm just saying we've used that as an excuse for Campbell...
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 38
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
Quote:
Of course, he's still only 25, and Jason Campbell will be 28 on the 31st of December, but I have to think that Campbell has already accomplished more here than Alex Smith will ever get a chance to in his career.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
Quote:
Still, in the interest of fairness, I felt it should be pointed out he has had to deal with various coordinators
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 38
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
Quote:
Their OL kinda sucks too, but they really could do something down the stretch with Smith at QB. The 49ers have largely been void of talent for much of the second half of the decade, but every one of their first round draft picks since 2005 are now in the starting lineup, which I'm sure is something not a lot of franchises can boast. Well, I guess Kentwan Balmer isn't, but he was as much of a first rounder as Patrick Ramsey was.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Woodbridge, VA
Age: 43
Posts: 3,238
|
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
that statement pisses me off so much, you are either accurate or not, and honestly he isn't, but i think "I think a franchise QB can help an OL more than a franchise OL can help a QB" is very ture just look at big ben in pitt, the only problem picking a qb like tha out of the draft is like hitting the mega millions
__________________
"I don't think anybody should have regrets, especially me, ... You don't regret what you do in your life. If you do it, you do it for a reason." ST21 |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
We don't need to spend high draft picks on linemen though, we just need to develop some of our young linemen (and add some more-namely OTs) and let them gel together. I think a franchise QB can help an OL more than a franchise OL can help a QB
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 38
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
Quote:
Part of me thinks that he's given the current OL plenty of chances to get their act together, and he probably has, but there's another part of me that thinks one of the reasons that the Redskins are struggling to settle on a starting five is because Campbell's footwork from under center are so inconsistent. It seems like he's become increasingly difficult for the OL to protect, which is one of the way that player regression will manifest. Of course, if the backs would do a half decent job in blitz pickup, we probably wouldn't be having this conversation.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|