The "Inside Word" on the QB Search

[artmonkforhallofamein07]

Yeah all of those ifs, buts, and things that need to fall into place are not even close to happening to this point, so to say I am gitty for PM becoming a Redskin is not quite were we are right now.

Eagerly waiting to see how this offseason and acquisition of players goes before I am gitty,

[Alvin Walton]

I find it hard to get excited about someone that will be so obviously temporary.

[44Deezel]

I'm starting to get excited about Kyle Orton. Well, not really, but I'd like to see what they could do with ALL their picks and free agency. The Skins could be rock solid at every position BUT QB going into 2013. Then, I wouldn't care how many picks they gave up to land the QB of the future. Orton could be a 20TD 10INT guy. That would have been worth 5 more wins last year, IMHO.

[celts32]

Originally Posted by 44Deezel

I'm starting to get excited about Kyle Orton. Well, not really, but I'd like to see what they could do with ALL their picks and free agency. The Skins could be rock solid at every position BUT QB going into 2013. Then, I wouldn't care how many picks they gave up to land the QB of the future. Orton could be a 20TD 10INT guy. That would have been worth 5 more wins last year, IMHO.

Rock soild at every position except QB? If you don't have a QB you have nothing. Your plan has us throwing away 2012. I would rather be weak in a few areas and very good at QB. Sort of like the Giants, Patriots & Packers...

[Lotus]

Originally Posted by celts32

Rock soild at every position except QB? If you don't have a QB you have nothing. Your plan has us throwing away 2012. I would rather be weak in a few areas and very good at QB. Sort of like like the Giants, Patriots & Packers...

Well said.

[NYCskinfan82]

RG3 to Rams; Bradford to Redskins? - Hogs Haven

For a 1st this year & next year, I would do it.

[redskins5044]

Originally Posted by NYCskinfan82

RG3 to Rams; Bradford to Redskins? - Hogs Haven

For a 1st this year & next year, I would do it.

the more i think about it, i wouldnt give up 2 1st round picks for him. he was a 1st round pick and if the rams want to get rid of him he loses some value IMO. i would give up this years 1st and next years 3rd or 4th round pick.

[NYCskinfan82]

Originally Posted by redskins5044

the more i think about it, i wouldnt give up 2 1st round picks for him. he was a 1st round pick and if the rams want to get rid of him he loses some value IMO. i would give up this years 1st and next years 3rd or 4th round pick.

If we could get him for that I would do that but I don't think that will get him, RGIII & Luck will take so much more. Not losing our 2nd round pick allows us to trade back & still get more/good picks IMO.

[redskins5044]

Originally Posted by NYCskinfan82

If we could get him for that I would do that but I don't think that will get him, RGIII & Luck will take so much more. Not losing our 2nd round pick allows us to trade back & still get more/good picks IMO.

i agree if we attempt to get luck or rg3 we arent going to have many draft picks left. i just think if the rams take RG3 then they are de-vauling bradford and doesnt warrant 2 1st round picks.

[NYCskinfan82]

Originally Posted by redskins5044

i agree if we attempt to get luck or rg3 we arent going to have many draft picks left. i just think if the rams take RG3 then they are de-vauling bradford and doesnt warrant 2 1st round picks.

Fisher might look at RGIII like McNair they are/were both mobile/accurate/leaders.

[Mechanix544]

Originally Posted by redskins5044

i agree if we attempt to get luck or rg3 we arent going to have many draft picks left. i just think if the rams take RG3 then they are de-vauling bradford and doesnt warrant 2 1st round picks.

that is a very good point. Thinking Bradford could potentially come "on the cheap" might actually raise his value in other teams wanting to trade for him though.

[EARTHQUAKE2689]

Originally Posted by redskins5044

i agree if we attempt to get luck or rg3 we arent going to have many draft picks left. i just think if the rams take RG3 then they are de-vauling bradford and doesnt warrant 2 1st round picks.

Where do you get the logic that we won't have many picks left. We could get him only losing a 2nd rounder this year.

[SBXVII]

Originally Posted by redskins5044

the more i think about it, i wouldnt give up 2 1st round picks for him. he was a 1st round pick and if the rams want to get rid of him he loses some value IMO. i would give up this years 1st and next years 3rd or 4th round pick.

And there in lies my point. IF Bradford was such a good QB or a franchise QB they would not be getting g rid of him after only a few yrs. There is no reason to give up 2 first RD picks, heck I don't think I would give up one first RD pick.

Now if the Rams are giving the Skins their #2 pick then yes I guess 2 first RD picks but not for Bradford. My fear is the team tosses in several waisted picks for Bradford who's not going to do much better then Grossman and still be the same old Bradford cause our OL is not any better then the Rams was.

I think the most obsurd statements by the media is its ok for the Skins to give up several picks to the Rams because the Rams have need of them and are "rebuilding". But apparently the Skins are not rebuilding like MS said the team was late in the season. I guess the Skins are all set player wise and don't need anything more then Bradford.

[EARTHQUAKE2689]

I would NOT give up 2 firsts for Sam Bradford.

[Hog1]

Originally Posted by EARTHQUAKE2689

I would NOT give up 2 firsts for Sam Bradford.

^^^^^^^