Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Name Reveal 2.2.22

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-02-2022, 09:18 AM   #796
jamf
Pro Bowl
 
jamf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: San Diego Ca
Posts: 5,319
Re: Name Reveal 2.2.22

Fuck this shit.
jamf is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 02-02-2022, 09:24 AM   #797
mooby
Hug Anne Spyder
 
mooby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 20,468
Re: Name Reveal 2.2.22

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chico23231 View Post
Those uniforms are terrible

Expected…I guess
The home uni isn't so bad, but the road uni looks just like the Falcons or the Cards. And the black alternate - there's literally nothing special about it, plenty of teams have black alternates nowadays.

Fuckin Danny.
__________________
Hail to the Football Team
mooby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2022, 09:30 AM   #798
Chico23231
Warpath Hall of Fame
 
Chico23231's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 34,505
Re: Name Reveal 2.2.22

Why don’t they do a cammo motif? As long as don’t use female like colors…stick to earth tones, sand, olive, beige it would compliment the name and idea behind it.

This shit looks weak
__________________
My pronouns: King/Your ruler

He Gets Us
Chico23231 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2022, 09:39 AM   #799
EARTHQUAKE2689
You did WHAT?!?
 
EARTHQUAKE2689's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: In The Kitchen With Dyna.
Age: 35
Posts: 14,167
Re: Name Reveal 2.2.22

Quote:
Originally Posted by mooby View Post
The home uni isn't so bad, but the road uni looks just like the Falcons or the Cards. And the black alternate - there's literally nothing special about it, plenty of teams have black alternates nowadays.

Fuckin Danny.
The home jerseys just look like Central Michigan, that's all I can see when I look at them
__________________
https://open.spotify.com/artist/1NG9zNxqMP8cYNP72QqUQT

Shameless self-promotion. It is what it is.
EARTHQUAKE2689 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2022, 09:41 AM   #800
OnceWeWereKings
The Starter
 
OnceWeWereKings's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Catasauqua, PA
Age: 43
Posts: 1,350
Re: Name Reveal 2.2.22

Black jersey looks way too similar to the steelers.
__________________
To beer, or not to beer? That is the ques.....oh, look...a beer.
OnceWeWereKings is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2022, 09:57 AM   #801
punch it in
From a Land Down Under
 
punch it in's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: toms river, nj
Age: 53
Posts: 23,606
Re: Name Reveal 2.2.22

Get a quarterback and win. That is all. HTTC.
punch it in is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2022, 09:59 AM   #802
calia
Playmaker
 
calia's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Woodside, CA
Age: 56
Posts: 3,539
Re: Name Reveal 2.2.22

They should have put Summo in charge. He’d have come up with something better in like 5 minutes. Sheesh - disappointing to me. Not a fan of any aspect of this.

I wonder if a new owner would come in and change it all - if ownership changed, of course. Would be rather comical for that to happen on a dime after all this.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
"Coach, what do you think of your team's execution?"
"I'm all for it." -- Coach McKay
calia is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2022, 10:00 AM   #803
Meks
Pro Bowl
 
Meks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: South Jersey
Age: 39
Posts: 5,648
Re: Name Reveal 2.2.22

The jerseys suck.
__________________
R.I.P #21SEAN TAYLOR
Meks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2022, 10:18 AM   #804
punch it in
From a Land Down Under
 
punch it in's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: toms river, nj
Age: 53
Posts: 23,606
Re: Name Reveal 2.2.22

Look did anyone think we were gonna be happy about something Dan fuckin Snyder was in charge of?

But you know what? If they win everything about this will be better. And honestly lets see them in action - maybe will look better than we think? Idk. Idc.
I just want to win. I will never give douche Snyder credit for anything even if we do.
punch it in is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2022, 10:59 AM   #805
calia
Playmaker
 
calia's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Woodside, CA
Age: 56
Posts: 3,539
Re: Name Reveal 2.2.22

It has already been pointed out that the logo is kind of wrong - it points to the year we won Superbowls, not the season (eg, 1992 instead of 1991). Amateur hour.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
"Coach, what do you think of your team's execution?"
"I'm all for it." -- Coach McKay
calia is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2022, 11:04 AM   #806
mredskins
Gamebreaker
 
mredskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 12,801
Re: Name Reveal 2.2.22

Quote:
Originally Posted by calia View Post
They should have put Summo in charge. He’d have come up with something better in like 5 minutes. Sheesh - disappointing to me. Not a fan of any aspect of this.

I wonder if a new owner would come in and change it all - if ownership changed, of course. Would be rather comical for that to happen on a dime after all this.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I bet there is nine million things that have to come in to consideration when designing the logo.

Its human nature to resist change, yes i wish we could be the Redskins but considering who is in charge this could have been way worst.

Now imagine Watson in this uniform and all the angry melts away.

I am usually negative Nancy but i kind of like all of it and i definitely wear a black Coms jersey with Way/Watson on the back.
__________________
When life gives you paper jams, turn them into paper footballs!
mredskins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2022, 11:09 AM   #807
calia
Playmaker
 
calia's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Woodside, CA
Age: 56
Posts: 3,539
Re: Name Reveal 2.2.22

I don’t quite agree - I think a change to a better name, logo and unis would have made me excited about this. The only thing I like about the unis is that the face mask is burgundy which is cool. But the rest is pretty boring.

Summo - show us how it’s done, man!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
"Coach, what do you think of your team's execution?"
"I'm all for it." -- Coach McKay
calia is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2022, 11:10 AM   #808
MTK
\m/
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,518
Re: Name Reveal 2.2.22

Quote:
Originally Posted by calia View Post
It has already been pointed out that the logo is kind of wrong - it points to the year we won Superbowls, not the season (eg, 1992 instead of 1991). Amateur hour.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Technically it's correct. It was the 91/92 season, but the game was played in 92, try googling 1992 Super Bowl and see what results come up.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2022, 11:12 AM   #809
MTK
\m/
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,518
Re: Name Reveal 2.2.22

Quote:
Originally Posted by mredskins View Post
I bet there is nine million things that have to come in to consideration when designing the logo.

Its human nature to resist change, yes i wish we could be the Redskins but considering who is in charge this could have been way worst.

Now imagine Watson in this uniform and all the angry melts away.

I am usually negative Nancy but i kind of like all of it and i definitely wear a black Coms jersey with Way/Watson on the back.
Yes everyone hates change and coming from this owner, people were going to be even more inclined to hate whatever change was coming. Totally understandable.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2022, 11:16 AM   #810
Chief X_Phackter
Pro Bowl
 
Chief X_Phackter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Lakewood, CO
Posts: 5,613
Re: Name Reveal 2.2.22

Quote:
Originally Posted by calia View Post
It has already been pointed out that the logo is kind of wrong - it points to the year we won Superbowls, not the season (eg, 1992 instead of 1991). Amateur hour.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
People just being stupid and over the top picky about shit now. Those were the years they actually won the Super Bowl, so I don't see anything wrong with that at all. If they named the Super Bowls by the actual year, instead of in Roman Numeral order, that is exactly what they would be, just like the Pro Bowls...

The 2022 Pro Bowl is coming up, or should we be calling it the 2021 Pro Bowl, or the post-2021 Pro Bowl? No.
Chief X_Phackter is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:55 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 3.26740 seconds with 10 queries