Any update on Campbell?

[Southpaw]

Originally Posted by Redskins_P

If you look back when Thomas was healthy our running game was great. Once he went down........Portis' numbers went down.

Portis was also dinged up for those last few weeks too. I don't think it was just a matter of Thomas being out that made the running game ineffective. But Brunell certainly wasn't able to pick up the slack either.

[Redskins_P]

Originally Posted by Southpaw

What team were you watching?

Same one you were watching.

I bet if Thomas was healthy when we played Philly, Tampa, and Seattle.......we would've had a much better running game.

I'm just trying to point out how big the loss of Thomas was....thats all.

[Redskins_P]

Originally Posted by Southpaw

Portis was also dinged up for those last few weeks too. I don't think it was just a matter of Thomas being out that made the running game ineffective. But Brunell certainly wasn't able to pick up the slack either.

Very true. But you have to admit that losing Thomas was huge.


I agree with Brunell, but he was also dinged up, and I think he ran out of gas towards the end...

[TheMalcolmConnection]

I won't make Brunell the scapegoat but there HAD to be someone else open when he was throwing the ball. We have Royal, Sellers, Thrash and even Glass Jaw Jacobs that had to have SOME kind of separation when they were double and triple-teaming Moss. No doubt it was an all-around effort, but I refuse to believe that there weren't receivers available to throw to.

[FRPLG]

Originally Posted by TheMalcolmConnection

I won't make Brunell the scapegoat but there HAD to be someone else open when he was throwing the ball. We have Royal, Sellers, Thrash and even Glass Jaw Jacobs that had to have SOME kind of separation when they were double and triple-teaming Moss. No doubt it was an all-around effort, but I refuse to believe that there weren't receivers available to throw to.

I can tell you from the nosebleeds at FedEx that there often was not anyone open besides Cooley or Moss. That's the problem. If you are a WR in this league and you get single coverage you need to be able to get open and get open good. None of our guys were able to. Actually Thrash was not bad before he got injured but he got injured shortly after Patten and once Thrash came back he wasn't nearly the same. I am telling you all our WRs just weren't good enough. It is not on Brunell that these guys didn't give him any options.

[MTK]

Just look at what happened last week, one of the first plays of the game Brunell goes to Jacobs and hits the bum right in the hands and he drops it.

He stinks, let's face it. Patten was out half the season and TJ had a golden opportunity to shine and he didn't do jack.

As mediocre as Patten was, Jacobs was worse.

I still think Patten's production would have increased as the year went on, once we got over the infatuation with Moss and once teams started doubling him, Patten would have had the chance to step up.

[skinsguy]

You would think Mark Brunell must have stole Offiss' woman as much as he putts him down all the time.

[Redskins_P]

Originally Posted by skinsguy

You would think Mark Brunell must have stole Offiss' woman as much as he putts him down all the time.

Either that or he has a huge crush on Ramsey.....

[RedskinPete]

Originally Posted by Redskins_P

Either that or he has a huge crush on Ramsey.....

YOU MEAN A MAN CRUSH DON"T YOU REDSKIN-P?????

[Redskins_P]

Originally Posted by RedskinPete

YOU MEAN A MAN CRUSH DON"T YOU REDSKIN-P?????

Who knows. You'd have to ask offiss. I would hope its a man crush.

[offiss]

Originally Posted by skinsguy

You would think Mark Brunell must have stole Offiss' woman as much as he putts him down all the time.

It sounds like to me Brunell took your virginity the way you stick up for him all the time, you know your first love can do no wrong.

[skinsguy]

Originally Posted by offiss

It sounds like to me Brunell took your virginity the way you stick up for him all the time, you know your first love can do no wrong.

I've never had a gay first, second, third, or last love, so I suppose I will take your word for it.

[Twilbert07]

This column is right on.

http://www.washtimes.com/sports/2006...4142-3163r.htm

[railcon56]

Originally Posted by Twilbert07

This column is right on.

http://www.washtimes.com/sports/2006...4142-3163r.htm

This says it all

[offiss]

Originally Posted by Twilbert07

This column is right on.

http://www.washtimes.com/sports/2006...4142-3163r.htm

Has this guy been reading my post's?

Matty who owns the copy rights to my posts? We may have a law suit?