Brunell in Saunders's offense ?

[warriorzpath]

Originally Posted by 12thMan

See thread in parking lot. 15 reasons to have a tail!!

I don't think a tail would help me in this case tho

[12thMan]

Originally Posted by warriorzpath

I don't think a tail would help me in this case tho

Keep fightin' bro!

[TheMalcolmConnection]

[warriorzpath]

Originally Posted by TheMalcolmConnection

The old lady is just pooped from her wild cinco de mayo party.

[That Guy]

gannon started a bunch of games and proved he was capable BEFORE 35. collins hasn't even proven he can start at all, therefore that comparision isn't valid. you keep repeating yourself, but i still haven't seen a single example of a QB turning it on past 35.

and you've TOTALLY misrepresented that quote in your mind. I SAW the interview it was taken from. saunders was asked about his qbs, and he talked about them. THAT'S IT. He didn't come out of left field to start harping on how great his QBs are, he ssimply anwered a direct question about them when asked. You're repeating something completely out of context and representing it as something that it's not.

if you don't have new info, please let this die. This is getting as ridiculous as the CFL thread or the timmy hasslebeck is our true answer at QB and we're set for life crap that came up a few years ago. collins is a scrub, and will be until he retires. maybe he'll win a couple games, but its obvious there's a reason he's never started more than one full season.

[warriorzpath]

Originally Posted by That Guy

gannon started a bunch of games and proved he was capable BEFORE 35. collins hasn't even proven he can start at all, therefore that comparision isn't valid. you keep repeating yourself, but i still haven't seen a single example of a QB turning it on past 35.

and you've TOTALLY misrepresented that quote in your mind. I SAW the interview it was taken from. saunders was asked about his qbs, and he talked about them. THAT'S IT. He didn't come out of left field to start harping on how great his QBs are, he ssimply anwered a direct question about them when asked. You're repeating something completely out of context and representing it as something that it's not.

if you don't have new info, please let this die. This is getting as ridiculous as the CFL thread or the timmy hasslebeck is our true answer at QB and we're set for life crap that came up a few years ago. collins is a scrub, and will be until he retires. maybe he'll win a couple games, but its obvious there's a reason he's never started more than one full season.

I think it was going to die until you revived it. I have posted the basic points of my argument in post #105. If you disagree, then that's your opinion - you don't need to convince me of anything.

[That Guy]

yet you absolutely need to have the last word :P
nice.

[warriorzpath]

Originally Posted by That Guy

yet you absolutely need to have the last word :P
nice.

Pot calling the kettle black.

[That Guy]

Originally Posted by warriorzpath

Pot calling the kettle black.

how ironic, eh? :P this was dead last night, yet you felt the need to respond specifically to my post with retread information you already posted 3 times for some reason. so, i'm sorry (actually i'm not) but i'd have to disagree with you yet again.

[warriorzpath]

Originally Posted by That Guy

how ironic, eh? :P this was dead last night, yet you felt the need to respond specifically to my post with retread information you already posted 3 times for some reason. so, i'm sorry (actually i'm not) but i'd have to disagree with you yet again.

see post #105. Yes I agree, that too is ironic.

[That Guy]

whats so magical about post 105? i already saw it and responded, and then you started yet another childish run of pointless posting instead of actually replying to any of the issues i raised.

whatever, have fun, you're pointless.

[warriorzpath]

Originally Posted by That Guy

whats so magical about post 105? i already saw it and responded, and then you started yet another childish run of pointless posting instead of actually replying to any of the issues i raised.

whatever, have fun, you're pointless.

What did you respond to ? Point #1 or #2 ?

[That Guy]

Originally Posted by warriorzpath

What did you respond to ? Point #1 or #2 ?

damn, did you even read my response? I said you blantantly misrepresented a quote that you took completely out of context and then decided it should be taken a gospel to top it off.

and are you really saying stats are worthless? is this huddle's new screen name? they magically make sense after watching someone, but are completely void beforehand? come on.

[warriorzpath]

Originally Posted by That Guy

damn, did you even read my response? I saide you blantantly misrepresented a quote that you took completely out of context and then decided it should be taken a gospel on top of that.

I did read your post and it wasn't arguing anything directly in what I posted in #105. I believe him (with what he says his opinion is) when he says Collins is as good a technician there is in this passing game and when he says he hasn't had a chance because of Trent Green.

There's nothing else to it in my mind.

[warriorzpath]

Originally Posted by That Guy

they magically make sense after watching someone, but are completely void beforehand? come on.

If they don't make sense then the stats don't accurately reflect the player's ability.

Do you judge players strictly by their stats before you even watch them play ?

I don't, I reserve judgment until I watch them play - this is just where you and I just differ.