![]() |
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Woodley Park, Washington DC
Age: 42
Posts: 937
|
Re: Bring on Mr. McIntosh, Warrick is Terrible in Coverage
We are slow on defense right now, that is the biggest problem. Mcintosh has speed, therefore play him, it's that simple
__________________
Dan Snyder is a Cancer, Joe Gibbs is the Cure |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: round the way
Age: 43
Posts: 2,211
|
Re: Bring on Mr. McIntosh, Warrick is Terrible in Coverage
Quote:
i think he will be 5 times better than holdman anyway, maybe not right now, but he will be
__________________
SOMEBODY PINCH ME |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: Bring on Mr. McIntosh, Warrick is Terrible in Coverage
Didn't Sean Taylor not start right away either? I mean I don't know that it's a fair assessment to say that because the player isn't starting from day one he's a bust. Doesn't make all that much sense to me to make that correlation
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: sparta, new jersey [ northern jersey ]
Age: 62
Posts: 3,097
|
Re: Bring on Mr. McIntosh, Warrick is Terrible in Coverage
True, but saftey is a little more complicated than weakside LB, a LB may get beat for a firstdown, where as a saftey gets beat it's a TD, more reads go along with the saftey position as well. I don't think Rocky is a bust but I do think at this point it doesn't make sense to play an inferior LB in Holdman ahead of Rocky, it's time for on the job training.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: ZOMGZZZ!!111
Age: 34
Posts: 1,160
|
Re: Bring on Mr. McIntosh, Warrick is Terrible in Coverage
i agree there. if anything, play an extra LB every now and then and at least get him in some game situations.
__________________
143 lbs of twisted steel and sex appeal. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Special Teams
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Nashville,TN
Age: 52
Posts: 474
|
Re: Bring on Mr. McIntosh, Warrick is Terrible in Coverage
McIntosh Is doin' his thing on special teams though. I think his speed will definitely be an asset with his coverage skills. Gregg Williams needs to come off his " I don't play rookies" high horse he's on! HAIL from MCUSA!
__________________
BEWARE THE MIDDLE............LaRON LANDRY IS LURKING! |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Camp Scrub
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 40
|
Re: Bring on Mr. McIntosh, Warrick is Terrible in Coverage
So much for bringing in McIntosh, I saw him mis a tackle on addia, that he was right in front of. He may be another bust.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Virginia Beach
Age: 52
Posts: 5,311
|
Re: Bring on Mr. McIntosh, Warrick is Terrible in Coverage
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 47
Posts: 8,317
|
Re: Bring on Mr. McIntosh, Warrick is Terrible in Coverage
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: Bring on Mr. McIntosh, Warrick is Terrible in Coverage
I noticed you had a typo in a post of yours back in August. We're thinking of banning you for life.
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 1,674
|
Re: Bring on Mr. McIntosh, Warrick is Terrible in Coverage
yea he played like 3 drives....plenty of time to see that he's a bust
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Fairfax, VA
Age: 50
Posts: 4,261
|
Re: Bring on Mr. McIntosh, Warrick is Terrible in Coverage
Quote:
If they lose tomorrow they should shake everything up. I am curious whether they will keep Vincent next year. It seems to me that he should be able to do the things that Clark did for Taylor last year (line him up, give him tips etc...). I am not saying that they will be buddies but Vincent seems like a good compliment to Taylor. Let Taylor seek and destroy while Vincent takes on more of the coverage duties. Hell, they should try Archuletta at LB, it couldn't hurt. I say change the whole deal. Go 3-4 with Carter and Archuletta as LB's. We need to get something out of that 60 million plus that was spent. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Camp Scrub
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 40
|
Re: Bring on Mr. McIntosh, Warrick is Terrible in Coverage
Now I know why they call you the Grimm Reaper. You went for the kill, within seconds.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Fairfax, VA
Age: 50
Posts: 4,261
|
Re: Bring on Mr. McIntosh, Warrick is Terrible in Coverage
Quote:
I was trying to think positive the other day so I e-mailed the Dexter on Danny White pic to some people. Someone asked me if that was a doll. I responded, "It was a quarterback when the ball was snapped". People say that it is bad to wish an injury. I don't want his career to end but if we put Romo out of the game, I would be the happiest guy on the east coast. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Special Teams
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Virginia Beach, VA
Age: 53
Posts: 114
|
Re: Bring on Mr. McIntosh, Warrick is Terrible in Coverage
It was said on the radio a few weeks ago that Rocky made too many scheme mistakes in practice. I hope he has got it down now, because they need his talent in the lineup. Holdman can't tackle!
__________________
A fool finds no pleasure in understanding but delights in airing his own opinions. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|