![]() |
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: Sam Bradford remains projected pick to Redskins
Have you heard he's interested in Leinart from any other source than here? Shanahan liked Leinart when he was available in the draft and reportedly tried to trade up for him. And there is speculation that Leinart is someone they would consider if the Cardinals make him available, which they may not.
But regardless, is making a trade for Leinart who has accomplished far less than Campbell (and is I believe the same age) really a better move than just keeping Campbell or better yet drafting a QB out of college? It's not a lock we'll run the 3-4
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
MVP
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: lancaster,pa
Age: 64
Posts: 10,672
|
Re: Sam Bradford remains projected pick to Redskins
Quote:
__________________
"It's better to be quiet and thought a fool than to open ones mouth and remove all doubt." courtesy of 53fan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 4,712
|
Re: Sam Bradford remains projected pick to Redskins
Quote:
We've spent the last 8-9 years developing 1st round QBs from scratch and it hasnt worked out for us. I'd rather go with something a bit "safer" in 2010. Regarding the 3-4, i imagine we'll know alot more about that a week from now. Even if we stick with the 4-3, i'd still put the 6 needs i listed on offense, along with a SLB and 1-2 CB's above FS in my list of team priorities. So in that case, FS would be my 9th or 10th most important team need... its a need that i could address through FA, a late round pick, or ignore entirely until 2011 and be pretty happy with my team assuming i addressed my other needs. FS and RB are the absolute last positions i'd address with a top 5 pick.
__________________
Dolphins get good press for saving drowning humans.But we only hear about the swimmers theyve pushed ashore.You know who we havent heard from: all the people theyve pushed out to sea.Dolphins dont know what theyre doing-they just like pushing things. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Special Teams
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 116
|
Re: Sam Bradford remains projected pick to Redskins
In the 2010 draft we need to draft olineman with our first few picks, if you ask me, the only two lineman we will bring back are Rabach and Dockery, everyone else is a question mark. Fill out the oline first if it isn't addressed via free agency. A quarterback wouldn't be a terrible idea to allow the new coach to groom and possibly light a fire under Campbell if we bring him back. Then hopefully he can find a RB, CB, and FS with our day two picks.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: Sam Bradford remains projected pick to Redskins
"Most important, Shanahan completely devoured the West Coast offense. Then he added his own twists, like more deep passes"
PRO FOOTBALL - PRO FOOTBALL; Shanahan Dares to Be Great - NYTimes.com
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Special Teams
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Harrisburg, PA
Posts: 190
|
Re: Sam Bradford remains projected pick to Redskins
I'm trying real hard to understand the, "We need a quarterback in the first couple of rounds" logic. I'm not trying to insult those of you who believe we should draft a QB, I'm just saying that I don't understand it. Campbell falls right in the middle of almost all NFL QBs statistically. If you think anyone else would have done better this year you're taking crazy pills. I'd like to have a top 5 QB too, but we have no idea what we're going to end up with. Imagine spending the next 3 years trying to groom a JaMarcus Russell. JC may not be the long term answer but he can certainly help get the Redskins through the rebuilding phase. Why don't we replace the players who suck instead of replacing the players who are average? Can anyone say, with a straight face, that we need to replace the QB before we address several line positions, at least one RB or a secondary that got us a whopping 10 interceptions so far this year? You have to take the best player in any of those three areas first. Shouldn't the horrible areas of the team be addressed before the average areas are??
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: Sam Bradford remains projected pick to Redskins
Quote:
We shouldn't draft a offensive lineman in the first round just to say we drafted one. At at #5 if Okung isn't the guy we take then that's basically what we're doing.
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Special Teams
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Harrisburg, PA
Posts: 190
|
Re: Sam Bradford remains projected pick to Redskins
^ I actually think that with an average line and an average supporting cast Campbell might be more productive. I can't say for sure, but he deserves a chance to compete at the very least. If Okung is gone then I wouldn't mind picking up Spiller or Berry, not a QB.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Harrisburg, PA
Age: 42
Posts: 2,726
|
Re: Sam Bradford remains projected pick to Redskins
Quote:
__________________
"I would change that around, Jesus isn't Cutler. I guarantee you Jesus couldnt thread the ball like Jay does."-Monksdown |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Special Teams
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Harrisburg, PA
Posts: 190
|
Re: Sam Bradford remains projected pick to Redskins
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 | |
|
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: Sam Bradford remains projected pick to Redskins
Quote:
Spiller would be very exciting (though I think I slightly, very, slightly prefer Best). Still, I'd be kind of curious to see what Alridge can bring to the table given the opportunity. And combine that with drafting Dwyer-we'd have to trade into the 2nd probably-I would like that Berry is a total stud...but I don't want to draft anymore DBs right now. Other than maybe LB, I'd rather not draft any defensive players. I think too much of a fuss is being made about Bradford's shoulder injury. You'd think he had his arm amputated the way some talk about it
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | ||
|
Naega jeil jal naga
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlanta, Georgia From: Silver Spring, Maryland
Age: 40
Posts: 14,750
|
Re: Sam Bradford remains projected pick to Redskins
Quote:
Plus the most telling stat is probably what Shannahan was able to do with Cutler in his rookie year with an 88 rating in the 5 games he started his rookie year. I fear that even if we make the playoffs with JC we won't be able to even make it to the NFC championship let alone win the Super Bowl. Keep in mind this is a team that wants to win a Super Bowl, not simply make the playoffs. I know it's been beaten to death but I don't want to settle for mediocrity. If we're going to be a championship contender year in and year out we're going to need a true franchise QB. The kind of guy that makes you feel like the Saints, Colts, Steelers, and Patriots feel every week they go into a game. All thats left is to have our competent front office decide if we can develop that guy into the player we need him to be. Also as Smoot has said before Drew Brees had similar shoulder problems going into free agency Quote:
__________________
"It's nice to be important, but its more important to be nice." - Scooter "I feel like Dirtbag has been slowly and methodically trolling the board for a month or so now." - FRPLG |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 38
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: Sam Bradford remains projected pick to Redskins
Quote:
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Special Teams
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Harrisburg, PA
Posts: 190
|
Re: Sam Bradford remains projected pick to Redskins
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Detroit area
Posts: 4,153
|
Re: Sam Bradford remains projected pick to Redskins
Quote:
I can answer your question with one simple word, and that word is depth. Collins might hang it up or should, and Brennan is a bust. Give me a Pike, Stull, Lefevour, Canfield, Sheehan, or Todd over Brennan. Shoot I would want Joey Elliot of Purdue or even a Mike Kafka from Northwestern before Brennan. Plus JC might split dude. You are right, JC is what ranked 15 or something in passing and a lot of teams have shitty QBs like Cleveland or Oakland. JC might be a good backup for other teams or "insurance" for others still. Either way you need a QB, maybe even two if Collins bolts. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|