![]() |
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Pacifica, CA
Posts: 15,164
|
Re: Redskins Trade Jeremy Jarmon
Bad trade. Why trade for a WR on the downside of his career? Clear salary cap space?
__________________
Joe Gibbs- The best coach of all time, Lombardi trophy should be renamed Gibbs. Art Monk- Art was like an OL playing WR, doing the dirty work and not getting the glory. Darrell Green- Best DB ever. Purveyor of fine Filth |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Gamebreaker
![]() Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 13,237
|
Re: Redskins Trade Jeremy Jarmon
Quote:
I don't think it is a bad trade. They simply traded two "meh" players amongst themselves. Now what is interesting is that the Skins made a trade like this during one of the busiest weeks in NFL history. Why do this trade now? Shouldn't we being using our resources on bigger fish this week? Or this all to step up something bigger?
__________________
When life gives you paper jams, turn them into paper footballs! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: chesapeake, va
Age: 62
Posts: 15,817
|
Re: Redskins Trade Jeremy Jarmon
Maybe we are going back to the "old Ball Coach" days Fun 'N' Gun and F&ck O line.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 608
|
Re: Redskins Trade Jeremy Jarmon
Not sure we needed yet another WR but if Jarmon did not fit into our plans why not get someone who was productive last year and someone we can also cut at no expense?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 6,052
|
Re: Redskins Trade Jeremy Jarmon
Larger roster for TC.
Weak position. Need for competition. "Dual mandate" I'm not as surprised as some others.
__________________
Analysis using datasets (aka stats) is an attempt at reverse-engineering a player's "goodness". Virtuosity remembered, douchebaggery forgotten. The ideal character profile shoved down modern Western men and women's throats is Don Juan. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: Redskins Trade Jeremy Jarmon
Well, his numbers have improved each of the last four years
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Warpath Hall of Fame
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: UNITED STATES
Age: 39
Posts: 36,242
|
Re: Redskins Trade Jeremy Jarmon
I don't understand the trade that much either but o well
__________________
“Mediocre people don’t like high achievers, and high achievers don’t like mediocre people.” ― Nick Saban |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Hail Raiser
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 100,050
|
Re: Redskins Trade Jeremy Jarmon
Traded for a guy who probably wasn't going to make the final cut here anyway.
Win. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Norfolk, Va (OV)
Posts: 1,566
|
Re: Redskins Trade Jeremy Jarmon
The problem people have with this is that Jarmon was selected in the supplemental draft equating to more wasted draft picks.
__________________
'Any NFL team will win with RG3. Imagine how exciting it will be watching him do it.' |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 7,766
|
Re: Redskins Trade Jeremy Jarmon
Quote:
Can we all look at it this way..... Your refering to a different regime, a regime that was allowed to 10yrs to pull those types of crappy moves. I just wish we all could find a way to seperate the two. Allen has been doing a fine job so far. As a matter of fact I was actually happy to hear that the Skins were well below the CAP and was supprised at how far since usually we are worried about how they will finagle the contracts they already have in order to make room. Then the new CBA comes along and they have to spend a certain % of each dollar on players I figured this will be fun to see how they find a way to spend all the dollars. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Hug Anne Spyder
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 20,596
|
Re: Redskins Trade Jeremy Jarmon
Whose to say Gaffney will make the final cut either? I'd rather we traded Jarmon for some line help. Good teams build from the lines out, and so far all of our offensive moves have involved skill players, while we still have effectively the same offensive line from last year.
__________________
Hail to the Football Team |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Hail Raiser
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 100,050
|
Re: Redskins Trade Jeremy Jarmon
Gaffney could start tomorrow if there was a game. I think he's got a solid shot to make the roster, much more so than JJ.
The OL moves will come. I don't see hardly any OL moves going on around the league. They'll start to happen later on in the week. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 4,540
|
Re: Redskins Trade Jeremy Jarmon
I understand that Jarmon wasn't an ideal fit in the 3-4 but I'd hoped he could stay as a nickel DE. He has a lot of upside & like Smoot said he did whatever was asked. If he stays healthy he can start for a no. of years.
Gaffney is a solid vet WR, I just would hate to see him take a spot from one of the rookies before they've had enough of a chance. Training camp will be intense at that position. |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Germantown, Md.
Posts: 4,832
|
Re: Redskins Trade Jeremy Jarmon
We're being introduced to the new and improved method of rebuilding. Our young receivers psyche is already spinning.
__________________
A revolution is coming and it will be televised. |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Quietly Dominating the East
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Naples, Florida
Posts: 10,675
|
Re: Redskins Trade Jeremy Jarmon
The Skins.......TRADED a player?
Is......that....legal?
__________________
Goodbye Sean..........Vaya Con Dios thankyou Joe....... “God made certain people to play football. He was one of them.” – Joe Gibbs |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|