![]() |
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: RGIII Named Starter
Should also be noted that it's 1st team offense vs. 2nd team defense, and 2nd team offense vs. 1st team defense
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Queens, NYC
Age: 57
Posts: 3,803
|
Re: RGIII Named Starter
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Holland, Michigan
Posts: 5,741
|
Re: RGIII Named Starter
Whens the last time a rookie QB with this much hoohaa has been named the starter so early in the season?
Anyone know? And did it work out?
__________________
REDSKINS FAN SINCE 1968 |
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Fire Bruce NOW
![]() Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Hattiesburg, MS
Posts: 11,434
|
Re: RGIII Named Starter
Crompton is the clear starter. They're just giving Griffin reps so that his feelings don't get hurt. Crompton is such a stud that he needs no reps.
__________________
Bruce Allen when in charge alone: 4-12 (.250) Bruce Allen's overall Redskins record : 28-52 (.350) Vinny Cerrato's record when in charge alone: 52-65 (.444) Vinny's overall Redskins record: 62-82 (.430) We won more with Vinny |
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Hug Anne Spyder
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 20,615
|
Re: RGIII Named Starter
I know you love the Crompton but you need to give a little more respect to Rex Grossman. Remember, that is the guy who beat out John friggin Beck for a starting job last season. He's shown an ability to win when faced with an underdog role.
__________________
Hail to the Football Team |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Charleston , SC
Posts: 5,001
|
Re: RGIII Named Starter
Pretty sure Cam Newton was named an early starter.
__________________
Just win. |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: PA
Age: 47
Posts: 17,460
|
Re: RGIII Named Starter
He wasn't officially named starter until August actually. He was struggling in camp but lit up the defenses when the regular season started.
__________________
Not sent from a Droid, iPhone, Blackberry or toaster |
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Aug 2008
Age: 59
Posts: 21,745
|
Re: RGIII Named Starter
Quote:
Eli didn't start his first game, neither did Roethlisberger |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 7,766
|
Re: RGIII Named Starter
Well more recently wouldn't we say Stafford was named early on? I was going to say Andy Dalton but if I'm not mistaken I think he had to win the job... maybe not. How about Sanchez? didn't the take him right after Favre left.
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 4,540
|
Re: RGIII Named Starter
Shanny might say that he doesn't pay attention to the press & public reaction, and maybe he doesen't, but naming RGIII the starter so early seems in part designed to avoid any talk of qb controversy.
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Queens, NYC
Age: 57
Posts: 3,803
|
Re: RGIII Named Starter
IMO MS knows RG3's shoulders can handle the weight, MS likes/loves how he carries himself.
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Hail Raiser
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 100,121
|
Re: RGIII Named Starter
You don't give up what the Skins did for him and not plug him in as the starter on day 1.
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 17,657
|
Re: RGIII Named Starter
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Hail Raiser
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 100,121
|
Re: RGIII Named Starter
Shanahan also said they will adjust the offense to suit RG3, and they're not going to toss the entire playbook at him, I know some were concerned about those things.
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: KY
Age: 57
Posts: 1,559
|
Re: RGIII Named Starter
Mike Shannahan is putting his whole future on RGIII by naming him the starter. Once the draft trade went down the way it did in March he knew this was the way it was going to be. Either they both succeed together or Mike will be gone for failing to win with another QB. Somehow I think this time it will work.
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|