Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


London Fletcher leaning towards playing in 2013 (updated)

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-11-2013, 12:13 PM   #1
firstdown
Living Legend
 
firstdown's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: chesapeake, va
Age: 62
Posts: 15,817
Re: London Fletcher leaning towards playing in 2013 (updated)

Quote:
Originally Posted by REDSKINS4ever;997325[B
]The Redskins were only two safeties away from being a 15-1 team last year[/B]. With the additions on offense last year with the use of free agency and the draft, it produced the 4th ranked NFL offense. The Redskins had true explosion on offense. We also went 5-1 in the division and were 1:17 seconds away from being a perfect 6-0 in the division. The Redskins were in every game they played in last yet except the Pittsburgh game. The offense also produced over 400 points, something it hasn't done since 1999. 5 of the Redskins 6 losses were by 7 points or less. The Redskins have drafted well for three years straight(about to be 4 years straight) and this team is almost totally rebuilt. The only reason the Redskins didn't inch further in the playoffs was because of Robert's ailing knee injury. I strongly disagree with your assessment that the Redskins are still far away from competing for a SB championship.
That might be stretching it a bit.
firstdown is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2013, 07:24 PM   #2
REDSKINS4ever
Playmaker
 
REDSKINS4ever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Washington, D.C.
Posts: 4,117
Re: London Fletcher leaning towards playing in 2013 (updated)

Quote:
Originally Posted by firstdown View Post
That might be stretching it a bit.
Maybe the part of what I said about the Redskins being 15-1, but the rest of what I said is pretty accurate.
__________________
Touchdown Washington Redskins!!!
REDSKINS4ever is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2013, 09:54 PM   #3
MTK
Hail Raiser
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 100,050
Re: London Fletcher leaning towards playing in 2013 (updated)

We went 10-6 with a rookie QB and some key injuries, and a shaky D.

How do we go from that to being 3-4 years away?
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2013, 10:01 PM   #4
Chief X_Phackter
Pro Bowl
 
Chief X_Phackter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Lakewood, CO
Posts: 5,644
Re: London Fletcher leaning towards playing in 2013 (updated)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk View Post
We went 10-6 with a rookie QB and some key injuries, and a shaky D.

How do we go from that to being 3-4 years away?
I think he meant 3-4 years away from our 3rd or 4th superbowl appearance in a row.

But maybe I misinterpreted him.
Chief X_Phackter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2013, 10:15 PM   #5
mbedner3420
The Starter
 
mbedner3420's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,900
Re: London Fletcher leaning towards playing in 2013 (updated)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk View Post
We went 10-6 with a rookie QB and some key injuries, and a shaky D.

How do we go from that to being 3-4 years away?
How many other teams could have said the same thing, though? It takes a considerable amount of luck to win a super bowl. Don't get me wrong, I think well have a winning record consistently for those years, I just think it'll take us 3-4 years to get over the top...

Again, just my personal opinion.
mbedner3420 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2013, 10:20 PM   #6
MTK
Hail Raiser
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 100,050
Re: London Fletcher leaning towards playing in 2013 (updated)

Quote:
Originally Posted by mbedner3420 View Post
How many other teams could have said the same thing, though? It takes a considerable amount of luck to win a super bowl. Don't get me wrong, I think well have a winning record consistently for those years, I just think it'll take us 3-4 years to get over the top...

Again, just my personal opinion.
I'm not even talking SB, I'll wait to see how the rest of the offseason goes and of course RG3's recovery.

But I do think we can be back in the playoffs and be just as competitive as last year.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2013, 10:25 PM   #7
mbedner3420
The Starter
 
mbedner3420's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,900
Re: London Fletcher leaning towards playing in 2013 (updated)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk View Post
I'm not even talking SB, I'll wait to see how the rest of the offseason goes and of course RG3's recovery.

But I do think we can be back in the playoffs and be just as competitive as last year.
I was never arguing whether we'd be competitive, my point was if fletcher is coming back because he thinks we're winning a superbowl next year, he should prepare for disappointment...
mbedner3420 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2013, 10:37 PM   #8
MTK
Hail Raiser
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 100,050
Re: London Fletcher leaning towards playing in 2013 (updated)

Quote:
Originally Posted by mbedner3420 View Post
I was never arguing whether we'd be competitive, my point was if fletcher is coming back because he thinks we're winning a superbowl next year, he should prepare for disappointment...
You asked a few post back who in their right mind thinks we can compete this year. It seemed like you you were saying we can't compete at all let alone for the SB.

I also don't agree that the front office has already tossed in the towel. Even with the cap penalty by bringing back our key free agents they're at least trying to keep the core of the team together, and we'll have a chance to improve with the draft as well. Not making a big splash in free agency isn't necessarily a bad thing.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2013, 10:26 PM   #9
CultBrennan59
Pro Bowl
 
CultBrennan59's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 6,526
Re: London Fletcher leaning towards playing in 2013 (updated)

It all depends on young RG3 and our health. I think we can contend this year assuming RG3 starts the first game (no later than the 3rd game) and isn't rattled in the pocket like Tom Brady was when he first came back from his ACL injury. Even if Roberts like what he was in week 17 against Dallas and progressively gets better, we'll be in good shape, because he'll also know the offense better than he did last year.

Its really health of the whole team and losing key guys (Like a Fletcher should Keenan not work out). Orakpo was out most of last year, so that is a major reason our defense sucked in terms of giving up lots of passing yards. Orakpo back makes us better and a bigger contender right there.
__________________
"Anyones better than Madieu Williams"
CultBrennan59 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2013, 10:33 PM   #10
CRedskinsRule
Living Legend
 
CRedskinsRule's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Age: 59
Posts: 21,744
Quote:
Originally Posted by mbedner3420 View Post
I was never arguing whether we'd be competitive, my point was if fletcher is coming back because he thinks we're winning a superbowl next year, he should prepare for disappointment...
LF has been to a SB, he knows what it takes. I think if he thought this team was 3-4 years away, he would retire right now. He also knows that a SB victory is only achieved by one team so I doubt he would be unprepared for it if we didn't win. I think he believes we are good enough to get in the playoffs, and once in anything can happen.
CRedskinsRule is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2013, 10:36 PM   #11
mbedner3420
The Starter
 
mbedner3420's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,900
Re: London Fletcher leaning towards playing in 2013 (updated)

Fair enough, if we win next year, please feel free to mark this comment threat so you can mock me later
mbedner3420 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2013, 10:39 PM   #12
skinsfaninok
Warpath Hall of Fame
 
skinsfaninok's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: UNITED STATES
Age: 39
Posts: 36,242
Quote:
Originally Posted by mbedner3420 View Post
How many other teams could have said the same thing, though? It takes a considerable amount of luck to win a super bowl. Don't get me wrong, I think well have a winning record consistently for those years, I just think it'll take us 3-4 years to get over the top...

Again, just my personal opinion.
I see what your saying, even Dallas won 13 games a few years back. It takes enough talent and luck to be a SB team, I think if Griff is healthy all year then we should repeat as division champs and win at least 10 games again.
__________________
“Mediocre people don’t like high achievers, and high achievers don’t like mediocre people.”
― Nick Saban
skinsfaninok is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2013, 09:16 AM   #13
MTK
Hail Raiser
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 100,050
Re: London Fletcher leaning towards playing in 2013 (updated)

If we had the '85 Bears defense we might have gone 15-1.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2013, 10:15 AM   #14
InsaneBoost
The Starter
 
InsaneBoost's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: DC
Age: 38
Posts: 1,300
Re: London Fletcher leaning towards playing in 2013 (updated)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk View Post
If we had the '85 Bears defense we might have gone 15-1.
Would rather have the Steelers defense of the 70's. 10 years > 1, even then though, I think most teams would probably have gone 15-1 too, or close to it. Especially in the NFC East.
__________________

InsaneBoost is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2013, 11:04 AM   #15
RedskinRat
Franchise Player
 
RedskinRat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: I'm in LA, trick!
Posts: 8,700
Re: London Fletcher leaning towards playing in 2013 (updated)

Quote:
Originally Posted by InsaneBoost View Post
Would rather have the Steelers defense of the 70's. 10 years > 1, even then though, I think most teams would probably have gone 15-1 too, or close to it. Especially in the NFC East.
Those old school defenses couldn't survive the new rule changes. They'd all be suspended by week 3.
RedskinRat is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:44 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.52120 seconds with 10 queries