![]() |
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 | |
|
Special Teams
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Virginia
Posts: 319
|
Re: Looking ahead to the Eagles
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 1,066
|
Re: Looking ahead to the Eagles
Quote:
Im on a high horse because I dont buy into your strawman? Or just that I disagree with you is why im on a high horse? You have made it clear that you think anyone that doesnt agree with you is somehow flawed. Im not the one on the high horse. If someone wants to disagree with me, let them. Im not here to stop them from disagreeing with me. Doesnt mean I cant put out an opinion and people can disagree with me if they want. You already accused me of trying to start an argument earlier and now you are accusing me of being arrogant because I dont agree with you. Yes, I think rewriting the game plan from the first two games going into a Thursday game was stupid. Deal with it. If you want to debate that, then lets do it. You obviously want to debate this as you keep responding. But stop trying to mandate my opinion for me or claiming im arrogant when I dont immediately change my opinion to match yours. If you cant handle disagreement, then being online is the wrong place for you. You think a game plan where KC passes 50 times a game is good. I do not, especially going into a short week. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | ||
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,323
|
Re: Looking ahead to the Eagles
Quote:
Quote:
Pointing out that the run game was our strength and should be the focal point of the offense is simply an objective observation. Same with playing inadequate players at punt protector when there are superior players avaiable on the roster, same with PR/KR, same with Roberts on 3rd down same with Carrier/Reed blocking DEs 1-on-1. I'm sorry if discussing these coaching mistakes makes you uncomfortable and forced to resort to hyperbole/strawmen. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 822
|
Re: Looking ahead to the Eagles
In the NFL, the home team wins about 57% of the time. On Thursday night games, this goes up to 60%. When you are a flawed team, on the road, on Thursday night, you will lose.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Special Teams
Join Date: Jun 2015
Age: 56
Posts: 226
|
Re: Looking ahead to the Eagles
It does eventually get down to the players but Gruden is a subpar head coach in over his head.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 17,592
|
Re: Looking ahead to the Eagles
By my count we're down 9 players? Maybe 10? ..Jackson, SL, Galette, Nacho, Hall, Riley, Paulsen, Heyward, Paul...maybe Culliver. An already below average team can not overcome that.
i'm taking a guess that either Paul or Heyward would have been in there on punt protection over the rookie. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Warpath Hall of Fame
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 35,307
|
Re: Looking ahead to the Eagles
This is a game we should win. Kinda surprised by folks who say otherwise, I guess they haven't seen the Eagles play. Injuries aren't an excuse in this league...skins at home, wet weather, against a division rival who is struggling on offense and defense...folks I expect Jay gruden to lead this team to a win....and long week to prepare too? Eagles play really gud special teams we have to be ready, but we should with good coaching.
Looking for the w
__________________
My pronouns: King/Your ruler He Gets Us |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Hanahan, South Carolina
Age: 43
Posts: 20,874
|
Re: Looking ahead to the Eagles
Please never put Georgia in the top 10 unless they are at least 10-0. That team can never win the big game. Getting merked at home by a solid but not great Bama team.
If we lose to Philly our season is over for playoffs, don't see us beating Atlanta and 1-4 is no bueno. And no I didn't expect playoffs, just mentioning it. I was hoping for 8-8. I'd settle for 7-9. For some reason 6-10 and 7-9 seems like such a HUGE difference. Just get to at least 7 wins please. 3 win increase from last year is solid improvement.
__________________
"You can be my wingman anytime." "Bulls**t. You can be mine." |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Camp Scrub
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 72
|
Re: Looking ahead to the Eagles
This is the game the wheels fall off...Eagles give us a beat down and the team can't recover the rest of the season... 35-10 Eagles.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 2,877
|
Re: Looking ahead to the Eagles
SKINS 28 filly 17 !
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
I like big (_|_)s.
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Charlottesville, Virginia
Age: 44
Posts: 19,264
|
Re: Looking ahead to the Eagles
I'll tell you one thing that WON'T happen: one team will not win without the other one sucking major balls. If we win, it's because the Eagles self-destruct and vice versa. Would be nice to watch two teams slug it out and talent trump crazy-shit-happening-because-that's-Redskins-football and the best team come out on top.
I think we win if we can prevent Sam Bradford from having a "get back on track" game. We're good for getting people in a rhythm. Defense is still impressing me, but not quite good enough yet. Can't predict a score, but if we have NO fuck-ups (INTs, lost fumbles, ST miscues) I think we win. Seems like it shouldn't be a ton to ask.
__________________
Regret nothing. At one time it was exactly what you wanted. |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Aug 2008
Age: 59
Posts: 21,744
|
Re: Looking ahead to the Eagles
In my opinion we have better lines on both sides of the ball. I just don't trust we can not beat ourselves.
It may be a very ugly game. Sent from my S6 Edge |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,323
|
Re: Looking ahead to the Eagles
Finally...the 3rd and 2 pass call--
I don't have a problem with the call itself. The concept and play design was sound just poorly executed. But that is the risk you take with a pass play in that situation. More has to go right for a pass play to work then a run play. There are reasons why passing is lower efficiency then running, passing failure rates are MUCH higher then runs. And early in the game for a team that fancies itself a run team that was an opportunity to establish the run game. Further historically the fact remains that we were better running the ball on 3rd and 2 or less then we are passing the ball; that was a fact last year. Now fast forward to this year. We have been improved OL and OL coach. And we were able to run the ball effectively against the Rams D and 8 man front and the Rams DL is better then the Giants. So for me the high efficiency play is to run the ball and we didn't and it failed. |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,323
|
Re: Looking ahead to the Eagles
It's was a low efficiency play call that could possibly have a higher yield then a run. But that 1st 3rd and 2 situation call more for efficiency then big yards.
To each theirs.... Anyhow cheers to a win today! |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|