Trayvon Martin Case

[RedskinRat]

Justice in action. Done.

Now we will hear all the crap that was covered up by the media, can't wait to see Nancy Grace explode.

[saden1]

Wow...what a travesty. Those I owe money message me your paypal info.

[JoeRedskin]

Cue wrongful death suit.

[HailGreen28]

Originally Posted by JoeRedskin

Cue wrongful death suit.

What are the odds (your guess) on Zimmerman being guilty there?

edit: And any word on the jurors saying why they acquitted? (evidence, lack of, one side very believable or not?, ????)

[saden1]

Originally Posted by JoeRedskin

Cue wrongful death suit.

Does he even have anything worth going after?

[FRPLG]

Originally Posted by saden1

Does he even have anything worth going after?

Doesn't matter...I'd sue his pants off. Wrongful death is exactly what this was.

[RedskinRat]

And riots.

[JoeRedskin]

I would assume not much.
I also assume he will lose his shirt.

[JoeRedskin]

HG28 - You aren't found "guilty" in a civil suit. You are found liable. For those of us who don't study law at Holiday Inns, it is a significant difference.

I am glad that, at least some folks, still take the presumption of innocence seriously.

[HailGreen28]

Originally Posted by JoeRedskin

HG28 - You aren't found "guilty" in a civil suit. You are found liable. For those of us who don't study law at Holiday Inns, it is a significant difference.

I am glad that, at least some folks, still take the presumption of innocence seriously.

Ouch, you're right, sorry.

[NC_Skins]

Originally Posted by JoeRedskin

HG28 - You aren't found "guilty" in a civil suit. You are found liable. For those of us who don't study law at Holiday Inns, it is a significant difference.

I am glad that, at least some folks, still take the presumption of innocence seriously.

Speaking of....I had you in mind when I posted this on twitter.



NC_Skins ‏@NC_Skins23

The ignorance spewed on twitter by "Holiday Inn Express" lawyers in regards to justice is laughable.

[skinsfaninok]

I disagree with it but glad it's,over

[RedskinRat]

I would also hope that States with 'Stand your ground' laws review it, it needs some manner of tweak.

[HailGreen28]

Originally Posted by RedskinRat

I would also hope that States with 'Stand your ground' laws review it, it needs some manner of tweak.

Tweaking for this case or a case like this? (link embedded below). And tweaked in what way?

The South Carolina Supreme Court had made the unusual move of halting a murder trial to hold a hearing on the state’s so-called “stand your ground” law — but it’s who’s claiming the defense that’s likely to turn heads: an armed intruder who shot and killed the man whose home he broke into.
Gregg Isaac testified in court this week that he entered the apartment of Antonio Corbitt in 2005 with another man, Tavares World, after World kicked in the door, The State newspaper reported. Isaac testified that as World and Corbitt fought, it looked like Corbitt was going to pull a gun and shoot Isaac, so instead, Isaac shot Corbitt twice. Corbitt stumbled outside and died.
Isaac said he also feared for his life from World, because World had threatened to kill him unless he went along with him.
Isaac’s defense attorney Mark Schnee argued that his client should be granted immunity from prosecution because South Carolina’s 2006 “stand your ground” law allows people to use deadly force if they fear for their lives.

[CultBrennan59]

No surprise that Zimmerman got off. Self defense is a sneaky way of getting out of the law in terms of murder/manslaughter.