Mega-Merge: 2010 Free Agency Rumors and Reports Thread

[Chico23231]

Originally Posted by ChickenMonkey

Changing the subject from necessary and enjoyable critiques of the Giants, Pashos signed with the Browns:
Source: Tony Pashos strikes three-year, $10.3 million deal with Browns - NFL - Yahoo! Sports

Losing Pashos for $3.5m a year is the first Shanahanian move that I don't like.

Im not sold on this front office, they are doing piss poor job of fixing an offensive line. I dont see many FA OT left. Unless they plan to go OT 2 of the 5 draft picks, were going into the next year in the same position as 2009....And even if they do, youre hoping 2 rookies come in and start right away......Reaks of a slow rebuilding process[/QUOTE]




Calm down...Pashos blows anyway, Clifton would have been a better signing than him. Hicks signing was a good move. Look there isnt a lot out there to choose from and honestly I love the fact we seemed to be focused on the one area being overlooked for the last 5 years.........Good job Allen

[12thMan]

Giantone, my apologies I made an error. The Giants yielded 40 points or more five times, not three. Sorry for the confusion.

12th

[skinsfaninok]

LOL How did this turn into a Bashing of the Giants?

[NYCskinfan82]

Originally Posted by skinsfaninok

LOL How did this turn into a Bashing of the Giants?

Real easy, see what ad happened was. LOL

[SBXVII]

Sorry 12th. Maybe I quoted the wrong person. It looked like you were writing it. Then after I posted my comment quoting what I thought was yours I see that you were refering to someone elses comments. I think.

[SBXVII]

Your's did the same thing mine did when I tried to quote what I thought was your statement. The site blended my quote with your statement. LOL.

[diehard]

I'm really nervous about the holes we have on the team right now. There's not a lot of quality UFAs and the team cannot afford to lose draft picks. Tendering Rodgers and McIntosh could bring interest.

[Pocket$ $traight]

Originally Posted by diehard

I'm really nervous about the holes we have on the team right now. There's not a lot of quality UFAs and the team cannot afford to lose draft picks. Tendering Rodgers and McIntosh could bring interest.

If we lose Rocky and Carlos then we have holes at linebacker and corner.

[Bushead]

It's going to have to be a slow rebuilding process because this team needs lots of pieces. As we have seen, just going out and picking 3 or 4 people who are the best of just one free agent year is not the way to build prolonged success.

Many of the free agents who were out there were around the 30 years old. So they can play at a high level for another 3-4 years? The skins do just need to take it slow and draft some lineman and pick and choose where in free agency to do something.

Even if they went out and got every offensive lineman available, our center is still suspect, our RG is suspect, our QB is a question mark, we don't have much at RB or FB, we have unproven WR with a declining Moss, and for defense a poor secondary.

It's going to take a while guys.

[GusFrerotte]

Originally Posted by Bushead

It's going to have to be a slow rebuilding process because this team needs lots of pieces. As we have seen, just going out and picking 3 or 4 people who are the best of just one free agent year is not the way to build prolonged success.

Many of the free agents who were out there were around the 30 years old. So they can play at a high level for another 3-4 years? The skins do just need to take it slow and draft some lineman and pick and choose where in free agency to do something.

Even if they went out and got every offensive lineman available, our center is still suspect, our RG is suspect, our QB is a question mark, we don't have much at RB or FB, we have unproven WR with a declining Moss, and for defense a poor secondary.

It's going to take a while guys.

I agree. 2-3 seasons in my book, and that is if our present WR corp develops, a big if in my opinion. Moss is on the decline. I would consider using him as possible trade bait. Highly unlikely someone will take him though.

[PHazard]

Real Redskins:

RT @NandoGroup: @SI_PeterKing I'm hearing that LT wants to play for the #Redskins, that's from a Charger guy here in SD that works with LT


So LT or Willie Parker guys?

[Lotus]

Originally Posted by PHazard

Real Redskins:

RT @NandoGroup: @SI_PeterKing I'm hearing that LT wants to play for the #Redskins, that's from a Charger guy here in SD that works with LT


So LT or Willie Parker guys?

Neither. But if I had to take one, I'd take Parker. LT has not been LT in some time.

[SBXVII]

Any RB would be crazy not to want to be in Shanahan's scheme since they have produced 1000+ yards runners every year. It would go a long way to prove to people your not as bad as everyone thinks you are.

[SirClintonPortis]

Originally Posted by SBXVII

Any RB would be crazy not to want to be in Shanahan's scheme since they have produced 1000+ yards runners every year. It would go a long way to prove to people your not as bad as everyone thinks you are.

More like it overstates the RB's ability and understates the OL's contribution...until the RB goes elsewhere.
Portis and Terrell Davis were exceptions, but they were also exceptional statistically in the system as well.

[diehard]

The reality is that the new FO had nothing to do with setting the FA market and the cuts made to the current roster were right on point with needs to be filled throughout the draft.