Predict our first major player acquisition

Schneed10 · 03-09-2006, 04:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mattyk72

Seems to me we debated all last offseason about needing a big WR last year and look what happened, Moss sets the team record for receiving.

What I want is a productive WR across from Moss, regardless of height, which is vastly overrated if you ask me.

Thank you for saying what I was unable to say due to an uncontrollable desire to strangle #56fanatic.

#56fanatic, it's not about agreeing with me. It's that your argument flat out made no sense. You said Bruce was too old and on the downside of his career, yet advocated for Moulds even though he's only one year younger. You said Bruce was small, but he's friggin 6 feet tall. It's not about agreeing with me, it's about forming a coherent argument. You come on the board all the time with knowledge that you think is right, and you don't even check your facts. It bothers the heck out of me. And until you stop doing it, I'm going to roundhouse kick you all over these message boards.

#56fanatic · 03-10-2006, 11:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Schneed10

Thank you for saying what I was unable to say due to an uncontrollable desire to strangle #56fanatic.

#56fanatic, it's not about agreeing with me. It's that your argument flat out made no sense. You said Bruce was too old and on the downside of his career, yet advocated for Moulds even though he's only one year younger. You said Bruce was small, but he's friggin 6 feet tall. It's not about agreeing with me, it's about forming a coherent argument. You come on the board all the time with knowledge that you think is right, and you don't even check your facts. It bothers the heck out of me. And until you stop doing it, I'm going to roundhouse kick you all over these message boards.

blah blah blah. didnt I say I stand corrected with the age thing buddy! And the reason I would go for Moulds is his size. Like I said we have to smaller recievers and need a bigger one. That is not to say I jump all over him because he is a FA. If I had to choose between the two, that is who I would take. And in todays NFL 6ft 180 to 190 is not concidered big, average, not big. Big is 6-2 to 6-4 220. Owens,burress,walker,clayton,curry,muhammed ect. You can disagree like a mature person or an idiot, seems to me you always take the idiot route. Like I said, what fact or research do you want me to do? what facts am I to check. I was a year off with the age. thats something to freak out about! You are truely annoying with your comments when someone has a different point of view. I dont attack people, or say they are incoherent, that is just f***ing stupid. grow up act like a mature adult and let people have their opinions or statements. You make this a totally un enjoyable site with all your bull shit remarks and "I'll roundhouse kick your ass all over this site" please!

SmootSmack · 03-10-2006, 11:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by #56fanatic

blah blah blah. didnt I say I stand corrected with the age thing buddy! And the reason I would go for Moulds is his size. Like I said we have to smaller recievers and need a bigger one. That is not to say I jump all over him because he is a FA. If I had to choose between the two, that is who I would take. And in todays NFL 6ft 180 to 190 is not concidered big, average, not big. Big is 6-2 to 6-4 220. Owens,burress,walker,clayton,curry,muhammed ect. You can disagree like a mature person or an idiot, seems to me you always take the idiot route. Like I said, what fact or research do you want me to do? what facts am I to check. I was a year off with the age. thats something to freak out about! You are truely annoying with your comments when someone has a different point of view. I dont attack people, or say they are incoherent, that is just f***ing stupid. grow up act like a mature adult and let people have their opinions or statements. You make this a totally un enjoyable site with all your bull shit remarks and "I'll roundhouse kick your ass all over this site" please!

Why do you think we need a big receiver?

#56fanatic · 03-10-2006, 11:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TAFKAS

Why do you think we need a big receiver?

Just my feeling. thats why. why do you think we dont? I like big targets, especially when we are inside the 20 or 10.

bjschmonsees · 03-09-2006, 02:47 PM

Rod Gardner is tall and available...

:vomit:

SmootSmack · 03-09-2006, 02:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bjschmonsees

Rod Gardner is tall and available...

:vomit:

so is Darnerien!

Sheriff Gonna Getcha · 03-09-2006, 03:48 PM

According to Lenny P., our first signing will likely be Adam Archuleta.

"Even the cap-strapped Washington Redskins had revved the engines to owner Dan Snyder's private jet, and were set to ferry in St. Louis strong safety Adam Archuleta for a first-day visit."

SmootSmack · 03-09-2006, 03:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ramseyfan

According to Lenny P., our first signing will likely be Adam Archuleta.

"Even the cap-strapped Washington Redskins had revved the engines to owner Dan Snyder's private jet, and were set to ferry in St. Louis strong safety Adam Archuleta for a first-day visit."

I still don't know how I feel about Archuleta. Really have mixed thoughts on him and I don't think he should necessarily be a priority.

Sheriff Gonna Getcha · 03-09-2006, 03:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TAFKAS

I still don't know how I feel about Archuleta. Really have mixed thoughts on him and I don't think he should necessarily be a priority.

While Sean Taylor and Ryan Clark are a more than adequate duo IMHO, I think I can understand why the team might be targeting Archuleta. First, Sean Taylor might wind up in prison. Second, Ryan Clark is a free agent. At first I thought signing Archuleta would be a luxury we can't afford. Now, I think it would make sense if his demands aren't outrageous.

Dirtbag59 · 03-09-2006, 04:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ramseyfan

According to Lenny P., our first signing will likely be Adam Archuleta.

"Even the cap-strapped Washington Redskins had revved the engines to owner Dan Snyder's private jet, and were set to ferry in St. Louis strong safety Adam Archuleta for a first-day visit."

I said David Givens. However the Redskins haven't been good at hiding there hand (in other words Jason Campbell last year). So I'm gonna go with the notion that Archulta will be the first signing.

Huddle · 03-09-2006, 04:16 PM

Red flag on Archuletta: 14 injuries in 5 seasons.

5 concussions
6 ankles
2 back
1 thumb

RedskinPete · 03-09-2006, 04:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Huddle

Red flag on Archuletta: 14 injuries in 5 seasons.

5 concussions
6 ankles
2 back
1 thumb

This is something that I think that needed to be said....I think we should stay away from him. Good post buddy!!!

70Chip · 03-09-2006, 05:51 PM

Bryan Finneran

mooby · 03-09-2006, 04:39 PM

i don't care how tall the wide receiver is, i just want productivity. but height is an added bonus when you're in the red zone.

Pocket$ $traight · 03-09-2006, 06:01 PM

I don't know about Finneran but Shaquille O'Neal wouldn't be able to get some of Vick's balls so maybe Finneran could be a sleeper.

View Poll Results: The Redskins' first acquisition (either through free agency or trade) will be...
WR Antwaan Randle El	23	15.65%
WR David Givens	12	8.16%
WR Isaac Bruce	31	21.09%
LB Julian Peterson	12	8.16%
LB Will Witherspoon	9	6.12%
DE John Abraham	17	11.56%
DE Darren Howard	9	6.12%
DE Trevor Pryce	3	2.04%
CB Ty Law	0	0%
CB Nate Clements	1	0.68%
S Adam Archuleta	17	11.56%
DT Rocky Bernard	1	0.68%
Other	12	8.16%
Voters: 147. You may not vote on this poll

03-09-2006, 03:48 PM	#7
Sheriff Gonna Getcha Franchise Player Join Date: Feb 2004 Age: 47 Posts: 8,317	Re: Predict our first major player acquisition According to Lenny P., our first signing will likely be Adam Archuleta. "Even the cap-strapped Washington Redskins had revved the engines to owner Dan Snyder's private jet, and were set to ferry in St. Louis strong safety Adam Archuleta for a first-day visit."

03-09-2006, 04:16 PM	#11
Huddle Special Teams Join Date: Nov 2005 Posts: 352	Re: Predict our first major player acquisition Red flag on Archuletta: 14 injuries in 5 seasons. 5 concussions 6 ankles 2 back 1 thumb

03-09-2006, 05:51 PM	#13
70Chip Playmaker Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Manassas Age: 55 Posts: 3,048	Re: Predict our first major player acquisition Bryan Finneran __________________ This Monkey's Gone to Heaven

03-09-2006, 04:39 PM	#14
mooby Hug Anne Spyder Join Date: Mar 2005 Posts: 20,596	Re: Predict our first major player acquisition i don't care how tall the wide receiver is, i just want productivity. but height is an added bonus when you're in the red zone. __________________ Hail to the Football Team

03-09-2006, 02:47 PM	#5
bjschmonsees Special Teams Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: Bethesda, MD Age: 55 Posts: 323	Re: Predict our first major player acquisition Rod Gardner is tall and available... :vomit:

03-09-2006, 06:01 PM	#15
Pocket$ $traight Registered User Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Fairfax, VA Age: 50 Posts: 4,261	Re: Predict our first major player acquisition I don't know about Finneran but Shaquille O'Neal wouldn't be able to get some of Vick's balls so maybe Finneran could be a sleeper.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Predict our first major player acquisition

Locker Room Main Forum