![]() |
|
|||||||
| Debating with the enemy Discuss politics, current events, and other hot button issues here. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: VA
Age: 43
Posts: 17,620
|
Re: Sequestration - good, bad, or indifferent?
and can we stop talking about cuts to future spending as if their the same thing as budget cuts?
our country is "making cuts" yet the debt and spending are still going up. that's stupid. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: chesapeake, va
Age: 62
Posts: 15,817
|
Re: Sequestration - good, bad, or indifferent?
Sr. the reduction in an increase is a cut if you listen to Washington. I used this same thinking when telling my wife I cut back on drinking.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: chesapeake, va
Age: 62
Posts: 15,817
|
Re: Sequestration - good, bad, or indifferent?
This why is why the federal goverment helps provide protection for the SB. From what I get they don't pay the entire bill and would guess that the city picks up a big chunk of the protection.
While the FBI Special Agent in Charge responsible for Super Bowl security, Michael Anderson, notes that “no specific or credible reporting of any threats” has been made regarding the Super Bowl, serious efforts are still being expended. This is demonstrated by the fact that the Super Bowl has been designated as a “Level I” national security event by the Department of Homeland Security. This designation is notable, as it signifies that the Department of Homeland Security has determined that the Super Bowl is a type of event most likely to be targeted by terrorists. The designation as a Level I national security event is also notable for budgetary reasons. Once an event is assigned this designation, the federal government in a sense overtakes security plans for the event. This in turn means that federal dollars are spent providing security for the Super Bowl. While the NFL would not provide an exact number for what has been spent on Super Bowl security, what is known is that a portion of the Department of Homeland Security’s $43.2 billion 2012 budget was spent on the event. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Aug 2008
Age: 58
Posts: 21,742
|
Quote:
its weird that I can agree with slashing defense yet disagree about how. I do agree about bringing nearly all troops back, and putting leading tech projects on hold, but I would absolutely maintain airforce and navy forces and train for defense of vital airways and sealanes. I also find your increasing NASA interesting. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 3,754
|
Re: Sequestration - good, bad, or indifferent?
There's plenty of money that could be shifted from military to NASA (military and non-military uses).
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Richmond
Posts: 3,261
|
Re: Sequestration - good, bad, or indifferent?
Right before the sequester happend i heard a guy on a the radio say something really funny. He said, if your family needs to cut a few percent from their budget you would cut out dinning, or a cable package, or even a cell phone plan. Obama on the other hand is selling this as you should stop feeding the baby and putting gas in your car.
Meanwhile, since things arnt going nearly as bad as Obama had scared us into believing they would: Email tells feds to make sequester as painful as promised - Washington Times GOP Congressman Makes CDC Director Squirm After Confronting Him on Children’s Vaccine Cuts: ‘Let Me Get This Straight…’ | Video | TheBlaze.com Quote:
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 3,754
|
Re: Sequestration - good, bad, or indifferent?
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: chesapeake, va
Age: 62
Posts: 15,817
|
Re: Sequestration - good, bad, or indifferent?
Quote:
This President will do anything to get his way even if it means running this country into the ground. The Dems are also playing the race card. Democrats pull out race card in sequester game - Washington Times Last edited by firstdown; 03-08-2013 at 12:32 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Gamebreaker
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 14,587
|
Re: Sequestration - good, bad, or indifferent?
Quote:
The Washington Times,really?
__________________
....DISCLAIMER: All of my posts/threads are my expressed typed opinion and the reader is not to assume these comments are absolute fact, law, or truth unless otherwise stated in said post/thread. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: chesapeake, va
Age: 62
Posts: 15,817
|
Re: Sequestration - good, bad, or indifferent?
I probably just made a big mistake telling the lady at the IRS that I hope her job is done away with because of Sequestraqtion. I could tell from the minute she answered the phone after I held fo 15 min she had that attitude thing going. I got hit with a $329.60 penalty for paying my taxes one day late (talk about excessive). They were actually paid on the due date but was processed the following day. She shrugged it off as no big deal, would not answer my question about it being excessive, and then when I ask she said "what do you want me to do about it". Thats when I got pissed but I probably should have waited until I protested the fine.
Last edited by firstdown; 03-11-2013 at 12:04 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Richmond
Posts: 3,261
|
Re: Sequestration - good, bad, or indifferent?
Whats really sad is that the economic policies of Democrat seem to have the largest impact of negitively affecting the majority of minorities.
Here is a great documentry about the Democratic Plantation: Runaway Slave - DVD Available Now Runaway Slave Movie - Own it on DVD! - YouTube
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Richmond
Posts: 3,261
|
Re: Sequestration - good, bad, or indifferent?
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Parkton, MD
Posts: 5,888
|
Re: Sequestration - good, bad, or indifferent?
For your first question I would guess it is to provide gasoline, petrochemicals and plastics affordable to everyone. The law for leasing mining and drilling rights on public land dates back to the 1890s and was never adjusted until the 1990s. I too would guess that it is to keep oil competitive. In 2006 it costs $2 to produce a barrel of oil in Saudi Arabia and it cost between $30 and $45 in Canada/Alaska. Regardless with prices at $90 per a barrel someone is making a huge profit, but not subsidizing it would make it less profitable and costs American jobs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Aug 2008
Age: 58
Posts: 21,742
|
Re: Sequestration - good, bad, or indifferent?
ABC7News @ABC7News
The Department of Housing and Urban Development will furlough all 9,000 employees for 7 days between May, August. Sequestration 2013: HUD to furlough all 9,000 employees for seven days | WJLA.com Retweeted by Yahoo! News I hate it for the individual employees, but if you are in favor of reducing govt (which I am), these stories will be more prevalent. |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,807
|
Re: Sequestration - good, bad, or indifferent?
Quote:
__________________
"It's not about what you've done, but what's been done for you." |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|