![]() |
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Culver City, CA
Posts: 1,013
|
Re: Bucs Postgame Thread
Anyone showing up with bags over their heads yet? I think that's how you measure who's really at the bottom of the barrel in this league
__________________
RIP 21 |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Holland, Michigan
Posts: 5,741
|
Re: Bucs Postgame Thread
__________________
REDSKINS FAN SINCE 1968 |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Special Teams
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 106
|
Re: Bucs Postgame Thread
Quote:
Cousins though would have thrown like 3 more interceptions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Special Teams
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Dublin, Ohio
Posts: 328
|
Re: Bucs Postgame Thread
While there has been a lot of deserved dumping on RG3, the fact is we have the worst line in the NFL. 3 of the 5 do not even belong in the NFL. I can understand a bit why RG3 is jumpy. He usually has only about 2 second before some guy from the other team is ready to kill him. Ok, possibly Moses could develop into a RT. But the guards are the worst in the league. The only function Polumbus used to serve was to distract people from how bad Chester is. At a minimum, we need to NFL caliber guards for next year.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 1,066
|
Re: Bucs Postgame Thread
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: Bucs Postgame Thread
Quote:
Also, is it actually a fact that we have the worst OL and that Griffin has less time than other QBs to throw the ball?
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Fire Bruce NOW
![]() Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Hattiesburg, MS
Posts: 11,434
|
Re: Bucs Postgame Thread
IMO RGIII makes the line look way worse than it is.
__________________
Bruce Allen when in charge alone: 4-12 (.250) Bruce Allen's overall Redskins record : 28-52 (.350) Vinny Cerrato's record when in charge alone: 52-65 (.444) Vinny's overall Redskins record: 62-82 (.430) We won more with Vinny |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Davidsonville
Posts: 1,783
|
Re: Bucs Postgame Thread
That's actually the prevailing opinion by anyone who knows wtf they're talking about, including the current and former head coaches of the Redskins. It's stupid to say no QB could play well behind the Redskins O-line. In actuality, no O-line could play well in front of RG3. 15 sacks in 3 games vs. 13 sacks over 7 games for KC and Colt (and they're not even that good).
__________________
I am a system poster. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Jacksonville, Forida
Posts: 6,412
|
Re: Bucs Postgame Thread
I agree and I think that Colt's play against Dallas illustrated that. I consider what you say to be closer to fact than opinion. I'm not saying this is to bash RGIII but there's no sense in denying what our eyes have clearly seen.
__________________
I'm a big Caitlin Clark fan! |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 1,066
|
Re: Bucs Postgame Thread
Quote:
And I will say this for the 20th time this week. We are not talking about an established QB here. We are talking about one that is in the development stage. These QB's that everyone wants to compare to are not available. We wont get them, so our only choice is to develop one. Rodgers and Brady can have some success on our team, but they are already developed. Knowing that is our only choice, and frankly has been for a long time now (Payton wasnt coming here so dont say we missed out on him when we decided to draft RG3. Payton wanted nothing to do with the same division his brother plays in). Since that is our choice, we need to do things that help in a QB's development. Young QB's rarely develop with a bad OL. The fact is one QB can be quite good if he has good development and be terrible if he was developed completely wrong. And no one will know whether they could have succeeded if it was done properly... No one. We are setting ourselves up to draft Jameis Winston (RG3 v2) or Marcus Mariotta (RG3 v2.1) and just ruin them as well. Then in 3 or 4 more years, I will still have to deal with you saying the OL excuse is tired, have to deal with Punch claiming to be the Psychologist Psychic and claim that he knows if someone has it inside of them, and half of everyone else on this board wondering why a young QB cant succeed behind this line since Aaron Rodgers or Tom Brady probably could. There is no improvement there. And without that, its futile. I would rather tank for 5 straight years than go through 20 more years of this same crap we have been watching. I wish people would stop complaining about the team then say the team should not change course (except fire the coach) from what they have already proven to be a failure for two decades. Young QB's that are constantly under pressure tend to start forgetting about footwork, staring receivers down, hurrying throws and throwing int's. Once the int's come, they start holding the ball longer. They get ancy feet and dance in the pocket. They start patting the ball like a hot potato because they really dont want it. If they get rushed up the middle with any kind of frequency, they completely abandon trying to climb the pocket and immediately try to head to the sideline. It also does not take that rush to be every play, so yes, there are times when the middle of the line is held up and the QB has the opportunity to climb the pocket but still heads outside the pocket instead. Look at Dallas, what has changed for them? Do you think DeMarco Murray all of a sudden became some great back? No... Hes the same guy he always has been. But trying to run when their is no hole and trying to run when there is a hole that you could drive a mack truck through is a huge difference. Their offense is putting up long drives and keeping other teams offense on the sideline (as well as making them one dimensional) and masking their defense. The only thing they have changed... The OL. The saddest thing about all of this... This is all football 101. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Holland, Michigan
Posts: 5,741
|
Re: Bucs Postgame Thread
I see nothing to make me assume otherwise.
__________________
REDSKINS FAN SINCE 1968 |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Woodside, CA
Age: 58
Posts: 4,016
|
Re: Bucs Postgame Thread
Quote:
Agreed on all counts; Kory and Trent are NFL caliber, with Trent being the only one pretty much a guaranteed starter on most teams. The other matadors have no business protecting anyone.
__________________
"Coach, what do you think of your team's execution?" "I'm all for it." -- Coach McKay |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: close to the edge
Posts: 4,926
|
Re: Bucs Postgame Thread
Quote:
he has week in, week out been saying the TEs do not help on chips or blocks. reed is pretty much no-existent in blocking and they dont even ask him to do that = less snaps. says paulsen hasnt been great and should be better. except for RT, the O line isnt that bad imo. you can win with this O line. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 22,379
|
Re: Bucs Postgame Thread
And to think that Jerry Jones wanted to draft Johnny Manziel in the first round. Instead, his people convinced him to draft a guard.
__________________
R.I.P. #21 |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Apr 2005
Age: 51
Posts: 1,961
|
Re: Bucs Postgame Thread
Percentage of pass attempts that end in sacks:
RG3 2014: 13.0% 2013: 7.7% Kirk 2014: 3.8% 2013: 3.1% (As per pro-football-reference.com) Apparently the O-line is worse when Griffin plays.
__________________
This is my signature, there are many like it, but this one is mine. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|