Warpath's Official Man Law Thread

[BigSKINBauer]

Originally Posted by mheisig

Bros Before Hoes Escape Clause: When in the course of preparing for or attending a preplanned "bro event," should a bro be given the opportunity to bag a chick of extraordinarily unusual hotness, bro is released from all former bro obligations, plans, events and promises. "Extraordinarily Unusual Hotness" is defined as hotness on par with Jessica Alba, Scarlett Johansen or Mandi Moore. The bro in question must abide by the previously established Man Law that all Extraordinarily Hot Chicks must be established with photographic/video evidence. Bro is allowed to enact the "Bros Before Hoes" escape clause if, and only if, aforementioned Bros concur via majority vote that "Hoe" in question is in fact extraordinarily and unusually hot.

Can we all get on board with this?

I like the vote without it the clause would be trash. I believe the bros before hoes rule is more applicable for girlfriends and less for random girls. This clause should not be applicable for any girl that has an extended relationship with the man, lets say 6 weeks. I don't care how hot my friend's girlfriend is he can't enact this clause for her all the time. This clause is perfect for random girls. If a group of guys are out at a party but have plans for later antd one meets someone a vote must be taken and it will not reflect badly on the man left behind.

[mheisig]

Sorry, but if my regular girlfriend were Jessica Alba or Scarlett Johansen, I'd tell the bros to F off. Then I'd buy new friends with the money from my incredibly hot and rich girlfriend.

[BigSKINBauer]

Originally Posted by mheisig

Sorry, but if my regular girlfriend were Jessica Alba or Scarlett Johansen, I'd tell the bros to F off. Then I'd buy new friends with the money from my incredibly hot and rich girlfriend.

This debate is worth it for its significance and I am sure we will come out with a law worthy of man law.

I know you were joking but we must make this perfect. See if my friend was going out with Jessica alba it would be OK for a couple weeks. After that she is his girlfriend and that is what bros before hoes was made for. HE can't break plans with us over and over regardless if we vote she is extraordinarly hot. We won't change our minds about that so he can't just get out everytime. It must have significance. Lets say it is past the first two weeks and she is his girl, I would not mind as much if he is just about to seal the deal. I would rather use this clause in that situation than during the first two weeks because this situtation holds more significance. Bros before hoes is for all those that lose friends because they only want to do shit with their girls and that doesn't fly. And like the article said, when jessica alba dumps his sorry ass he is left with no one. He has betrayed his friends for months and has no girl. This law protects the original bro as much as his bros. Girls come and go but friends are there for the long haul.

[ArtMonkDrillz]

Originally Posted by BigSKINBauer

I like the vote without it the clause would be trash. I believe the bros before hoes rule is more applicable for girlfriends and less for random girls. This clause should not be applicable for any girl that has an extended relationship with the man, lets say 6 weeks. I don't care how hot my friend's girlfriend is he can't enact this clause for her all the time. This clause is perfect for random girls. If a group of guys are out at a party but have plans for later antd one meets someone a vote must be taken and it will not reflect badly on the man left behind.

Exactly, this is for random girls and it must be used sparingly. One of my friends became famous for this; he would get with these who we all though were the total package back in high school and ditch a planned bro event. "No big deal, at least he's with her" we'd say, until 3 months (and half of the Skins tickets he promised me) were behind us we would all mock him and be about ready to kill him for breaking the Bros before Hoes code.

And on that note, a BLT awaits...

[ArtMonkDrillz]

Good points by both of you, maybe I rushed that one. Jessica Alba (once in a life time for a goober like me) vs the sideline (I could always jump the wall and run like hell for a few seconds). Ummmm, the law is tough.

[BigSKINBauer]

I found this over here http://dpvball.tripod.com/scottsong/...efore_hoes.htm

Perhaps we can take and learn and take parts from it.

throughout my life, i have seen numerous guy friends get whooped.
whooped by some girl who isn't going to mean much to him in the long run.
but during that short period of time when the relationship is rolling, the
guy tends to forget about his other responsibilities. this is where i
come in to set everything straight.

bros before hoes. that's the one and only rule. well, don't
cheat on the gal...i guess that's another rule. but anyways, i'm not
saying that all girls are hoes or anything, so ladies, don't get offended.
it's just a generalized term used to describe all the women out there who
mess with a guy and take him away from his friends.

a lot of times, it's necessary to take a step back and look at the
big picture. if all your life you grew up with a group of guys, then you
must place them higher than any short term girlfriend. it makes sense b/c
the longer you know someone, the more you should trust them and the more
they should mean to you. the problem with guys is that we always think
with our hormones and not our heads, so when you meet this girl, you are
willing to drop everything for her b/c you think she is perfect. (which
goes back to my other point in the other plan that guys tend to think they
know the girl well when they really don't). so they drop everything for
this girl and he loses all contact with his other friends...but after the
relationship ends, he finds himself with no friends to turn to, since he
betrayed them all. hahaha. who you gonna turn to now, boy??? IDIOT!

but there is also a lot of misconception as to when or how a guy
disses his boy by choosing the girl over his boys. scenario: you promise
the girl you'd have lunch with her and then later the guys ask if you want
to join THEM for lunch. you say no b/c you're supposed to eat with your
girl. are you a diss? NO, you're just trying to be a man of your word.
guys who consider that to be a diss are a bunch of morons.
but if the girl messes with your previously arranged plans with
your guy friends, then there's a prob. or when all you ever talk about
with your guy friends is your girlfriend, then there is also another prob.
or when the guy is willing to do much bigger favors for the girl than for
his boys, then there is a HUGE problem. i know guys who'd drive the girl
practically anywhere but would have a fit if you asked him for a ride
home. bitter? nah...it just makes decisions about how much you wanna
invest in the friendship a lot more easier. actually, to be honest, i haven't
been dissed a lot by guy friends...but that's only b/c my friends and i are all
losers who can't get any girls anyways. But you can still be a diss even if
you never have a girl...lots of guys drop their friends in PURSUIT of a
girl...and they end up empty handed. haha.

the true character of a guy is revealed by how he treats his guy
friends. anyone can be sweet to a girl that he likes, but it takes a lot
more character to be generous and understanding to another guy. why?
because close guy friends have nothing to offer unless you're a
flaming homosexual with overpowering strength (tom kim) and also b/c since
the guys are so close, you can observe how he acts around those who he
feels comfortable around. so if he treats his close friends like crap,
then be ready to expect the same from him later down the line when he
feels comfortable around you. that's why i hate guys who are nice to
girls and only girls. girls justify it by saying "well, you just gotta
get to KNOW him and his sensitive side...he's just misunderstood..." i
say that it's a bunch of BS. a jerk is a jerk is a jerk. they just show no
character or class.

girls tend not to ever realize that they are taking their "man"
away from his guy friends. so girls, try to be more aware of everything.
understand that a guy needs his guy friends, just as a girl needs her girl
friends. be understanding if he needs to sacrifice time with you to be
with the friends he grew up with. a hoe ain't gonna understand and will
demand that the guy give her all of his attention 24/7. a real woman is
secure enough in the relationship to loosen that leash a little so that he
can live a halfway normal life.

guys, don't lose sight of what's important. don't put all your
eggs in one basket, cuz if it falls, then not only do you lose all your
eggs, but you feel like a loser for dropping the basket, too. but if you
want the girl to understand your need to be with your boys, then make sure
you can make her secure in the relationship, otherwise you aren't doing
your job as a man. don't be with the guys and neglect the girl, either.
but all in all, girls come and go, but friends...well, friends come and
go, too. but it just looks better to drop a hoe than to drop your
friends. remember, she may be sweet, she may be wonderful, but if she
tries to take you away from what made you YOU, then she ain't nuthin' but
a HOE. =)

[ArtMonkDrillz]

I'm stuck on the first sentence, does he mean whipped? Nevermind, I'll keep reading

[BigSKINBauer]

why is the BSB so adament about this? I will tell you why... here we go. I haven't said anything to him about this but I am sure he will read this. Now you all know of beach week, an event at the conclusion of high school where the seniors go to the beach. Some of you may know that I did not go.

A member here at the warpath, vishsskins was supposed to go with me for atleast 1-2 nights and we had a lot of people up there that would let us in their rooms. I have the go ahead from vishsskins that we are going. I knew a girl and mutual friend to us both had some sort of important event for herself. She sings and she wanted him to watch but he told me he would go with me. Well he calls me 10:30 the night before we go and says, yeah I don't WANT TO GO. Its not that he couldn't go, its that he didn't want to go. I was pissed and he knew it. I ddin't want to make the 3 hour trip myself and decided I am not going to be going either. Someone else was going but said earlier that he wasn't going to go for legit reasons.

Vishsskins tells me its not that he wants to do anything else its that he just doesn't want to go. Well he goes to this thing for that girl 3 days later they are going out. He played me like a fiddle. He dropped our plans to go get this girl. This wasn't poker or a movie. This was beach week. Ultimate betrayal. Atleast tell me why and maybe I can enact the clause but to lie and betray? I have now made myself mad. That is cold.

[ArtMonkDrillz]

Originally Posted by BigSKINBauer

why is the BSB so adament about this? I will tell you why... here we go. I haven't said anything to him about this but I am sure he will read this. Now you all know of beach week, an event at the conclusion of high school where the seniors go to the beach. Some of you may know that I did not go.

A member here at the warpath, vishsskins was supposed to go with me for atleast 1-2 nights and we had a lot of people up there that would let us in their rooms. I have the go ahead from vishsskins that we are going. I knew a girl and mutual friend to us both had some sort of important event for herself. She sings and she wanted him to watch but he told me he would go with me. Well he calls me 10:30 the night before we go and says, yeah I don't WANT TO GO. Its not that he couldn't go, its that he didn't want to go. I was pissed and he knew it. I ddin't want to make the 3 hour trip myself and decided I am not going to be going either. Someone else was going but said earlier that he wasn't going to go for legit reasons.

Vishsskins tells me its not that he wants to do anything else its that he just doesn't want to go. Well he goes to this thing for that girl 3 days later they are going out. He played me like a fiddle. He dropped our plans to go get this girl. This wasn't poker or a movie. This was beach week. Ultimate betrayal. Atleast tell me why and maybe I can enact the clause but to lie and betray? I have now made myself mad. That is cold.

Man Law: Vishsskins f'd up and unless he has Skins season tickets and takes you to as many games as you want to go to (that's what my 'friend' did), he can't not make up for it!

[gibbsisgod]

Originally Posted by BigSKINBauer

why is the BSB so adament about this? I will tell you why... here we go. I haven't said anything to him about this but I am sure he will read this. Now you all know of beach week, an event at the conclusion of high school where the seniors go to the beach. Some of you may know that I did not go.

A member here at the warpath, vishsskins was supposed to go with me for atleast 1-2 nights and we had a lot of people up there that would let us in their rooms. I have the go ahead from vishsskins that we are going. I knew a girl and mutual friend to us both had some sort of important event for herself. She sings and she wanted him to watch but he told me he would go with me. Well he calls me 10:30 the night before we go and says, yeah I don't WANT TO GO. Its not that he couldn't go, its that he didn't want to go. I was pissed and he knew it. I ddin't want to make the 3 hour trip myself and decided I am not going to be going either. Someone else was going but said earlier that he wasn't going to go for legit reasons.

Vishsskins tells me its not that he wants to do anything else its that he just doesn't want to go. Well he goes to this thing for that girl 3 days later they are going out. He played me like a fiddle. He dropped our plans to go get this girl. This wasn't poker or a movie. This was beach week. Ultimate betrayal. Atleast tell me why and maybe I can enact the clause but to lie and betray? I have now made myself mad. That is cold.

thebsb got hosed. this is unacceptable.

[gibbsisgod]

i dont think its neccesary, but did the bsb explain about all the poon there is to be had during beach week?

[BigSKINBauer]

Originally Posted by gibbsisgod

i dont think its neccesary, but did the bsb explain about all the poon there is to be had during beach week?

I reason that it might just be a taste of what college is. Still

[gibbsisgod]

that definetly deserves a snubbing the next time you come in contact with this guy

[gibbsisgod]

in all fairness to vishskins, his side of the story should be told. thebsb's side is pretty convincing but there are 2 sides to every story!

[BigSKINBauer]

Originally Posted by gibbsisgod

in all fairness to vishskins, his side of the story should be told. thebsb's side is pretty convincing but there are 2 sides to every story!

well i just had a conversation with him. I never brought this up. I have been doing things with him for the past two weeks and I never said "the reason you didn't go was for her". I just said it and I expected him to defend himself. He goes, "Yeah, sounds about right". I was stunned I expected some sort of defense. I said so you didn't go with me to go to her thing. He said that he would rather go to her thing than beach week but if she didn't have that thing it would only increase the chances of him going to beach week. I said to him, you broke man law, defend yourself, lie, do something! He asked about man law and I explained bros before hoes. This was all a light hearted conversation. I told him he betrayed me only to increase his standing with her, at which point he replied, "Lets just say, I didn't need to increase my standing, lets just leave it at that" like a pimp.

The confident son of a bitch broke man law and must be subject to persecution.