Per Vinny Cerrato, JC is our QB this season!

[T.O.Killa]

I hope Vinny is lying again

[53Fan]

I think JC is going to do just fine this year. I also think Colt is going to be better than a lot of people here think he is. If, IF, Campbell does not have the kind of year he's expected to have in the second year of this offense, then I would like to see Colt given a shot next year, 2010. If JC does continue to get better and Colt does too, that only makes us that much better. To bring another QB in right now would do more harm than good IMO.

[70Chip]

Did anyone see Mr. Belding on Jimmy Fallon earlier tonight? It's a Dennis Haskins Renaissance.

[Pocket$ $traight]

Who cares who the QB is? It won't matter unless there is improvement on the offensive line and they find some depth for the injuries that are definitely coming.

Also, if James Thrash is a starting receiver this year we will be lucky to be 7-9.

[Ruhskins]

Originally Posted by Pocket$ $traight

Who cares who the QB is? It won't matter unless there is improvement on the offensive line and they find some depth for the injuries that are definitely coming.

Also, if James Thrash is a starting receiver this year we will be lucky to be 7-9.

I'm sure Minnesota and any other teams with mediocre QBs thought the same thing.

Anyway, interesting tidbit from ESPN Rumors:

Titans to get in the mix for Cutler?
Jay Cutler | Broncos | Interested: Titans?
With the rumor mill drumming up a Jay Cutler-to-the-Washington Redskins trade yesterday, Redskins executive vice president of football operations Vinny Cerrato felt the need to squash that report, telling the Washington Times, "Jason [Campbell] is our quarterback."

While that takes another team off the list of potential destinations for Cutler, the Tennessee Titans have stuck around in the conversation, and David Climer of the Nashville Tennessean thinks trading for Cutler would be a great move for the team. Other folks have pointed to Cutler's background in Tennessee, from when he starred at Vanderbilt, as well as his past relationship with Titans offensive coordinator Mike Heimerdinger, from when both were with the Denver Broncos.

This action would be somewhat against the grain, as the Titans tend to stockpile draft picks instead of trade them, and a deal for Cutler likely would involve one or more picks going to the Broncos along with Kerry Collins. Collins was promised he would be the starter in 2009 before he signed a new deal with Tennessee, so the team certainly would need to move him if it brought in another player to start. In fact, Collins told Paul Kuharsky of ESPN.com recently that, "They've made it pretty clear what my role is here and I don't expect that to change any time soon."

While a trade might be unlikely for these reasons, it also would be a version of do-over, as the Titans passed on Cutler in the 2006 draft with the third overall pick, opting to instead go with Vince Young.

[Paintrain]

More interesting rumors.. Cutler to Redskins in three-way deal? Cassel to Denver? - Sports Rumors - NFL - Yahoo! Sports

Cutler to Redksins, Cassell to Broncos, Campbell to Chiefs. Discuss.

[SC Skins Fan]

Originally Posted by Paintrain

More interesting rumors.. Cutler to Redskins in three-way deal? Cassel to Denver? - Sports Rumors - NFL - Yahoo! Sports

Cutler to Redksins, Cassell to Broncos, Campbell to Chiefs. Discuss.

Let's get this straight. Because the Redskins deny an interest in trading Campbell and because no reputable reporter has found evidence of a trade, that is evidence that a trade is imminent. This is the type of hard hitting reporting that I am going to miss once newspapers like the Philadelphia Inquirer disappear. (Not to mention the fact that the trade makes no sense for the Chiefs).

[MTK]

Originally Posted by SC Skins Fan

Let's get this straight. Because the Redskins deny an interest in trading Campbell and because no reputable reporter has found evidence of a trade, that is evidence that a trade is imminent. This is the type of hard hitting reporting that I am going to miss once newspapers like the Philadelphia Inquirer disappear.

Seriously, this shit just needs to stop.

[MTK]

ugh I wish these rumors would just die already

[skinsfan_nn]

Who knows..? This could heat up and get interesting.

[Ruhskins]

I feel bad for Campbell, hearing all these crazy rumors. Kudos to him for not acting like many other players would and complain.

Honestly, unless a credible source like ESPN, CBS Sports, SI, or NFL Network people should not be paying attention to this.

[KLHJ2]

I wish Draft day would just come and make the madness cease. No source has said anything more than pure speculation.

Let me tell you a little story. Two seasons ago one at the end of a preseason game some local media guy got on TV and confirmed that an inside source said that the Skins were going to trade Brunell to Seattle. Long story short, it never happened. Don't believe crap until the Redskins or Adam Schefter officially announces it.

Moderate speculation is ok, but don't too caught up in it.

[redsk1]

There are a lot of crazy rumors, but where there is smoke there is fire generally. So, I wouldn't be shocked if our FO approached the subject. It's not going to happen though.

Let's get this much clear though. Please don't believe anything VC sais...ever. Whatever comes out of his mouth means nothing to me.

[firstdown]

Originally Posted by redsk1

There are a lot of crazy rumors, but where there is smoke there is fire generally. So, I wouldn't be shocked if our FO approached the subject. It's not going to happen though.

Let's get this much clear though. Please don't believe anything VC sais...ever. Whatever comes out of his mouth means nothing to me.

What are you saying? That VC never tells the truth (lies) or he keeps stuff hush, hush until the deal is done?

[redsk1]

Originally Posted by firstdown

What are you saying? That VC never tells the truth (lies) or he keeps stuff hush, hush until the deal is done?

No, i would never want a GM or FO executive to show his hand. It's like in baseball, most GM's have a way of shadowing what they are doing w/ out coming out and saying we're not doing this or that. They do it in a way that's smooth. Does that make sense? VC isn't too smooth? Am i off base here?

It's not that big of a deal...i was just trying to point out that i don't put any emhasis on what VC says. Why would you?