|
Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
09-13-2010, 05:33 PM | #106 |
\m/
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,518
|
Re: (Vent thread) I'm sorry,but the notion,that the Redskins have "no" receivers is just stupid!
I'm going to guess that the gameplan was a bit scaled down for McNabb last night and that's probably why he didn't spread it around. As he gets more comfortable I think he will get more guys involved.
|
Advertisements |
09-13-2010, 05:35 PM | #107 | |
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: PA
Age: 45
Posts: 17,460
|
Re: (Vent thread) I'm sorry,but the notion,that the Redskins have "no" receivers is just stupid!
Quote:
Sundberg could have yelled something similar.
__________________
Not sent from a Droid, iPhone, Blackberry or toaster |
|
09-13-2010, 05:42 PM | #108 |
Living Legend
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: chesapeake, va
Age: 60
Posts: 15,817
|
Re: (Vent thread) I'm sorry,but the notion,that the Redskins have "no" receivers is just stupid!
I did not realize how well that ball was thrown until I just saw the pic in the above link. I hope it was just his nerves and this is not the start of any trend.
|
09-13-2010, 05:54 PM | #109 |
\m/
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,518
|
Re: (Vent thread) I'm sorry,but the notion,that the Redskins have "no" receivers is just stupid!
The first fade to Armstrong was right on the money, he just flat out dropped it. The 2nd was better defended, but the pass was still right there.
|
09-13-2010, 05:56 PM | #110 |
Naega jeil jal naga
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlanta, Georgia From: Silver Spring, Maryland
Age: 39
Posts: 14,750
|
Re: (Vent thread) I'm sorry,but the notion,that the Redskins have "no" receivers is just stupid!
We should put in Thomas if for nothing more then the fact that he's among the better blockers playing receiver.
__________________
"It's nice to be important, but its more important to be nice." - Scooter "I feel like Dirtbag has been slowly and methodically trolling the board for a month or so now." - FRPLG |
09-13-2010, 05:57 PM | #111 |
The Starter
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Norfolk, Va (OV)
Posts: 1,566
|
Re: (Vent thread) I'm sorry,but the notion,that the Redskins have "no" receivers is just stupid!
Prediction: Thomas will play ahead of Armstrong against HOU.
__________________
'Any NFL team will win with RG3. Imagine how exciting it will be watching him do it.' |
09-13-2010, 06:07 PM | #112 |
Hug Anne Spyder
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 20,468
|
Re: (Vent thread) I'm sorry,but the notion,that the Redskins have "no" receivers is just stupid!
You know who I really didn't see much of last night? Fred Davis.
|
09-13-2010, 06:11 PM | #113 |
Naega jeil jal naga
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlanta, Georgia From: Silver Spring, Maryland
Age: 39
Posts: 14,750
|
Re: (Vent thread) I'm sorry,but the notion,that the Redskins have "no" receivers is just stupid!
I don't know. I think that Armstrong will still be ahead of Thomas. In spite of last nights miscue the guy is still closer to breaking out.
I pray you're right.
__________________
"It's nice to be important, but its more important to be nice." - Scooter "I feel like Dirtbag has been slowly and methodically trolling the board for a month or so now." - FRPLG |
09-13-2010, 06:15 PM | #114 |
Special Teams
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Oneida N.Y
Posts: 138
|
Re: (Vent thread) I'm sorry,but the notion,that the Redskins have "no" receivers is just stupid!
Joey Galloway will be benched and or cut by week 4. How he is staring is crazy.
|
09-13-2010, 06:43 PM | #115 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Germantown, Md.
Posts: 4,832
|
Re: (Vent thread) I'm sorry,but the notion,that the Redskins have "no" receivers is just stupid!
He got in briefly on a couple of plays, got a penalty for holding and I didn't see much of him after that.
__________________
A revolution is coming and it will be televised. |
09-13-2010, 10:35 PM | #116 |
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Boone, NC
Posts: 579
|
Re: (Vent thread) I'm sorry,but the notion,that the Redskins have "no" receivers is just stupid!
So, did Bruce Allen call A.J. Smith today?
|
09-13-2010, 10:44 PM | #117 |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Detroit area
Posts: 4,153
|
Re: (Vent thread) I'm sorry,but the notion,that the Redskins have "no" receivers is just stupid!
Not sure about Armstrong more close in breaking out than DT. I know it is one game, but so far, he doesn't look like he is going anywhere. I am thinking WR will be a top priority in the draft or the next FA signing period, or both. I love our TE's but you can't always target them.
|
09-14-2010, 01:03 AM | #118 |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Jacksonville, Forida
Posts: 6,398
|
Re: (Vent thread) I'm sorry,but the notion,that the Redskins have "no" receivers is just stupid!
|
09-14-2010, 01:26 AM | #119 | |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 5,662
|
Re: (Vent thread) I'm sorry,but the notion,that the Redskins have "no" receivers is just stupid!
Quote:
I agree w/ those who think Thomas should get his reps out there. He's still got the most potential of any WR on the roster. Maybe the Shanny's are working him in easy, which would make sense considering it's the elephant in the room (how much pressure/expectation there is for him).
__________________
24-34 |
|
09-14-2010, 09:25 AM | #120 |
Camp Scrub
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 53
|
Re: (Vent thread) I'm sorry,but the notion,that the Redskins have "no" receivers is just stupid!
The main thing Mcnabb did on Snday night that impressed me was keeping drives alive and not turning the ball over. I'm sure the TD's will come as we move forward in the season.
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|