![]() |
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: To Read Option, or Not
The student has surpassed the teacher. Wise words my friend. Wise words
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 5,662
|
Re: To Read Option, or Not
Quote:
What amazes me, is after a season of horrific injuries (to RG) folks are still homers for the status quo. It just seems like common sense to limit the number of hits to this guy who we mortgaged the future on. I mean, answer me this: is it your opinion we cannot compete with a traditional offense? Why else would you risk your QB?
__________________
24-34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: To Read Option, or Not
Quote:
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 5,662
|
Re: To Read Option, or Not
LOL. I can agree to disagree.
Context is also important here. You don't hear many positive comments about us (Shanny especially) outside Skins fandom, which for me is basically just this board. Last night is a good example. Watched the draft with a houseful of football buddies plus wives and girlfriends. Cowboys fans. Steelers. Saints. Seahawks. Broncos. The few times a convo turned toward the Skins there was a single theme: "What the eff are the Redskins/Shanahans thinking?" About the read-option. About keeping RG on the field after the Baltimore injury, and most especially in the playoff game. Literally, every person at the house, and every football fan I've ever chatted with outside this board, thought keeping RG in that game was/is the most appalling decision/behavior they've seen by a coach anywhere (pro, college, other sports). I'd like to think my views are pretty reasonable, given I listen to a lot of different perspectives and avoid a "bubble" experience. I guess my bottom line: if we continue to use RG as a running QB the likelihood he plays a long, healthy career isn't good.
__________________
24-34 |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: PA
Age: 47
Posts: 17,460
|
Re: To Read Option, or Not
Quote:
He's not a running QB, Vick was a running QB. Unlike Vick, Griffin is also one of the most accurate passers in the NFL and can beat teams on the ground and in the air. He's not a running QB, he's a QB who can run. It's more than semantics. There's a huge difference. If Conan did his "If they mated" bit with Chris Johnson and Peyton Manning, RGIII would be the answer. The way Robert led the offense to a winning TD all by himself in just his fourth game in the NFL after they turned off his headset...that's leadership and poise like Manning, but with world class speed.
__________________
Not sent from a Droid, iPhone, Blackberry or toaster |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Age: 55
Posts: 5,006
|
Re: To Read Option, or Not
Quote:
1. vs. Atlanta 2. vs. Baltimore 3. vs. Seattle (2nd TD drive) 4. vs. Seattle (end of the game) Since you watched every play of every game last year, can you tell us what each play was and how Griffin got hurt? To your team building strategy of building a formidable line, neither Shanahan will ever have a traditional drop back passing game that a 'formidable line' suits. They have, with the exception of a needed upgrade at RT, a good line for the offense. The running game will continue to be the engine and this year, expect to see RGIII in more of the style that Cousins played in vs. Cleveland and what the offense was prior to last season. The QB who you keep describing isn't RGIII, it's Michael Vick..
__________________
Paintrain's Redskins Fandom 1981-2014 I'm not dead but this team is dead to me...but now that McCloughan is here they may have new life! Jay Gruden = Zorny McSpurrier Kirk Cousins = Next Grossman |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: PA
Age: 47
Posts: 17,460
|
Re: To Read Option, or Not
Quote:
![]()
__________________
Not sent from a Droid, iPhone, Blackberry or toaster Last edited by Monkeydad; 04-26-2013 at 11:59 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: RatherbeinDC, TX
Posts: 3,062
|
Re: To Read Option, or Not
Run and Shoot anyone?
__________________
Lafayette, we're here. HTTR. You wern't a bunch of losers on 10-27-14. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: PA
Age: 47
Posts: 17,460
|
Re: To Read Option, or Not
No need to threaten anyone over internet postings.
__________________
Not sent from a Droid, iPhone, Blackberry or toaster |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Washington, D.C.
Posts: 4,117
|
Re: To Read Option, or Not
Nah. Wasn't the old Houston Oilers one of the last teams to run that offense? I like the read option because it's highly successful and puts all types of stress on a defense.
__________________
Touchdown Washington Redskins!!! |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Hail Raiser
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 100,050
|
Re: To Read Option, or Not
Don't get sucked into the vortex.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Contains football related knowledge
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Second Star On The Right
Age: 63
Posts: 10,401
|
You'll notice I am still sitting quietly in the corner. I concede, however, that I am pointing and laughing at a certain someone's devotion to stupidity.
__________________
Strap it up, hold onto the ball, and let’s go. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Contains football related knowledge
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Second Star On The Right
Age: 63
Posts: 10,401
|
Clearly, you know nothing about football.
__________________
Strap it up, hold onto the ball, and let’s go. |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
MVP
Join Date: May 2004
Age: 47
Posts: 10,164
|
Re: To Read Option, or Not
Ahhhh wrong thread
Last edited by FRPLG; 04-25-2013 at 11:49 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
MVP
Join Date: May 2004
Age: 47
Posts: 10,164
|
Re: To Read Option, or Not
Same
Last edited by FRPLG; 04-25-2013 at 11:49 PM. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|