![]() |
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
| View Poll Results: What should be the Redskins top priority for the 2008 draft? | |||
| Offensive line |
|
76 | 36.02% |
| Defensive line |
|
94 | 44.55% |
| Linebacker |
|
3 | 1.42% |
| Cornerback |
|
20 | 9.48% |
| Wide receiver |
|
15 | 7.11% |
| other |
|
3 | 1.42% |
| Voters: 211. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Camp Scrub
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Annandale, Va
Posts: 12
|
they need alot of things conerback, wide reciver, O line, and D line
__________________
RIP 21 best saftey ever |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Camp Scrub
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Hinton, WV
Posts: 9
|
Re: Top priority for the 2008 draft
I picked D-Line, but we shouldn't draft just on need, but also on Best Player Available, we need help on both lines, and at line backer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Camp Scrub
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 11
|
Re: Top priority for the 2008 draft
They Need That Talib Cb Outta Kansas If He Hasnt Been Taken Yet So They Can Either Move Springs To (ss) With Landry At (fs) Or Cut Springs On June First And Take The Cap Hit Over The Next Two Years. If That Corner Is Not Available Though You Gotta Gotta Gotta Pray Dereck Harvey (mark My Words) Is Gonna Be There Or Take The Best D Lineman.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Age: 55
Posts: 5,006
|
Re: Top priority for the 2008 draft
I'm amazed that so few see WR as our top priority in the draft. While we surely need depth on both lines, push comes to shove we have starters and reserves for the next 2 seasons.. At WR, there is currently an opening..
Zorn is on record as saying that Randle-El is moving into the slot and he's looking for another WR for the outside. We can hope and pray that Mix is that guy, but that's a stretch considering he's been nothing more than a practice squad guy for the past 3 seasons. Other than that we're counting on Caldwell (if he re-signs), McCardell (if he re-signs) or James Thrash? Yikes. We've spent one first round pick (Campbell) on offense in the past 5 years, it's time to upgrade the WR corp.
__________________
Paintrain's Redskins Fandom 1981-2014 I'm not dead but this team is dead to me...but now that McCloughan is here they may have new life! Jay Gruden = Zorny McSpurrier Kirk Cousins = Next Grossman |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Inactive
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: DC Metro Area
Age: 48
Posts: 5,829
|
Re: Top priority for the 2008 draft
Quote:
But it really doesn't mean anything, however I do not think that there is a tall WR worth a first round selection in this years draft. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Age: 55
Posts: 5,006
|
Re: Top priority for the 2008 draft
Quote:
Who would you compare Devin Thomas, Malcolm Kelly or Limas Sweed to in the NFL?
__________________
Paintrain's Redskins Fandom 1981-2014 I'm not dead but this team is dead to me...but now that McCloughan is here they may have new life! Jay Gruden = Zorny McSpurrier Kirk Cousins = Next Grossman |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Inactive
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: DC Metro Area
Age: 48
Posts: 5,829
|
Re: Top priority for the 2008 draft
Quote:
On a side note if Rogers can rehab to the level he was playing at, then he was worth the pick. If not, then it was a waste, but only because of a career ending injury. I realize of course, that you opinion differs and that Rogers hasn't done much, but even with that said, the Skins have drafted more quality DB's than WR's in the first round. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Age: 55
Posts: 5,006
|
Re: Top priority for the 2008 draft
Quote:
__________________
Paintrain's Redskins Fandom 1981-2014 I'm not dead but this team is dead to me...but now that McCloughan is here they may have new life! Jay Gruden = Zorny McSpurrier Kirk Cousins = Next Grossman |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 38
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: Top priority for the 2008 draft
Good points angry, and the idea here is to pick receivers behind their graded slot. You can't do that if you are picking them in the top ten, so it makes sense to wait a little bit and grab them when you have good value.
And if the rest of the league decides to collectively overvalue receiving talent and you can't land anyone behind slot...then just say whatever and beat them with a running game and a great defense (or just get a great QB who can win with scrubs at WR).
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Another Year, another mess.
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,581
|
Re: Top priority for the 2008 draft
it's funny we've gone through the dan snyder era with a lack of a wideouts and defensive ends 2 positions that where our strongest before his arrival.
__________________
That got ugly fast |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Camp Scrub
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Mel Kiper-ville
Posts: 5
|
Re: Top priority for the 2008 draft
I'd say cornerback.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|