Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Top priority for the 2008 draft

Locker Room Main Forum


View Poll Results: What should be the Redskins top priority for the 2008 draft?
Offensive line 76 36.02%
Defensive line 94 44.55%
Linebacker 3 1.42%
Cornerback 20 9.48%
Wide receiver 15 7.11%
other 3 1.42%
Voters: 211. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-26-2008, 04:10 PM   #1
redskinsX89
Camp Scrub
 
redskinsX89's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Annandale, Va
Posts: 12
Cool Re: Top priority for the 2008 draft

they need alot of things conerback, wide reciver, O line, and D line
__________________
RIP 21 best saftey ever
redskinsX89 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-13-2008, 12:35 PM   #2
Veretax
Camp Scrub
 
Veretax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Hinton, WV
Posts: 9
Re: Top priority for the 2008 draft

I picked D-Line, but we shouldn't draft just on need, but also on Best Player Available, we need help on both lines, and at line backer.
Veretax is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-22-2008, 03:16 PM   #3
EveryHomeGameSince87
Camp Scrub
 
EveryHomeGameSince87's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 11
Re: Top priority for the 2008 draft

They Need That Talib Cb Outta Kansas If He Hasnt Been Taken Yet So They Can Either Move Springs To (ss) With Landry At (fs) Or Cut Springs On June First And Take The Cap Hit Over The Next Two Years. If That Corner Is Not Available Though You Gotta Gotta Gotta Pray Dereck Harvey (mark My Words) Is Gonna Be There Or Take The Best D Lineman.
EveryHomeGameSince87 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-25-2008, 09:32 AM   #4
Paintrain
Pro Bowl
 
Paintrain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Age: 55
Posts: 5,006
Re: Top priority for the 2008 draft

I'm amazed that so few see WR as our top priority in the draft. While we surely need depth on both lines, push comes to shove we have starters and reserves for the next 2 seasons.. At WR, there is currently an opening..

Zorn is on record as saying that Randle-El is moving into the slot and he's looking for another WR for the outside. We can hope and pray that Mix is that guy, but that's a stretch considering he's been nothing more than a practice squad guy for the past 3 seasons. Other than that we're counting on Caldwell (if he re-signs), McCardell (if he re-signs) or James Thrash? Yikes.

We've spent one first round pick (Campbell) on offense in the past 5 years, it's time to upgrade the WR corp.
__________________
Paintrain's Redskins Fandom
1981-2014

I'm not dead but this team is dead to me...but now that McCloughan is here they may have new life!

Jay Gruden = Zorny McSpurrier
Kirk Cousins = Next Grossman
Paintrain is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-25-2008, 09:38 AM   #5
KLHJ2
Inactive
 
KLHJ2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: DC Metro Area
Age: 48
Posts: 5,829
Re: Top priority for the 2008 draft

Quote:
Originally Posted by Paintrain View Post
I'm amazed that so few see WR as our top priority in the draft. While we surely need depth on both lines, push comes to shove we have starters and reserves for the next 2 seasons.. At WR, there is currently an opening..

Zorn is on record as saying that Randle-El is moving into the slot and he's looking for another WR for the outside. We can hope and pray that Mix is that guy, but that's a stretch considering he's been nothing more than a practice squad guy for the past 3 seasons. Other than that we're counting on Caldwell (if he re-signs), McCardell (if he re-signs) or James Thrash? Yikes.

We've spent one first round pick (Campbell) on offense in the past 5 years, it's time to upgrade the WR corp.
We have had bad luck drafting WR's in the first round. Howard, Westbrook, and Gardner. We have been more fortunate taking DB's Green, Bailey, Taylor, and Rogers.

But it really doesn't mean anything, however I do not think that there is a tall WR worth a first round selection in this years draft.
KLHJ2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-25-2008, 09:44 AM   #6
Paintrain
Pro Bowl
 
Paintrain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Age: 55
Posts: 5,006
Re: Top priority for the 2008 draft

Quote:
Originally Posted by angryssg View Post
We have had bad luck drafting WR's in the first round. Howard, Westbrook, and Gardner. We have been more fortunate taking DB's Green, Bailey, Taylor, and Rogers.

But it really doesn't mean anything, however I do not think that there is a tall WR worth a first round selection in this years draft.
Well I'd debate you on Rogers being a good pick, I think we completely botched that offseason which led us to over-drafting for need (hand of stone Rogers) rather than best player available (Ware or Merriman).. Rogers has still done nothing IMO to justify his draft status/position.

Who would you compare Devin Thomas, Malcolm Kelly or Limas Sweed to in the NFL?
__________________
Paintrain's Redskins Fandom
1981-2014

I'm not dead but this team is dead to me...but now that McCloughan is here they may have new life!

Jay Gruden = Zorny McSpurrier
Kirk Cousins = Next Grossman
Paintrain is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-25-2008, 09:55 AM   #7
KLHJ2
Inactive
 
KLHJ2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: DC Metro Area
Age: 48
Posts: 5,829
Re: Top priority for the 2008 draft

Quote:
Originally Posted by Paintrain View Post
Well I'd debate you on Rogers being a good pick, I think we completely botched that offseason which led us to over-drafting for need (hand of stone Rogers) rather than best player available (Ware or Merriman).. Rogers has still done nothing IMO to justify his draft status/position.

Who would you compare Devin Thomas, Malcolm Kelly or Limas Sweed to in the NFL?
I wouldn't compare them to anyone because I haven't seen them play a single snap in the NFL. Just like Bill Parcells will not use a 1st round pick on a RB, I do not believe in using one on WR.

On a side note if Rogers can rehab to the level he was playing at, then he was worth the pick. If not, then it was a waste, but only because of a career ending injury.

I realize of course, that you opinion differs and that Rogers hasn't done much, but even with that said, the Skins have drafted more quality DB's than WR's in the first round.
KLHJ2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-25-2008, 10:10 AM   #8
Paintrain
Pro Bowl
 
Paintrain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Age: 55
Posts: 5,006
Re: Top priority for the 2008 draft

Quote:
Originally Posted by angryssg View Post
I wouldn't compare them to anyone because I haven't seen them play a single snap in the NFL. Just like Bill Parcells will not use a 1st round pick on a RB, I do not believe in using one on WR.

On a side note if Rogers can rehab to the level he was playing at, then he was worth the pick. If not, then it was a waste, but only because of a career ending injury.

I realize of course, that you opinion differs and that Rogers hasn't done much, but even with that said, the Skins have drafted more quality DB's than WR's in the first round.
So you just don't think WR should be picked in the 1st round period then? Yeah, we just disagree on Rogers. I think he's a complete waste of a 1st round pick but to your overall point, I agree we drafted more quality DB than WR in the 1st round.
__________________
Paintrain's Redskins Fandom
1981-2014

I'm not dead but this team is dead to me...but now that McCloughan is here they may have new life!

Jay Gruden = Zorny McSpurrier
Kirk Cousins = Next Grossman
Paintrain is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-25-2008, 04:22 PM   #9
GTripp0012
Living Legend
 
GTripp0012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 38
Posts: 15,994
Re: Top priority for the 2008 draft

Good points angry, and the idea here is to pick receivers behind their graded slot. You can't do that if you are picking them in the top ten, so it makes sense to wait a little bit and grab them when you have good value.

And if the rest of the league decides to collectively overvalue receiving talent and you can't land anyone behind slot...then just say whatever and beat them with a running game and a great defense (or just get a great QB who can win with scrubs at WR).
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation.
GTripp0012 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-29-2008, 11:39 PM   #10
diehardskin2982
Another Year, another mess.
 
diehardskin2982's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,581
Re: Top priority for the 2008 draft

it's funny we've gone through the dan snyder era with a lack of a wideouts and defensive ends 2 positions that where our strongest before his arrival.
__________________
That got ugly fast
diehardskin2982 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-2008, 12:37 AM   #11
leisureworld
Camp Scrub
 
leisureworld's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Mel Kiper-ville
Posts: 5
Re: Top priority for the 2008 draft

I'd say cornerback.
leisureworld is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:07 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.26888 seconds with 11 queries