![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Detroit area
Posts: 4,153
|
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
Quote:
True, but at least he had heart!!!!! And unless JC gets the TD machine going Gus will still be over JC in passing TDs as a Skin at year's end!!!!!!!!! Also, did Gus have the weapons like JC does now? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 38
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
He didn't have a Cooley comparable, but then again, Campbell's numbers are just better. So Cooley might help to explain that.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Hail Raiser
![]() Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 100,038
|
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
Quote:
And I wouldn't brag too hard on his numbers... they were less than impressive. In fact they were pretty mediocre. Gus Frerotte NFL & AFL Football Statistics | Pro-Football-Reference.com |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Detroit area
Posts: 4,153
|
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
Quote:
Ellard was on the downslope of his career at that point, so was Leslie Shepard. He also didn't have a Cooley to save his ass either. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 38
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
Quote:
Maybe there's something intangible that Campbell is missing that contributes to the offensive disorganization. But it never looks like the game is too fast for him out there, if anything, it looks like he wants to get out there and run plays faster than Zorn can get them in. I put the disorganization on Zorn, not Campbell lacking in intangibles.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Detroit area
Posts: 4,153
|
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
Quote:
Gus Frerotte Rules!!!! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 22,379
|
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
Quote:
As I said, I wish Campbell was a terrible QB so these morons had something to complain about.
__________________
R.I.P. #21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Detroit area
Posts: 4,153
|
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
Quote:
Dude I am having fun here. Cut the crap. I don't hate on JC at all. Read the original post. I say that JC isn't the main reason, but he does have to bear some brunt of the blame. A coach can only do so much til it rests in the hands of the players to execute. This is just another crazy stream of funny rants by me Gus Frerotte. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 3,634
|
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
Quote:
__________________
www.islandstyleflowers.com Home of the Hawaiian Foam Flowers and Kukui Nut Leis. Great selections and best prices. Redskins Fan Since 1972 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Detroit area
Posts: 4,153
|
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
God I miss the early Norv days. I think I am going to get a Frerotte jersey now!!!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Camp Scrub
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 47
|
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
campbell is mark brunell jr. he is a happy looser.
__________________
not an expert, just a fan. |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
Gus had Brian Mitchell
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 38
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
Part of the reason Stafford looked poised is because he never had to go past his first read all day.
The exception to the rule was the 3rd and 14 play following the accepted holding penalty when he ran for 22 yards.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
Special Teams
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: garfield new jersey
Posts: 158
|
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
stop it he stinks,who cares what the numbers say,in big spots he is a dear in headlights enough said,.......
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Special Teams
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Silver Spring, MD
Posts: 478
|
Re: Campbell's numbers dont lie
Stats are usually good indicators, but can be deceiving...
1) JC gets a high completion percentage b/c he throws short and/or safe passes. Usually this is a good thing, especially when nursing a lead, but as we all know, the redskins have not had this luxury for quite some time. A QB should take risk so in order to balance out the completions % stat, u must look at number of pass plays over 20 yards (a category which, JC has been very sub-par over his career). Also completing passes that are short of a first down on 3rd and long are about as good as incompletions and should be accounted for in such instances. The OP mentioned Chad Pennington (who has the highest completion % among active QB's), but who here really considers him to be an elite QB. His completion % is very much deceptive in the same way JC's is. 2) Lack of TD's by a QB is one of the 3 most important statistical categories. How can someone doing a statistical analysis of his play neglect this or offer to reconcile his deficiency in this category? It is an absolutely telling stat about the offensive production of the team of which JC should be the field general. It ultimately falls on his shoulders, more than any player, and if he can't at least average 2 TD's a game, you cannot make the assertion that he is anywhere near the top 10 statistically. Just think 2 TD's in a game for JC was actually a GOOD day for him, compared to what is expected of the other elites of the NFL (which would be an average-to-poor showing). 3) JC gets a decent amount of passing yards because of two reasons: (1) We have receivers who r great at getting YAC (which is partly to his credit for putting the ball where it needs to be but largely are a product of the receivers' (ARE, Moss, and Cooley) skill set); (2) Often times he is forced to get big yardage in the second half and at the ends of games b/c it is a close game or we are down and we need to throw to catch up. He tends to rack up yards against prevent defenses (which again is to his credit) but had he is largely responsible for putting the team in that come-from-behind mode in the first place. Think about a typical game for Manning, Brees, or Brady. They are racking up yards and completions throughout the game. I don't know if u guys have been watching the same skins that I have for the past 3 years but it seems like we have 1 or 2 drives in the first half and then go away for an extended period of time only to have to rally back late in the game. Good QB's don't put themselves in this position most of the times. 4) To go one step further great QB's have confidence in their play (and instill confidence in the coaching staff) to the point where they are being aggressive even with a small lead. Nobody has the type of confidence in JC to allow him to try to rack up yards late in a close game to put the game out of reach... why? Isn't this the same QB who has a great completion % and low INT rate? The stats say you should want him to throw it, but seldom do you see this. Yes, we have had a great running game in the past, but you can't start nursing a lead halfway thru the 3rd quarter. Yes, we've had O-line injuries in the past, but which team hasn't? At this level you must be able to adapt. The bottom line is that JC doesn't have that killer instinct (or his coaches don't have faith that he does), but either way some of the blame for that falls on him. More importantly, this lack of execution/faith is reflected in his play even though it may be lost in his padded stats. Ultimately it comes down to W's and L's and as we all know JC has been an average QB by this most important metric...
__________________
McNasty FTW! |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|