Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Schefter: "Skins NOT shopping Big Al"

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-08-2010, 05:50 PM   #121
Mechanix544
The Starter
 
Mechanix544's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Fort Bliss, TX
Posts: 2,277
Re: Schefter: "Skins NOT shopping Big Al"

Quote:
Originally Posted by tryfuhl View Post
Yeah and he played in games he could've skipped just as easily. He could be pushing it harder than our guys are now, who knows.
"FAT" chance
Mechanix544 is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 04-08-2010, 05:56 PM   #122
tryfuhl
Gamebreaker
 
tryfuhl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Waldorf, MD
Age: 41
Posts: 12,514
Re: Schefter: "Skins NOT shopping Big Al"

Well I'm glad that you guys have such great inside sources.
tryfuhl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2010, 10:47 PM   #123
DIE-NASTY
Special Teams
 
DIE-NASTY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: OCEAN PINES, MD
Posts: 121
Re: Schefter: "Skins NOT shopping Big Al"

Quote:
Originally Posted by CRedskinsRule View Post
you do realize that these are voluntary and that if the Skins management team looked like they were forcing AH to be there, they could be fined or have draft picks taken away right? AH has said he's not going to miss any mandatory ones.
If you reread my post, I never said anything about attending the voluntary workouts.

I just don't think a (professional) player that makes an obscene amount of money has the right to decline a request to play a position their coach wants them to play. It's not unreasonable for our best defensive lineman to play NT. They're not asking him to play safety or guard. They're asking him move down the line and knuckle up. It's not unreasonable at all.
DIE-NASTY is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2010, 10:50 PM   #124
DIE-NASTY
Special Teams
 
DIE-NASTY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: OCEAN PINES, MD
Posts: 121
Re: Schefter: "Skins NOT shopping Big Al"

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ruhskins View Post
So you're ok with our coaching staff having players play out of position?

I thought that ended with Blache retiring.
Playing Lorenzo Alexander at OLB is playing a player out of position. Playing AH at NT isn't.

Who should play NT if not AH? Montgomery? The guy looks like he on skates when he plays. Golston? Who?
DIE-NASTY is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2010, 10:52 PM   #125
Pocket$ $traight
Registered User
 
Pocket$ $traight's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Fairfax, VA
Age: 48
Posts: 4,261
Re: Schefter: "Skins NOT shopping Big Al"

Quote:
Originally Posted by DIE-NASTY View Post
Playing Lorenzo Alexander at OLB is playing a player out of position. Playing AH at NT isn't.

Who should play NT if not AH? Montgomery? The guy looks like he on skates when he plays. Golston? Who?

I think the goal is for Kemo to do it but he is still a big ?
Pocket$ $traight is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2010, 11:17 PM   #126
DIE-NASTY
Special Teams
 
DIE-NASTY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: OCEAN PINES, MD
Posts: 121
Re: Schefter: "Skins NOT shopping Big Al"

For me it's more about the principle. Maybe I'm old school but I don't believe in pandering to over-paid athletes. Kemo if he ever gets healthy is an ideal NT (i forgot we'd signed him) but like you said, that's a big if.
DIE-NASTY is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2010, 11:46 PM   #127
internetcareer
Camp Scrub
 
internetcareer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Alexandria
Posts: 89
Re: Schefter: "Skins NOT shopping Big Al"

Quote:
Originally Posted by DIE-NASTY View Post
Playing Lorenzo Alexander at OLB is playing a player out of position. Playing AH at NT isn't.

Who should play NT if not AH? Montgomery? The guy looks like he on skates when he plays. Golston? Who?
Question for you: does Montgomery look like he is on ICE skates or ROLLER skates. Cause that will make a difference in his play. (lol)
internetcareer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2010, 12:09 AM   #128
Dirtbag59
Naega jeil jal naga
 
Dirtbag59's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlanta, Georgia From: Silver Spring, Maryland
Age: 39
Posts: 14,750
Re: Schefter: "Skins NOT shopping Big Al"

Quote:
Originally Posted by internetcareer View Post
Question for you: does Montgomery look like he is on ICE skates or ROLLER skates. Cause that will make a difference in his play. (lol)
Not as similar as you might think.
__________________
"It's nice to be important, but its more important to be nice."
- Scooter

"I feel like Dirtbag has been slowly and methodically trolling the board for a month or so now."
- FRPLG
Dirtbag59 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2010, 12:50 AM   #129
tryfuhl
Gamebreaker
 
tryfuhl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Waldorf, MD
Age: 41
Posts: 12,514
Re: Schefter: "Skins NOT shopping Big Al"

Quote:
Originally Posted by DIE-NASTY View Post
If you reread my post, I never said anything about attending the voluntary workouts.

I just don't think a (professional) player that makes an obscene amount of money has the right to decline a request to play a position their coach wants them to play. It's not unreasonable for our best defensive lineman to play NT. They're not asking him to play safety or guard. They're asking him move down the line and knuckle up. It's not unreasonable at all.
He said he'd play wherever they put him, but of course he'll have a preference.
tryfuhl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2010, 01:30 AM   #130
CRedskinsRule
Living Legend
 
CRedskinsRule's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Age: 57
Posts: 21,429
Re: Schefter: "Skins NOT shopping Big Al"

Quote:
Originally Posted by DIE-NASTY View Post
If you reread my post, I never said anything about attending the voluntary workouts.

I just don't think a (professional) player that makes an obscene amount of money has the right to decline a request to play a position their coach wants them to play. It's not unreasonable for our best defensive lineman to play NT. They're not asking him to play safety or guard. They're asking him move down the line and knuckle up. It's not unreasonable at all.
I did mis-understand your post, I thought you were saying if Shanahan says he wants everyone there, than AH ought to be at the voluntary workouts.

To the other, if your employer tells you to do something you and you think you could do a different task better, are you saying you wouldn't try to discuss it with him. NFL players just have more spotlights, and AH has a ton more. Did AH ever not play a down where Blache told him to play? IF Haslett tells him to play NT, do you think he will simply not go out onto the field? If he's on the team he will do whatever football position is asked of him, will he be the happiest camper probably not, and if it's really out of his comfort zone then I imagine he won't be as good at it, or as motivated. This is no different than any other employee in a business. Shanahan/Haslett will either fit him into the scheme and get him to buy in, or he will be a good player who never lives up to his potential. But he's not going to just walk off the field and pout.
CRedskinsRule is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2010, 02:46 AM   #131
Ruhskins
Living Legend
 
Ruhskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 22,341
Re: Schefter: "Skins NOT shopping Big Al"

Quote:
Originally Posted by DIE-NASTY View Post
Playing Lorenzo Alexander at OLB is playing a player out of position. Playing AH at NT isn't.

Who should play NT if not AH? Montgomery? The guy looks like he on skates when he plays. Golston? Who?
Kemo was brought in to play NT, and any pundit with half a brain knows that the Redskins need a true 3-4 NT (since basically you depend on Kemo being healthy).
__________________
R.I.P. #21
Ruhskins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2010, 05:23 AM   #132
skins89moss
Playmaker
 
skins89moss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 3,634
Re: Schefter: "Skins NOT shopping Big Al"

The Redskins are not trading Hanyesworth unless its for a top 3 draft pick this season. We would have another hole to fill then. We be better off hoping to move Andre Carter and JC and hope to get a least 3rd picks for each. Why do the Redskins every year have limited draft picks. This just doesnt seem to work every year they try this same old crap of giving up draft picks. Maybe Jarmon can start at DE in the 3-4 defense. We look like we just wasted a 3rd pick on him if he can not play in the 3-4 defense.
__________________
www.islandstyleflowers.com Home of the Hawaiian Foam Flowers and Kukui Nut Leis. Great selections and best prices. Redskins Fan Since 1972
skins89moss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2010, 07:41 AM   #133
SmootSmack
Uncle Phil
 
SmootSmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
Re: Schefter: "Skins NOT shopping Big Al"

Top 3 as in Rams, Lions, or Bucs? Can't see that happening.
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You
SmootSmack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2010, 09:21 AM   #134
BigHairedAristocrat
Playmaker
 
BigHairedAristocrat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 4,712
Re: Schefter: "Skins NOT shopping Big Al"

Quote:
Originally Posted by SmootSmack View Post
Top 3 as in Rams, Lions, or Bucs? Can't see that happening.
maybe he means top 3 in the 2nd round? i'd absolutely love to get the lions 2nd round pick. with a whole night to sit on the pick, we'd certainly get all sorts of interesting trade offers. or, if we had the pick, we'd have plenty of time to make sure we were making the best selection.
__________________
Dolphins get good press for saving drowning humans.But we only hear about the swimmers theyve pushed ashore.You know who we havent heard from: all the people theyve pushed out to sea.Dolphins dont know what theyre doing-they just like pushing things.
BigHairedAristocrat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2010, 11:07 AM   #135
Pocket$ $traight
Registered User
 
Pocket$ $traight's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Fairfax, VA
Age: 48
Posts: 4,261
Re: Schefter: "Skins NOT shopping Big Al"

Quote:
Originally Posted by skins89moss View Post
The Redskins are not trading Hanyesworth unless its for a top 3 draft pick this season. We would have another hole to fill then. We be better off hoping to move Andre Carter and JC and hope to get a least 3rd picks for each. Why do the Redskins every year have limited draft picks. This just doesnt seem to work every year they try this same old crap of giving up draft picks. Maybe Jarmon can start at DE in the 3-4 defense. We look like we just wasted a 3rd pick on him if he can not play in the 3-4 defense.
What makes you think this? I really am curious why you think our FO would expect that type of compensation. What precedent is there that a team would send a top 3 pick in the first round for a locker room cancer? Granted, Al is talented, arguably the most talented defensive tackle in the league, but he is a huge pain in the ass. I have argued that no team would give us any first round pick for him, let alone a top 3 pick.

I know we fleeced Carolina for Sean Gilbert but the league has changed dramatically since then. If a GM sent us a top 3 pick, they are putting their job on the line for a guy who doesn't give a crap what his coaches want.

For the record, I still want him on the team. I think if you are paying a coach 7.5 million he can figure out a solution with your problem child but I certainly understand where Shanahan is coming from on this.
Pocket$ $traight is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:54 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 2.82407 seconds with 10 queries