Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


John Clayton on LaVar Arrington 2/20/06

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-20-2006, 07:31 PM   #1
Big C
Mr. Brightside
 
Big C's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Leesburg, VA
Age: 38
Posts: 4,453
John Clayton on LaVar Arrington 2/20/06

John Clayton, when asked if lavar would be a cap casualty, said that we were trying to trade lavar and that he would probably not get the roster bonus he is due...bad news if u ask me
__________________
"I don't care what nobody say I'm a be me, stay hood stay real, cause I'm out here grindin'" -Joe Gibbs
Big C is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 02-20-2006, 08:07 PM   #2
saskin
Special Teams
 
saskin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: San Antonio
Age: 36
Posts: 355
Re: John Clayton on LaVar Arrington 2/20/06

I wanna see Lavar here....but that salary is huge and we need to cut cap room.
saskin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-20-2006, 08:31 PM   #3
PSUskinsfan11
Impact Rookie
 
PSUskinsfan11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: the port, PA
Age: 40
Posts: 692
Re: John Clayton on LaVar Arrington 2/20/06

I thought there was a rumor that he was actually going to restructure?
If it's true that they are trying to trade him I am going be real pissed.
__________________
R.I.P. ST
21.....never forgotten
PSUskinsfan11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-20-2006, 08:51 PM   #4
That Guy
Living Legend
 
That Guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: VA
Age: 42
Posts: 17,553
Re: John Clayton on LaVar Arrington 2/20/06

he might only be willing to restructure a mill instead of whats needed. if he' not cut, than that 6.5mill compound an already insane contract that's going to have to be dealt with sooner or later (he stays and we get an awful cap problem next year too).
That Guy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-20-2006, 08:54 PM   #5
dmek25
MVP
 
dmek25's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: lancaster,pa
Age: 63
Posts: 10,672
Re: John Clayton on LaVar Arrington 2/20/06

his contract needs to be dealt with,for once and for all.either restructure so everyone can live with it,or cut him loose.i want him to stay but not at the price of destroying the cap situation of the redskins
__________________
"It's better to be quiet and thought a fool than to open ones mouth and remove all doubt."
courtesy of 53fan
dmek25 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-20-2006, 10:28 PM   #6
mooby
Hug Anne Spyder
 
mooby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 20,468
Re: John Clayton on LaVar Arrington 2/20/06

i hope this isn't true, i still think lavar can get back to top form again. Hopefully he restructures so we can clear up some cap room.
__________________
Hail to the Football Team
mooby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-20-2006, 10:38 PM   #7
Schneed10
A Dude
 
Schneed10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Newtown Square, PA
Age: 45
Posts: 12,422
Re: John Clayton on LaVar Arrington 2/20/06

I want him traded.
__________________
God made certain people to play football. He was one of them.
Schneed10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-20-2006, 11:04 PM   #8
saden1
MVP
 
saden1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Seattle
Age: 45
Posts: 10,069
Re: John Clayton on LaVar Arrington 2/20/06

Trying to trade him? That doesn't make sense. Any team that is willing to trade for him will want to restructure his current contract, preferably in a sign and trade deal, but if LaVar is not willing to restructure to stay here why would he be willing to for another team? Especially since he can have himself cut by the Skins and enter free agency and choose his own team.

If this trade thing is true then the relationship between the Skins and LaVar is beyond repair and he'll do whatever it takes to get the hell out of DC or the Skins management must subscribe to the "you can find a sucker" theory.
__________________
"The Redskins have always suffered from chronic organizational deformities under Snyder."

-Jenkins
saden1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-20-2006, 11:20 PM   #9
wilsowilso
Registered User
 
wilsowilso's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Age: 51
Posts: 2,841
Re: John Clayton on LaVar Arrington 2/20/06

Seems like we just have to come to terms with the fact that LaVar is not going to remain a Redskin and we probably won't be getting jack for him. If someone can explain to me how we could possibly afford that mega-cap hit if we trade him then I guess I'm hoping for good value. I'm all for keeping him, but I would be shocked if that happens. By the way if they do release him and he signs with a team from the NFC East that would officially be the perfect nightmare ending to this mess.
wilsowilso is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2006, 12:35 AM   #10
mooby
Hug Anne Spyder
 
mooby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 20,468
Re: John Clayton on LaVar Arrington 2/20/06

he's also said if the redskins cut or trade him he would consider retiring, because he doesn't want to play for another team. I don't think we will see him traded to an NFC East team, or going there if he got cut. And besides, if we wanted to cut or trade lavar, we'd have to get rid of 32 million on our cap. I don't think that would happen.
__________________
Hail to the Football Team
mooby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2006, 02:01 AM   #11
That Guy
Living Legend
 
That Guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: VA
Age: 42
Posts: 17,553
Re: John Clayton on LaVar Arrington 2/20/06

Quote:
Originally Posted by mooby
he's also said if the redskins cut or trade him he would consider retiring, because he doesn't want to play for another team. I don't think we will see him traded to an NFC East team, or going there if he got cut. And besides, if we wanted to cut or trade lavar, we'd have to get rid of 32 million on our cap. I don't think that would happen.
32million? its either 12mill or 6-7mill if he's sacked before the 6.5mill bonus happens.
That Guy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2006, 02:29 AM   #12
Master4Caster
Special Teams
 
Master4Caster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: DC area
Posts: 374
Re: John Clayton on LaVar Arrington 2/20/06

I hope it works out that we keep Lavar, but Marcus Washington is the number one linebacker now and would be even if we keep Arrington.
Master4Caster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2006, 03:24 AM   #13
offiss
Registered User
 
offiss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: sparta, new jersey [ northern jersey ]
Age: 60
Posts: 3,097
Re: John Clayton on LaVar Arrington 2/20/06

The sooner the better, he's nothing more than a paycheck and a cap killer.
offiss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2006, 10:19 AM   #14
ArtMonkDrillz
Franchise Player
 
ArtMonkDrillz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Ellicott City, MD
Age: 42
Posts: 8,029
Re: John Clayton on LaVar Arrington 2/20/06

Would Pitt be willing to give us musch for LaVar? I know he's from there and I've heard rumors in the past that he would be interested in playing there (I bet especially now that just one the big one), but would they want him? It seems like Pitt always has good linemen on both sides of the ball, I wonder if we could get anything worth value from them.

I know that the Steeler's are a bit more thrifty than Danny-boy, so I doubt they would want LaVar's huge contract, but still, any thoughts?
__________________
"Yeah, well, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man." The Dude
ArtMonkDrillz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2006, 10:47 AM   #15
amorentz
Special Teams
 
amorentz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Washington, DC
Age: 44
Posts: 368
Re: John Clayton on LaVar Arrington 2/20/06

Quote:
Originally Posted by That Guy
32million? its either 12mill or 6-7mill if he's sacked before the 6.5mill bonus happens.
It'll cost 12.8m to cut him and ~12m to keep him. The high cap number for cutting him comes from the remaining prorated signing bonus, not any option bonus that we are paying him. The only way to get it to 7m is if the CBA is extended and we can take advantage of the June 1 cuts, pushing 5m into 2007.
amorentz is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:00 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 4.24348 seconds with 10 queries