Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Stephen Davis

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-28-2006, 05:44 AM   #1
Luxorreb
^21^
 
Luxorreb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Richmond, Virginia
Age: 52
Posts: 1,630
Stephen Davis

According to NFL.com the Panthers are probably gonna cut Stephen Davis in the next week. Do we have a use for him? I'd be willing to sign him at a league minimum. Any thoughts on where he might end up? Does he have gas left in the tank?
__________________
^21^
Luxorreb is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 02-28-2006, 06:38 AM   #2
That Guy
Living Legend
 
That Guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: VA
Age: 42
Posts: 17,553
Re: Stephen Davis

no, he doesn't, he hit the wall, he's always been injury prone and its a wasted roster spot... plus he still thinks the skins did him wrong by not giving him 10mill a year.
That Guy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2006, 10:22 AM   #3
MTK
\m/
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,518
Re: Stephen Davis

We hit on this a few weeks ago

http://www.thewarpath.net/showthread...=stephen+davis

I think the answer is still a big fat no. He doesn't have much left.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2006, 11:19 AM   #4
Southpaw
The Starter
 
Southpaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: So. MD
Age: 46
Posts: 1,319
Re: Stephen Davis

Quote:
Originally Posted by That Guy
no, he doesn't, he hit the wall, he's always been injury prone and its a wasted roster spot... plus he still thinks the skins did him wrong by not giving him 10mill a year.
I'm not sure where you're getting the 10mil a year from. It seems a bit of a stretch that he wanted 10mil a year, when he had just restructured his deal, the season before he was cut, to help create cap room for the team. That deal was about 6.5mil a year. When he was cut, he settled on a a deal with Carolina, for about 3mil a year. That's a pretty big step down from 10mil a year.

As far as him coming back to Washington; I don't think he has enough left in the tank to be productive.
Southpaw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2006, 11:28 AM   #5
That Guy
Living Legend
 
That Guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: VA
Age: 42
Posts: 17,553
Re: Stephen Davis

Quote:
Originally Posted by Southpaw
I'm not sure where you're getting the 10mil a year from. It seems a bit of a stretch that he wanted 10mil a year, when he had just restructured his deal, the season before he was cut, to help create cap room for the team. That deal was about 6.5mil a year. When he was cut, he settled on a a deal with Carolina, for about 3mil a year. That's a pretty big step down from 10mil a year.

As far as him coming back to Washington; I don't think he has enough left in the tank to be productive.
it was the headline when spurrier decided to say no thanks.

6.5 would have been way too much too.
That Guy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2006, 11:40 AM   #6
#56fanatic
The Starter
 
#56fanatic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Charlotte NC
Age: 50
Posts: 1,801
Re: Stephen Davis

I much as I liked Davis when he was a Redskin and feel he should retire a Redskin, I dont think he has a place on this team. we have Betts as the back up and Broughton will play a bigger role this year on short yardage, and if he plays well could get a few carries during the games.
#56fanatic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2006, 11:54 AM   #7
dmek25
MVP
 
dmek25's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: lancaster,pa
Age: 63
Posts: 10,672
Re: Stephen Davis

i would bring him back at league mininum for a third down,short yardage back to try an save some wear and tear on c portis
__________________
"It's better to be quiet and thought a fool than to open ones mouth and remove all doubt."
courtesy of 53fan
dmek25 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2006, 12:01 PM   #8
cpayne5
Playmaker
 
cpayne5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,807
Re: Stephen Davis

Quote:
Originally Posted by Southpaw
I'm not sure where you're getting the 10mil a year from. It seems a bit of a stretch that he wanted 10mil a year, when he had just restructured his deal, the season before he was cut, to help create cap room for the team. That deal was about 6.5mil a year. When he was cut, he settled on a a deal with Carolina, for about 3mil a year. That's a pretty big step down from 10mil a year.

As far as him coming back to Washington; I don't think he has enough left in the tank to be productive.
The $10mill figure comes from the 9 year/ $90million contract he signed in 2000.
__________________
"It's not about what you've done, but what's been done for you."
cpayne5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2006, 12:11 PM   #9
celts32
Playmaker
 
celts32's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Hackettstown NJ
Age: 53
Posts: 2,665
Re: Stephen Davis

That ships sailed. He's done. he can't play anymore. It's a waste of a roster spot...

The short yardage back the skins should try and aquire is TJ Ducket who Atlanta is shopping in trade right now. He can probably be had for a mid to low round draft choice.
__________________
Section 116 Row 19

“Goal line, goal line. I-left, tight wing, 70 chip on white.”

www.facebook.com/HackettstownBeerClub
celts32 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2006, 12:15 PM   #10
Sean Taylor is God
Registered User
 
Sean Taylor is God's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 68
Re: Stephen Davis

Quote:
Originally Posted by celts32
That ships sailed. He's done. he can't play anymore. It's a waste of a roster spot...

The short yardage back the skins should try and aquire is TJ Ducket who Atlanta is shopping in trade right now. He can probably be had for a mid to low round draft choice.
he's good in short yardage, but we dont have the space or money for a move like that. we have much more pressing issuses than rb. davis is done.
Sean Taylor is God is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2006, 12:24 PM   #11
celts32
Playmaker
 
celts32's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Hackettstown NJ
Age: 53
Posts: 2,665
Re: Stephen Davis

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sean Taylor is God
he's good in short yardage, but we dont have the space or money for a move like that. we have much more pressing issuses than rb. davis is done.
He doesn't make a lot of money and Atlanta picks up any remaining signing bonus if they trae him. the skins would just need to carry his yearly salary. A short yardage back is not the most pressing need, but it is a need. A team that's identity is running the ball should never need to line up in shot gun on third and 2. Portis is a great back, but short yardage is not his thing. I would like to have someone to use like Gibbs used Riggs in the early 90's. Ducket is filling that same role right now in Atlanta and he's good at it.
__________________
Section 116 Row 19

“Goal line, goal line. I-left, tight wing, 70 chip on white.”

www.facebook.com/HackettstownBeerClub
celts32 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2006, 12:25 PM   #12
jdlea
Playmaker
 
jdlea's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Arlington, VA
Age: 40
Posts: 3,109
Re: Stephen Davis

I don't know that I agree that he's necessarily done. If you don't think he can do for a team what Jerome Bettis did, you're kidding yourself. He did have 12 TD's last year. I also remember hearing that Carolina wished they didn't put him on IR cause he could have played in the playoffs.

Stephen Davis is certainly done as an every down back, but in short yardage he still looks like a beast. Trust me, I was in Carolina this season.
jdlea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2006, 12:47 PM   #13
Longtimefan
Playmaker
 
Longtimefan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Germantown, Md.
Posts: 4,832
Re: Stephen Davis

Quote:
Originally Posted by Southpaw
I'm not sure where you're getting the 10mil a year from. It seems a bit of a stretch that he wanted 10mil a year, when he had just restructured his deal, the season before he was cut, to help create cap room for the team. That deal was about 6.5mil a year. When he was cut, he settled on a a deal with Carolina, for about 3mil a year. That's a pretty big step down from 10mil a year.

As far as him coming back to Washington; I don't think he has enough left in the tank to be productive.

Not only that, where would Stephen Davis play in the rotation of backs we already have? There is no place on the team for him even if we could afford him, which we cant. Until there's a CBA we don't need to be thinking about signing anybody when at present we may have to consider cutting some players.
Longtimefan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2006, 01:22 PM   #14
That Guy
Living Legend
 
That Guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: VA
Age: 42
Posts: 17,553
Re: Stephen Davis

Quote:
Originally Posted by celts32
He doesn't make a lot of money and Atlanta picks up any remaining signing bonus if they trae him. the skins would just need to carry his yearly salary. A short yardage back is not the most pressing need, but it is a need. A team that's identity is running the ball should never need to line up in shot gun on third and 2. Portis is a great back, but short yardage is not his thing. I would like to have someone to use like Gibbs used Riggs in the early 90's. Ducket is filling that same role right now in Atlanta and he's good at it.
he'll want a new contract, and what would atlanta want in a trade? if the skins ask first, its going to be more than if he's shopped. we have 7 rbs right now andat least 4 that are #2-#3 quality. portis i fine in short yardage, sellers can do short yardage (280lb) and nemo was brought in to do short yardage. TJ would be a wasted roster spot and contract.
That Guy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-28-2006, 03:27 PM   #15
Sheriff Gonna Getcha
Franchise Player
 
Sheriff Gonna Getcha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 45
Posts: 8,317
Re: Stephen Davis

I like our depth at RB just fine. Plus, why pay a guy to sit on the bench with an injury?Davis was great, but he's way too injury-prone.
Sheriff Gonna Getcha is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:44 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 2.62410 seconds with 10 queries