Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Pathetic!

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-17-2004, 06:55 PM   #1
saden1
MVP
 
saden1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Seattle
Age: 45
Posts: 10,069
Pathetic!

I'm not liking this....not one bit. Brunell is done...he has no rhythm or timing with receivers and he is getting the receivers killed out there...better make the switch while we have the bye week. The Redskins are obviously broke. Gibbs better be having the offense working during the bye week. No reset for them till the balls are zipping and on the spot to the receivers. We couldn't dominate the 27th ranked defense in the league for fuck sake. That's just pathetic.
saden1 is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 10-17-2004, 06:59 PM   #2
RedskinRat
Franchise Player
 
RedskinRat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: I'm in LA, trick!
Posts: 8,700
Saden1, when I'm agreeing with you it's a dark day indeed. I'm agreeing with you.

Brunell bring absolutely nothing, I'm sure he's a nice guy but he's holding the whole team back.
RedskinRat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2004, 07:00 PM   #3
diehardskin2982
Another Year, another mess.
 
diehardskin2982's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,581
ouch doggie, maybe brunnel will realize he sucks and fake injury.
diehardskin2982 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2004, 07:17 PM   #4
ArringtonRules
Special Teams
 
ArringtonRules's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 124
Quote:
Originally Posted by saden1
I'm not liking this....not one bit. Brunell is done...he has no rhythm or timing with receivers and he is getting the receivers killed out there...better make the switch while we have the bye week. The Redskins are obviously broke. Gibbs better be having the offense working during the bye week. No reset for them till the balls are zipping and on the spot to the receivers. We couldn't dominate the 27th ranked defense in the league for fuck sake. That's just pathetic.
Well I'm sad to report after hearing the press conference after the game, Gibbs did'nt seem to find anything wrong with Brunell.. I hope he breaks down the film and realizes that this guys cannot throw deep and most NFL secondary right now DON'T RESPECT our passing game.
Today we had protection, and a good running game and we were playing the Bears who's secondary is not great and BRUNELL CAN'T EVEN COMPLETE HALF of his passes!! Gibbs need to rethink 'cause if our offense keeps on giving opposing teams so many chances and defense on the field for that long WE R GONNA LOSE..
C'MONS GIBBS MAKE THE CHANGE!!!
ArringtonRules is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2004, 07:25 PM   #5
Bozzy
The Starter
 
Bozzy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Columbia, MD
Age: 44
Posts: 1,034
Once again Snyder fucked up the QB situation. He did it before by bringing in Jeff George, and he did it again by bring in Brunell. Dan sure is the man.
Bozzy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2004, 07:30 PM   #6
MTK
\m/
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,518
Brunell is Gibbs guy, let's lay off Snyder
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2004, 07:37 PM   #7
wbecker999
Camp Scrub
 
wbecker999's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Iowa
Age: 49
Posts: 93
We need a time machine to go back to the draft and get Rothlisburger
wbecker999 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2004, 07:38 PM   #8
MTK
\m/
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,518
I'll stick with Taylor over Roethisberger
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2004, 07:53 PM   #9
Paintrain
Pro Bowl
 
Paintrain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Age: 54
Posts: 5,006
I have to question Gibbs on this one.. It's obvious to everyone but him that Brunell isn't the answer. 13 points against the Bears when Portis gained 171? C'mon, I understand loyalty, but this is 2 games under 100 yards passing and less than 50% completion percentage. At least Ramsey will be able to do better than that.
Paintrain is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2004, 07:58 PM   #10
Daseal
Puppy Kicker
 
Daseal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Arlington, Virginia
Age: 41
Posts: 8,341
Bozzy - This Brunell deal is ALL Gibbs. I've actually heard that Snyder didn't want to write that check, but Gibbs is Jesus isn't he?

This game was absolutely pathetic and nothing to get excited for except for Smoot, Washington, Taylor, and Portis (In no particular order). Playcalling was uninspired and boring. It was conservative to a fault. Although there were signs of promise, this offense CAN NOT excel with Mark Brunell at the helm. It's not often, but I was praying for an injury.
Daseal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2004, 08:00 PM   #11
Jamaican'Skin
The Starter
 
Jamaican'Skin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Kingston, Jamaica
Age: 38
Posts: 2,418
Gibbs must be seeing something in Mark that the rest of us aren't. I think the kid (Ramsey) should start, but its not looking too good for that.
Jamaican'Skin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2004, 08:08 PM   #12
offiss
Registered User
 
offiss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: sparta, new jersey [ northern jersey ]
Age: 60
Posts: 3,097
Quote:
Originally Posted by Paintrain
I have to question Gibbs on this one.. It's obvious to everyone but him that Brunell isn't the answer. 13 points against the Bears when Portis gained 171? C'mon, I understand loyalty, but this is 2 games under 100 yards passing and less than 50% completion percentage. At least Ramsey will be able to do better than that.
Agreed! Although I missed today's game I saw some highlights, Portis, wow! Heck of a game, I heard a commentater say the skin's changed their running scheme a bit, is that true? I did see the highlight of Brunell throwing the ball out of bound's when he had I believe it was Coles wide open down the sideline for a TD, as well I see he gave up another TD, 28 point's in 5 1/2 games, I wonder if that's some kind of record? I am now becoming very incouraged thinking how good we can be with Ramsey in there? He will make play's, and he will only get better, Brunell has to go, we can't afford to drop 1 more game because of his inability at QB, I heard a post game comment that we absolutly dominated this game, if that's true, then it's an absolute joke that the bear's had an opportunity to tie, or beat us, with their last possesion, especially when Portis ran for over 170yds., no more excuses for Brunell, and how he need's a running game, he had one and failed miserably, our defense bailed him out big time!
offiss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2004, 10:27 PM   #13
aehs77
Special Teams
 
aehs77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: silver spring
Age: 39
Posts: 486
Quote:
Originally Posted by diehardskin2982
ouch doggie, maybe brunnel will realize he sucks and fake injury.
Maybe sean taylor will realize he sucks and give him one
aehs77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2004, 10:32 PM   #14
aehs77
Special Teams
 
aehs77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: silver spring
Age: 39
Posts: 486
Quote:
Originally Posted by wbecker999
We need a time machine to go back to the draft and get Rothlisburger
As long as we have that time machine out we might as well go back a couple years and draft tom brady.

or maybe we could just keep stephen davis and not trade the best corner in the league for another back who doesn't fit the system.
aehs77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-17-2004, 11:33 PM   #15
Gmanc711
Thank You, Sean.
 
Gmanc711's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Gaithersburg, MD
Age: 39
Posts: 7,506
Quote:
Originally Posted by aehs77
As long as we have that time machine out we might as well go back a couple years and draft tom brady.

or maybe we could just keep stephen davis and not trade the best corner in the league for another back who doesn't fit the system.

Maybe the system needs to fit the running back, like it did today. They totaly changed some of the plays they used Portis on and it showed. They need to adapt the system to Portis like they did today and they will be successfull.
__________________
#21
Gmanc711 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:40 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.25349 seconds with 10 queries