Bradford still leads, Locker Clausen gain

PennSkinsFan · 12-01-2009, 03:28 PM

http://dcprosportsreport.com/2009/12/01/mock-munch-clausen-still-the-projected-top-pick.html

9 of the 21 mocks projecting a QB tot he Redskins project Sam Bradford. However, Jake Locker and Jimmy Clausen increase in their projections, while Tim Tebow falls.

3 mocks have the Redskins going DT. Huh? Really?

Eknox · 12-01-2009, 03:32 PM

We better not pick that stick Bradford, we can't protect him he'd be ground beef in the NFC Beast.

skinsfan69 · 12-01-2009, 04:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Eknox

We better not pick that stick Bradford, we can't protect him he'd be ground beef in the NFC Beast.

I agree. We don't need Bradford at all.

Big C · 12-01-2009, 03:37 PM

not gonna lie, even though we have various offensive needs, suh might be too good to pass up if he were available wherever we pick. he and haynesworth in the middle...they both require double teams. orakpo and carter would have a field day at the qb. we will see how things play out.

jsarno · 12-01-2009, 03:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Big C

not gonna lie, even though we have various offensive needs, suh might be too good to pass up if he were available wherever we pick. he and haynesworth in the middle...they both require double teams. orakpo and carter would have a field day at the qb. we will see how things play out.

Plus, if we are uncapped, we can get another QB via free agency.

SmootSmack · 12-01-2009, 03:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jsarno

Plus, if we are uncapped, we can get another QB via free agency.

Such as?

CRedskinsRule · 12-01-2009, 03:49 PM

Seriously, if we pick any Defensive player in the first 3 rounds(assuming we pick up some picks) I think Ashburn had better pull up the drawbridge and prepare for an armada of mobile signs, cuz EVERYONE knows what we ought to be picking!

SmootSmack · 12-01-2009, 03:53 PM

I really hope we don't draft any defensive players early, though I might make a small exception for Eric Berry. But even that won't thrill me

skinsfan69 · 12-01-2009, 04:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SmootSmack

I really hope we don't draft any defensive players early, though I might make a small exception for Eric Berry. But even that won't thrill me

Taylor Mays anyone???

mlmdub130 · 12-01-2009, 05:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by skinsfan69

Taylor Mays anyone???

that guy is a stud he knocked out two players with one hit last year

YouTube - Taylor Mays lays the wood on Penn State...

but we need oline

GTripp0012 · 12-01-2009, 05:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SmootSmack

I really hope we don't draft any defensive players early, though I might make a small exception for Eric Berry. But even that won't thrill me

Would you take Berry in the top 8 picks if Landry could be traded for a package including a second (between picks 40 and 55) and a sixth rounder?

Could the offensive issues be addressed with two second round picks?

SmootSmack · 12-01-2009, 05:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GTripp0012

Would you take Berry in the top 8 picks if Landry could be traded for a package including a second (between picks 40 and 55) and a sixth rounder?

Could the offensive issues be addressed with two second round picks?

Can we also maybe trade Rogers for a 3rd? And are we sticking with Campbell in this scenario...or re-signing Chase Daniel?

GTripp0012 · 12-01-2009, 05:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SmootSmack

Can we also maybe trade Rogers for a 3rd? And are we sticking with Campbell in this scenario...or re-signing Chase Daniel?

Well, in this scenario we can't necessarily get anything meaningful for those guys before the draft, so whether or not they are in our future plays, we still have Campbell or Rogers going into draft day on second round RFA tenders. The only opportunity would be to trade Landry for a 2nd+.

SmootSmack · 12-01-2009, 06:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GTripp0012

Well, in this scenario we can't necessarily get anything meaningful for those guys before the draft, so whether or not they are in our future plays, we still have Campbell or Rogers going into draft day on second round RFA tenders. The only opportunity would be to trade Landry for a 2nd+.

Eh...probably not. I really don't have a problem with Landry. Just that it seems Landry, Horton, and Doughty all pretty much play the same position-Strong Safety. And I'm not sold yet on Moore as a starting free safety. I think drafting someone like Berry doesn't really help matters. A guy like Allen out of South Florida in the 5th round might be another issue.

I would like to address our QB issue (whether that means drafting someone or extending Campbell), our OT issues, and our RB issue before we address the secondary.

53Fan · 12-01-2009, 04:14 PM

There are some "beasts" out there on defense. There is every year. DRAFT O-LINE!

12-01-2009, 03:28 PM	#1
PennSkinsFan Impact Rookie Join Date: Aug 2005 Age: 54 Posts: 752	Bradford still leads, Locker Clausen gain http://dcprosportsreport.com/2009/12/01/mock-munch-clausen-still-the-projected-top-pick.html 9 of the 21 mocks projecting a QB tot he Redskins project Sam Bradford. However, Jake Locker and Jimmy Clausen increase in their projections, while Tim Tebow falls. 3 mocks have the Redskins going DT. Huh? Really? __________________ DC Pro Sports Report - Home of the Internet's Largest NFL Mock Draft Database. Best Redskins Redskins discussion, theWarpath.net

12-01-2009, 03:32 PM	#2
Eknox Impact Rookie Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Flint,Mi Posts: 528	Re: Bradford still leads, Locker Clausen gain We better not pick that stick Bradford, we can't protect him he'd be ground beef in the NFC Beast.

12-01-2009, 03:37 PM	#4
Big C Mr. Brightside Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: Leesburg, VA Age: 38 Posts: 4,453	Re: Bradford still leads, Locker Clausen gain not gonna lie, even though we have various offensive needs, suh might be too good to pass up if he were available wherever we pick. he and haynesworth in the middle...they both require double teams. orakpo and carter would have a field day at the qb. we will see how things play out. __________________ "I don't care what nobody say I'm a be me, stay hood stay real, cause I'm out here grindin'" -Joe Gibbs

12-01-2009, 03:49 PM	#7
CRedskinsRule Living Legend Join Date: Aug 2008 Age: 57 Posts: 21,452	Re: Bradford still leads, Locker Clausen gain Seriously, if we pick any Defensive player in the first 3 rounds(assuming we pick up some picks) I think Ashburn had better pull up the drawbridge and prepare for an armada of mobile signs, cuz EVERYONE knows what we ought to be picking!

12-01-2009, 03:53 PM	#8
SmootSmack Uncle Phil Join Date: Feb 2004 Posts: 45,256	Re: Bradford still leads, Locker Clausen gain I really hope we don't draft any defensive players early, though I might make a small exception for Eric Berry. But even that won't thrill me __________________ You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You

12-01-2009, 04:14 PM	#15
53Fan Franchise Player Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: Kill Devil Hills, N.C. Posts: 7,570	Re: Bradford still leads, Locker Clausen gain There are some "beasts" out there on defense. There is every year. DRAFT O-LINE! __________________ Defense wins championships. Bring it!

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Bradford still leads, Locker Clausen gain

Locker Room Main Forum