|
Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
01-04-2010, 09:50 AM | #1 |
Special Teams
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 153
|
Cooley for Marshall?????
I know I know, I already brought it up in another thread. But how great would this trade be? Their TE Scheff is in the dog house as well as Marshall with MC Douche. I think they would jump at the chanced to grab Cooley for Marshall, allowing them to either trade their TE or cut him. Marshall would behave under shanny, we finnally get our Pro Bowl WR, while we Develop our 3rd yr guys who are showing alot of potential, Davis fills right in where cooley left. And we focus completly on our needs in the draft (OL!!!) Your thoughts?
__________________
“If you always do what you’ve always done, you’ll always get what you’ve always got.” ― Henry Ford |
Advertisements |
01-04-2010, 09:52 AM | #2 |
\m/
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,518
|
Re: Cooley for Marshall?????
Gotta love Skins fans, some are sick of the splashy moves, some can't wait for the next one.
|
01-04-2010, 09:53 AM | #3 |
MVP
Join Date: May 2004
Age: 46
Posts: 10,164
|
Re: Cooley for Marshall?????
That's a big time NFW.
|
01-04-2010, 10:06 AM | #4 |
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 7,766
|
Re: Cooley for Marshall?????
I'd really like to see what Shanahan would do with 2 pass catching TE's. Imagine Moss in the slot. Thomas and Kelly at #1 and #2, and Davis and Cooley going out for routes. Not to mention the availability for a RB to go out.
Plus we need OL, OL, OL. What I have read though is that (Rumor mill) Shanahan likes 1 pass catching TE and 1 blocking TE. Cooley and Davis are not blocking TE's so one might end up gone. Yoder is not that great as a blocking TE in my oppinion. I guess I could stomach losing Cooley if Shanahan felt he needed the WR. So long as they get their blocking TE. Again why not T.O. if you so hung up on a big WR? He's a FA. No trades. No draft picks. Plus Shanahan tried to get him while in Denver. |
01-04-2010, 10:09 AM | #5 |
The Starter
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 1,555
|
Re: Cooley for Marshall?????
That trade makes no sense for the Broncos. If they trade Marshall it will be for picks.
__________________
It has taken a long time, but I have finally realized that nothing I say about the Redskins will have any effect upon anything the Redskins do. |
01-04-2010, 10:23 AM | #6 |
Special Teams
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Midlothian, VA
Age: 45
Posts: 107
|
Re: Cooley for Marshall?????
Hell no!!! Having 2 tight ends like Cooley and Davis on the field at the same time will be great. We have young receivers that are just starting to contribute and with a lot less attitude than Marshall
|
01-04-2010, 10:29 AM | #7 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Leesburg, VA
Age: 60
Posts: 3,419
|
Re: Cooley for Marshall?????
I agree that Cooley and Davis on the field together will be a dynamic combo. With Devin Thomas and Malcolm Kelly starting to show promise, the last thing that I would want for Cooley is a diva WR setting a poor example for Kelly, Thomas, and Marko Mitchell.
|
01-04-2010, 10:34 AM | #8 |
Living Legend
Join Date: Aug 2008
Age: 57
Posts: 21,429
|
Re: Cooley for Marshall?????
Any talk of new WR's/TEs is just crazy. We need an oline, after that is addressed we need quality backups for the oline. After that is addressed, we need defensive back 7, and a qb for the future. Giving up depth at a critical position such as TE, just cuz we have 2 very good ones is crazy. Bringing in new WR's when ours have potentially untapped potential under a new coaching staff is just crazy.
Ah skins fans, craziness abounds! |
01-04-2010, 10:41 AM | #9 |
\m/
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,518
|
Re: Cooley for Marshall?????
Making a move like this would just stink of the same old, same old in Washington.
I'm hoping the big splashy moves will be a thing of the past now and our main focus will be on building through the draft. |
01-04-2010, 10:58 AM | #10 | |
Playmaker
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 4,712
|
Re: Cooley for Marshall?????
Quote:
__________________
Dolphins get good press for saving drowning humans.But we only hear about the swimmers theyve pushed ashore.You know who we havent heard from: all the people theyve pushed out to sea.Dolphins dont know what theyre doing-they just like pushing things. |
|
01-04-2010, 10:59 AM | #11 |
Special Teams
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: BillysBurg, Va.
Posts: 489
|
Re: Cooley for Marshall?????
Thats a really bad idea. The last thing we need this offseason is trading one of the best tight ends in the league for a reciever. That is the least of our concerns this offseason.
|
01-04-2010, 11:01 AM | #12 |
MVP
Join Date: May 2004
Age: 46
Posts: 10,164
|
Re: Cooley for Marshall?????
I think big splashy moves are fine...when they are for good players and it fits a need that can push you over the top. For example: The AH signing would have been absolutely perfect if it really was the final piece of the pie. Instead it was a continuation of the complete delusion that our FO has seemed to be in for the better part of the decade that our team was any better than average talent-wise.
|
01-04-2010, 11:02 AM | #13 | |
The Starter
Join Date: Jan 2006
Age: 35
Posts: 1,092
|
Re: Cooley for Marshall?????
Quote:
apparently this "oline" thing helps keep your qb upright and gives your running back holes to run through. Sort of like an engine in a car, it makes things work, but who needs that..... |
|
01-04-2010, 11:02 AM | #14 |
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: Cooley for Marshall?????
When Cooley was allegedly offered to the Broncos last year they didn't want him. Not sure why they would want him now. Trade doesn't make sense for either side.
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
01-04-2010, 11:24 AM | #15 |
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: PA
Age: 45
Posts: 17,460
|
Re: Cooley for Marshall?????
No way.
If we can really utilize Cooley and Davis, who can stop 2 Pro Bowl-caliber TEs? We have some good WRs anyways. If we lose ARE and play Marko, it's a solid core of 4 WRs, 3 of them very young.
__________________
Not sent from a Droid, iPhone, Blackberry or toaster |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|