Redskins Owners

skinsguy · 09-14-2005, 10:36 PM

Even though Jack Kent Cooke would be like 185 years old now (just joking but close...lol,) if JKC hadn't died and was still owner, do you guys think there would have been any major differences in success?

That Guy · 09-14-2005, 11:29 PM

i don't think so, there weren't any SBs after gibbs left...

SUNRA · 09-14-2005, 11:36 PM

JKC was cheap. John Riggins sat out because of money and Cooke would have run the Redskins organization similar to the Eagles. Which basically means very few players would play have a long career with the team. He was a character though. " I'm experiencing uncontrollable ectasy," when asked about the victory over Dallas in the NFC Championship.

Sociofan · 09-15-2005, 12:13 PM

Perhaps we could legitimately ask, "What if John Cooke had gotten the team as he should have?" What would be the state of the Redskins today?

Hijinx · 09-15-2005, 02:10 PM

The biggest difference is the Skins would not have gone though that period of time where they signed over the hill stars for more money than what they were worth.(ie Sanders) Under Cooke I do not believe the Skins would be leading the NFL in wasted cap money EVERY FREAKING YEAR.

RedskinRat · 09-15-2005, 02:15 PM

OK, everybody in the Time Machine, we're changing history!

Possibly interesting topic of conjecture, but not given the present dissent in the ranks. Who's to say that we woulddn't be looking at The 'Washington Bureaucrats' instead of our beloved Redskins.

So many things could have been different, once you get started you'll be up all hours.

BrudLee · 09-15-2005, 02:16 PM

I dispute that ownership under John Kent Cooke would be necessarily better. The person closest to the situation who knew him best didn't have a whole lot of faith in him, so I don't know why we should.

I'm referring, of course, to his father.

celts32 · 09-15-2005, 02:19 PM

I believe it would be better. The redskins were one of the most respected organizations in football under big Jack. Perhaps Charley C would still be running the show if Jack were still around. Snyder has already admitted that getting rid of Charley was a big mistake.

skinsguy · 09-15-2005, 02:21 PM

I know I've asked this before, but is Beathard retired??

celts32 · 09-15-2005, 05:27 PM

Yes, he is retired.

Skins fan 44 · 09-15-2005, 06:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by celts32

Perhaps Charley C would still be running the show if Jack were still around. Snyder has already admitted that getting rid of Charley was a big mistake.

Everyone wanted him gone too. Too many bad draft picks such as Shuler and Westbrook. Then there was the loosing seasons that Snyder did not like something we were not used to back then.

09-14-2005, 10:36 PM	#1
skinsguy Pro Bowl Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Greensboro, North Carolina Posts: 6,766	Redskins Owners Even though Jack Kent Cooke would be like 185 years old now (just joking but close...lol,) if JKC hadn't died and was still owner, do you guys think there would have been any major differences in success? __________________ "Fire Up That Diesel!"

09-14-2005, 11:29 PM	#2
That Guy Living Legend Join Date: Jun 2004 Location: VA Age: 42 Posts: 17,553	Re: Redskins Owners i don't think so, there weren't any SBs after gibbs left...

09-14-2005, 11:36 PM	#3
SUNRA The Starter Join Date: Mar 2004 Posts: 1,680	Re: Redskins Owners JKC was cheap. John Riggins sat out because of money and Cooke would have run the Redskins organization similar to the Eagles. Which basically means very few players would play have a long career with the team. He was a character though. " I'm experiencing uncontrollable ectasy," when asked about the victory over Dallas in the NFC Championship. __________________ Redskins Member since 1970

09-15-2005, 12:13 PM	#4
Sociofan Special Teams Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: Gainesville, VA Age: 59 Posts: 380	Re: Redskins Owners Perhaps we could legitimately ask, "What if John Cooke had gotten the team as he should have?" What would be the state of the Redskins today?

09-15-2005, 02:10 PM	#5
Hijinx The Starter Join Date: Apr 2005 Age: 49 Posts: 1,961	Re: Redskins Owners The biggest difference is the Skins would not have gone though that period of time where they signed over the hill stars for more money than what they were worth.(ie Sanders) Under Cooke I do not believe the Skins would be leading the NFL in wasted cap money EVERY FREAKING YEAR. __________________ This is my signature, there are many like it, but this one is mine.

09-15-2005, 02:15 PM	#6
RedskinRat Franchise Player Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: I'm in LA, trick! Posts: 8,700	Re: Redskins Owners OK, everybody in the Time Machine, we're changing history! Possibly interesting topic of conjecture, but not given the present dissent in the ranks. Who's to say that we woulddn't be looking at The 'Washington Bureaucrats' instead of our beloved Redskins. So many things could have been different, once you get started you'll be up all hours.

09-15-2005, 02:16 PM	#7
BrudLee Playmaker Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Rehoboth Beach, DE Posts: 3,494	Re: Redskins Owners I dispute that ownership under John Kent Cooke would be necessarily better. The person closest to the situation who knew him best didn't have a whole lot of faith in him, so I don't know why we should. I'm referring, of course, to his father. __________________ There's nowhere to go but up. Or down. I guess we could stay where we are, too.

09-15-2005, 02:19 PM	#8
celts32 Playmaker Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Hackettstown NJ Age: 53 Posts: 2,665	Re: Redskins Owners I believe it would be better. The redskins were one of the most respected organizations in football under big Jack. Perhaps Charley C would still be running the show if Jack were still around. Snyder has already admitted that getting rid of Charley was a big mistake. __________________ Section 116 Row 19 “Goal line, goal line. I-left, tight wing, 70 chip on white.” www.facebook.com/HackettstownBeerClub

09-15-2005, 02:21 PM	#9
skinsguy Pro Bowl Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Greensboro, North Carolina Posts: 6,766	Re: Redskins Owners I know I've asked this before, but is Beathard retired?? __________________ "Fire Up That Diesel!"

09-15-2005, 05:27 PM	#10
celts32 Playmaker Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Hackettstown NJ Age: 53 Posts: 2,665	Re: Redskins Owners Yes, he is retired. __________________ Section 116 Row 19 “Goal line, goal line. I-left, tight wing, 70 chip on white.” www.facebook.com/HackettstownBeerClub

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Redskins Owners

Locker Room Main Forum