|
Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
09-27-2005, 06:14 AM | #1 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Ridgway, PA
Age: 46
Posts: 2,519
|
Wide Receivers...
As many of us here, I am glad that we now have a down field threat in Mr. Moss. I, also, like other question if Brunell and Moss can hook up like that on somewhat of a habitual basis.
I think that we need to have either Patten or Jacobs(if he is healthy) to step up. If they can not then teams will still stack the box to take Portis out of the game and double up on Moss knowing that our other receivers are not going to hurt them deep... I hope this sunday that Patten or Jacobs catch a few deep balls just to solidify that our receivers will now have to be accounted for when Deffense coordinators are game planning for us...
__________________
"I am the best at what I do, and what I do isn't very nice" - Sean Taylor |
Advertisements |
09-27-2005, 07:14 AM | #2 |
The Starter
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Charlottesville, VA
Age: 48
Posts: 1,501
|
Re: Wide Receivers...
Cooley, Patten, Jacobs and Thrash all need to become threats in their own rights. Cooley, in particular, is the key to opening things up in the passing game. I'd also like to see Portis catching more passes out of the backfield.
__________________
Joe Crisp covered Redskins camps for TheWarpath.net for three years. He also covered Redskins Training Camp 2005 for The Daily Progress. |
09-27-2005, 07:16 AM | #3 |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Washington, DC
Age: 36
Posts: 5,688
|
Re: Wide Receivers...
If they double moss it will open stuff up underneath. It is just that they might stack the box and worry just about moss after that, but it is hard to double a player, it takes away from a defense. If moss is doubled then Patten and Taylor will get more shots. Which will give us enough respect that teams might actually back off the line so portis can get a couple easy yards,
|
09-27-2005, 08:16 AM | #4 |
^21^
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Richmond, Virginia
Age: 52
Posts: 1,630
|
Re: Wide Receivers...
I'm happy with Moss being the only 'threat' going into wk4. Gibbs has seen the promised land. Ofcourse we'll run Portis, but I'll take dumps to Thrash and Cooley and slants to Patten over anyone being considered a 'threat'. Double team Moss and our smart 35 yr old will find the open guy. Don't forget that Portis becomes much more of a passing threat since Moss shined against the Cowboys. As in poker anything is possible with the Redskins and atleat until now Gibbs holds the cards. He's smarter than most think...
Redskins roll Seahawks 24-10! I'm a season tick holder and won't be in town for the game. Please make sure its loud! Be pissed when I see ya'll again if we lose at home!
__________________
^21^ |
09-27-2005, 10:04 AM | #5 |
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Age: 54
Posts: 5,006
|
Re: Wide Receivers...
I don't think we need 70 yard strikes to get the safties out of the box, I think about 3 plays of 20-25 yds out of the passing game will suffice.. I think Brunell will be able to get out of the pocket and make some plays in the passing game down the field to Cooley and Royal against Seattle that he wasn't able to do against Dallas because of the Cowboys speed and discipline.. Effectiveness down the field will do the trick, but at least a willingness to go down the field should open things up for Portis..
__________________
Paintrain's Redskins Fandom 1981-2014 I'm not dead but this team is dead to me...but now that McCloughan is here they may have new life! Jay Gruden = Zorny McSpurrier Kirk Cousins = Next Grossman |
09-27-2005, 10:11 AM | #6 |
Living Legend
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: chesapeake, va
Age: 60
Posts: 15,817
|
Re: Wide Receivers...
While were on the subject of WR's. It great to have Thrash back making every catch that comes his way. I can't remember the last time that Thrash droped a ball. I know he will never be a 1,000 yard WR but he never seems to miss a ball that should be catch.
|
09-27-2005, 10:37 AM | #7 | |
The Starter
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,680
|
Re: Wide Receivers...
Quote:
__________________
Redskins Member since 1970 |
|
09-27-2005, 11:07 AM | #8 | |
Quietly Dominating the East
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Naples, Florida
Posts: 10,675
|
Re: Wide Receivers...
Quote:
|
|
09-27-2005, 12:46 PM | #9 | |
The Starter
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Age: 58
Posts: 1,176
|
Re: Wide Receivers...
Quote:
|
|
09-27-2005, 01:02 PM | #10 |
I like big (_|_)s.
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Lexington, Virginia
Age: 43
Posts: 19,225
|
Re: Wide Receivers...
Speaking of Jacobs, who else was happy to see him back on the field finally?
__________________
Regret nothing. At one time it was exactly what you wanted. |
09-27-2005, 01:08 PM | #11 | |
Fight for old DC!
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Aldie, VA
Age: 46
Posts: 4,101
|
Re: Wide Receivers...
Quote:
I am. I would really like to see how he can perform when he's 100%. Hopefully he'll get some more balls thrown his way soon. He needs to step up. |
|
09-27-2005, 02:10 PM | #12 |
I like big (_|_)s.
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Lexington, Virginia
Age: 43
Posts: 19,225
|
Re: Wide Receivers...
I have to though, he made about 4-5 moves trying to get an extra half a yard when he caught a pass against Dallas.
I think the kid has some moves, I just want to start seeing them.
__________________
Regret nothing. At one time it was exactly what you wanted. |
09-27-2005, 03:35 PM | #13 |
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Richmond, VA
Age: 41
Posts: 890
|
Re: Wide Receivers...
cooley!!!
|
09-27-2005, 04:46 PM | #14 |
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: nyc
Age: 48
Posts: 2,631
|
Re: Wide Receivers...
how can everybody forget Gibb's answer to the lack of big, physical possession red zone threat?
WR #5 Sean Taylor.
__________________
a fan. not a cheerleader. |
09-27-2005, 08:35 PM | #15 | |
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 45
Posts: 8,317
|
Re: Wide Receivers...
Quote:
DISCLAIMER: I don't want to rehash the Brunell-Ramsey debate, but does anyone think that Brunell hasn't developed the chemistry with Cooley that Ramsey had? Ramsey looked to Cooley an awful lot and it seems like Cooley has been pretty quiet. Maybe things will turn around after a few weeks, but I'd like to see Cooley more involved in the offense's short-intermediate passing attack. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|