|
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
12-21-2005, 06:42 PM
|
#1 |
|
Hug Anne Spyder
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 20,468
|
Pro Bowl Bound - Samuels, Moss
http://www.redskins.com/news/newsDetail.jsp?id=13826
how the **** does chris cooley make first alternate? all i've been hearing is how cooley led in voting for nfc fullbacks. I'm happy that Moss is going, but i think it's stupid that Marcus Washington isn't, he's having a better season than last year too. I really do not think Samuels deserves to go. He has been dominated by some of the best defensive ends we have faced. Cough Jared Allen Cough. And what really pisses me off is Michael Vick. He has been horrible this season, yet he makes it to the Pro Bowl? that is complete bullshit, it just shows that some fans don't care about who's actually doing well during the season, if you're a big name having a mediocre season you still have an excellent shot. |
|
|
| Advertisements |
|
12-21-2005, 06:46 PM
|
#2 |
|
Special Teams
Join Date: May 2004
Location: philippines
Age: 51
Posts: 184
|
Re: Pro Bowl Bound - Samuels, Moss
voting sucks, they should include
1. cooley 2. griffin 3. taylor roy williams was selected ahead of taylor this is shit |
|
|
|
|
12-21-2005, 06:47 PM
|
#3 |
|
Hug Anne Spyder
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 20,468
|
Re: Pro Bowl Bound - Samuels, Moss
griffin wouldn't make it based on the fact that he's been injured part of the season. i do think marcus washington and sean taylor should've been on there.
|
|
|
|
|
12-21-2005, 07:14 PM
|
#4 |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 1,674
|
Re: Pro Bowl Bound - Samuels, Moss
cooley won the voting, but that only counts as 1/3 of the voting...he didnt win because the coaches and players vote and u know they would want a real fullback in there
|
|
|
|
|
12-21-2005, 07:21 PM
|
#5 | |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: UK
Age: 58
Posts: 2,441
|
Re: Pro Bowl Bound - Samuels, Moss
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
12-21-2005, 07:47 PM
|
#6 |
|
MVP
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: lancaster,pa
Age: 63
Posts: 10,672
|
Re: Pro Bowl Bound - Samuels, Moss
williams wins the popularity contest big deal we have sean taylor on our side and thats all that matters
|
|
|
|
|
12-21-2005, 08:05 PM
|
#7 |
|
Special Teams
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Upper Marlboro, MD/Greensboro, NC
Age: 37
Posts: 482
|
Re: Pro Bowl Bound - Samuels, Moss
I think that Mark Brunell has fewer INT's than all of the QB's selected to the Pro Bowl, NFC & AFC. He is the reason that Moss is making his first trip. It is clear that the Pro Bowl is a popularity contest when Michael Vick goes after that terrible season.
Cooley probably didn't make it because no one is sure what position he plays because of Joe Gibbs "old school" offense. I think that Mike Sellers should have at least been a first alternate. He does our dirty work and is no stranger to the endzone. He is the type of player that you appreciate and his roll in an offense is often overlooked. Our defense doesn't have anyone making the trip because of all the packages that Gregg Williams uses. players don't get as many reps as others in the league. The Pro Bowl is overrated and we will see how this season turns out with our "under achieving" players. |
|
|
|
|
12-21-2005, 08:10 PM
|
#8 | |
|
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Washington, DC
Age: 36
Posts: 5,688
|
Re: Pro Bowl Bound - Samuels, Moss
Quote:
    :headbange   :cheeky-sm    :headbange  :headbange   :headbange
|
|
|
|
|
|
12-21-2005, 08:48 PM
|
#9 |
|
Hug Anne Spyder
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 20,468
|
Re: Pro Bowl Bound - Samuels, Moss
i think kyle vanden bosch should've gone. he's having a monster season too. I hope we can sign him after his contract is up this year.
|
|
|
|
|
12-21-2005, 09:35 PM
|
#10 |
|
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 519
|
Re: Pro Bowl Bound - Samuels, Moss
I heard Parcells voted everyday for Roy Williams...
__________________
SAY HELLO TO THE BAD GUY........ |
|
|
|
|
12-21-2005, 10:42 PM
|
#11 |
|
MVP
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: lancaster,pa
Age: 63
Posts: 10,672
|
Re: Pro Bowl Bound - Samuels, Moss
wewhite what team do you root for?just wondering
|
|
|
|
|
12-21-2005, 11:27 PM
|
#12 | |
|
JUST LIVIN
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: houston,tx
Age: 62
Posts: 4,909
|
Re: Pro Bowl Bound - Samuels, Moss
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
12-22-2005, 12:37 AM
|
#13 |
|
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: Pro Bowl Bound - Samuels, Moss
The argument for Vick is that the team is nothing without him and how he does so much with so little to work with. So if that's the reason why he was chosen over someone (Brunell) who statistically is having a much better reason and, unlike Vick, has his team in the playoffs right now then why do Dunn (over Portis) and Crumpler (over Cooley) get Pro Bowl nods as well? I thought Vick was some miracle worker working with scrubs.
And then how does Keith Brooking get the nod over Marcus Washington?! Stupid Falcons. All I know is both the Redskins and the Falcons had huge games this past Sunday with major playoff implications. One team's "Pro Bowlers" responded with a resounding victory. The other team's folded into the fetal position
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
|
|
|
|
12-22-2005, 12:42 AM
|
#14 |
|
I like big (_|_)s.
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Lexington, Virginia
Age: 43
Posts: 19,225
|
Re: Pro Bowl Bound - Samuels, Moss
Well put TAFKAS.
__________________
Regret nothing. At one time it was exactly what you wanted. |
|
|
|
|
12-22-2005, 05:16 AM
|
#15 | |
|
Impact Rookie
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 519
|
Re: Pro Bowl Bound - Samuels, Moss
Quote:
__________________
SAY HELLO TO THE BAD GUY........ |
|
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Linear Mode
