Draft wrap-up 2013

[HailGreen28]

Entertaining pics of supposed team needs. I know this is late, but the basic position ranking and couple blurbs are interesting. (Dunno how accurate)
2013 NFL Draft team needs - SBNation.com

[RGIII]

Waab

[Monkeydad]

Funny picture for the Eagles. Love how the whole offensive line needs help.

Here's ours. Looks like we fixed what we needed to. How the hell do they call Trent Williams "questionable"? I'd also say our ILBs, DEs and one WR should be "good to go". This thing is severely flawed.



Love seeing red on the offensive line for Dallas...are they going to play their 1st-round Center with 3rd-round talent at one of these guard spots? Also interesting how the other teams have their head coach pictured on the bottom and Dallas gets a Jerry Jones mugshot.

[skinsfaninok]

They said we need a LT? That already lost it for me. Idiots

[CRedskinsRule]

LT and 1 WR spot at least should be good to go on ours. Not sure why Garcon would be considered a questionable, could easily have both WR spots as good to go, but I can understand that no one player really rises above the pack for the second spot. Same with DE, again, we may not have elite talent there, but to say it's questionable seems a bit lame as well.

[donofriose]

Originally Posted by CRedskinsRule

LT and 1 WR spot at least should be good to go on ours. Not sure why Garcon would be considered a questionable, could easily have both WR spots as good to go, but I can understand that no one player really rises above the pack for the second spot. Same with DE, again, we may not have elite talent there, but to say it's questionable seems a bit lame as well.

I think they were just saying a DE in general, a WR in a general and a tackle in general. Not left or right. I thought the same thing but then I went to the lions page and checked the lions and it said WR questionable. So I'm assuming they don't mean Calvin Johnson and mean the lions could just improve at the receiver position.
And if that's what they mean then they would be right. Redskins could improve the dline, the receiving core and obviously at the tackle positions.

[NC_Skins]

Originally Posted by donofriose

I think they were just saying a DE in general, a WR in a general and a tackle in general. Not left or right. I thought the same thing but then I went to the lions page and checked the lions and it said WR questionable. So I'm assuming they don't mean Calvin Johnson and mean the lions could just improve at the receiver position.
And if that's what they mean then they would be right. Redskins could improve the dline, the receiving core and obviously at the tackle positions.

This.

They aren't denoting the side of the position in need, just the position itself. It would have been nice if they expanded and even noted the sides that need help.

[CultBrennan59]

This was also published BEFORE the draft, not after.

[Monkeydad]

Originally Posted by CultBrennan59

This was also published BEFORE the draft, not after.

Trent was elite before the draft too.

[CultBrennan59]

Originally Posted by Monkeydad

Trent was elite before the draft too.

And if you read the posts above mine, you would see that they are referring to the tackle position in general, not specifically the LT.

[That Guy]

Originally Posted by CultBrennan59

And if you read the posts above mine, you would see that they are referring to the tackle position in general, not specifically the LT.

and the pic says we need two OTs, so, that's the RT and the what? center tackle?

they're not talking about depth. so that means garcon and trent are questionable, which makes that pic-chart stupid.

[CultBrennan59]

Originally Posted by That Guy

and the pic says we need two OTs, so, that's the RT and the what? center tackle?

they're not talking about depth. so that means garcon and trent are questionable, which makes that pic-chart stupid.

They're are saying OT, not LT.

A lot of publications will do this because in their computers when they tell the computers to highlight OT, it highlights OT and since there are 2 OTs on the field at the time it highlights them both.
2013 NFL Draft team needs: Seattle Seahawks - SBNation.com
Look at Seattles situation which is similar to ours; they have a great LT but no RT.

The best LT in the NFL is Duane Brown of Houston, heres what Houstons chart. 2013 NFL Draft team needs: Houston Texans - SBNation.com

They need help there as well. Is it stupid that they can't just highlight one spot instead of two? Yeah, but they aren't saying or trying to say that Trents bad.

[HailGreen28]

Originally Posted by That Guy

and the pic says we need two OTs, so, that's the RT and the what? center tackle?

they're not talking about depth. so that means garcon and trent are questionable, which makes that pic-chart stupid.

Well, our RTs have been turnstiles against the pass rush, and Garcon couldn't stay healthy last season (missed 6 games and played hurt others)....

Thought the charts were entertaining even if not wholly accurate. Some of the coaches pics are hilarious. Still interested in discrepancies of the other teams charts.

[ethat001]

Why did Thomas and Rambo fall so far?


I"m sure it has been discussed somewhere over the past 1-2 weeks, but... everyone is saying they could start, both were supposed to have been drafted 2-3 rounds higher, but... they weren't. I realize the drugs with Rambo, but just wanted to see what everyone else was thinking by passing them up. A lot of teams passed on these guys round after round, and picked up much lower ranked safeties ahead of them. If we get "steals", I'd love it, but makes me wonder.


Player - Projected Round - Actual Round
Vaccaro - 1 ===> 1 (15)
Eric Reid - 1-2 ===> 1 (18)
Matt Elam - 1-2 ===> 1 (32)
Cyprien - 1-2 ===> 2 (33)
Swearninger - 2-3 ===> 2 (57)
TJ McDonald - 3-4 ===> 3 (71)
JJ Wilcox - 3 ===> 3 (80)
S.Williams - 3-4 ===> 3 (84)
D.Harmon NA ===> 3 (91)
D.Williams 5 ===> 4 (105)
S.Thomas 3-4 ===> 4 (111)
P. Thomas - 2-3 ===> 4 (119)
E.Wolff 6 ===> 5 (136)
J.Meeks ===> 5 (143)
C.Taylor 7 ===> 5 (152)
J.Evans 4 ===> 6 (169)
J.Slaughter ===> 6(175)
B.Rambo 3-4 ===> 6 (191)

[mbedner3420]

Originally Posted by ethat001

Why did Thomas and Rambo fall so far?


I"m sure it has been discussed somewhere over the past 1-2 weeks, but... everyone is saying they could start, both were supposed to have been drafted 2-3 rounds higher, but... they weren't. I realize the drugs with Rambo, but just wanted to see what everyone else was thinking by passing them up. A lot of teams passed on these guys round after round, and picked up much lower ranked safeties ahead of them. If we get "steals", I'd love it, but makes me wonder.


Player - Projected Round - Actual Round
Vaccaro - 1 ===> 1 (15)
Eric Reid - 1-2 ===> 1 (18)
Matt Elam - 1-2 ===> 1 (32)
Cyprien - 1-2 ===> 2 (33)
Swearninger - 2-3 ===> 2 (57)
TJ McDonald - 3-4 ===> 3 (71)
JJ Wilcox - 3 ===> 3 (80)
S.Williams - 3-4 ===> 3 (84)
D.Harmon NA ===> 3 (91)
D.Williams 5 ===> 4 (105)
S.Thomas 3-4 ===> 4 (111)
P. Thomas - 2-3 ===> 4 (119)
E.Wolff 6 ===> 5 (136)
J.Meeks ===> 5 (143)
C.Taylor 7 ===> 5 (152)
J.Evans 4 ===> 6 (169)
J.Slaughter ===> 6(175)
B.Rambo 3-4 ===> 6 (191)

It could very well come down to scheme fit in all honesty.