Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Skins vs Bears postgame

Locker Room Main Forum


View Poll Results: Skins over Bears: game ball time
RG3 20 29.85%
Helu 16 23.88%
Reed 27 40.30%
Orakpo 2 2.99%
Other 2 2.99%
Voters: 67. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-21-2013, 12:35 PM   #1
scowan
The Starter
 
scowan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: KY
Age: 57
Posts: 1,559
Re: Skins vs Bears postgame

Quote:
Originally Posted by RFKRat View Post
It's not just the special teams. The defense is still a joke. When Josh McCown of all people can come in and move the ball at will, you have problems. It's a sickening feeling that even with :45 left after the go-ahead TD, the Bears still had a chance to win the game.

I think some perspective is in order too. I know people hate realists but this is still a bad football team. The local media is drooling on about "progress" but really has there been much? Is the team, and Griffin "better" or are they taking advantage?

If Oakland has Pryor in the lineup it's not out of order to say that the Redskins probably don't win that game...Flynn was terrible but the game was still close. In Dallas, people point out "progress" even though it was a two-TD loss. Dallas was missing their RB and had a patchwork defensive line, including losing their Pro Bowl star Ware early in the game. Yet the media here and most fans ignore that and go on about how the offense is "back". Yet even Dallas's backups were able to pressure the Redskins and hold them to 16 points overall. That's progress?

Then yesterday. Don't even mention Cutler going down, cause McCown (an awful QB over the last few years) came in and torched the Redskins. But on defense the Bears were already injury-riddled..losing key members Helton and Jennings earlier in the year and were overall like 28th in the league. One of the announcers even jokingly said the Bears had some guys on the line who were meat-packers a couple weeks ago. Then they lost Briggs and Tillman etc for extended time. So yeah, the offense looked great against one of the worst and most injury-riddled defenses in the league.

That's a good gauge that the offense is "back"? The Redskins were at home, had all the advantages (that onside kick was not offsides) and still barely scraped out a win. This is still like a 6-10 team at best. Yeah it was a win but I can't see how anyone is really that optimistic about it.
RFKRat, everything you have written here is true, but it was also mentioned in one of the Washington Post blogs about how it seems like the Redskins have been "knocking out" key members of the other team almost every week. Yesterday it was Cutler. Before that it was McFadden, then Eddie Lacy, then Demarco Murray. Heck they even knocked out LeVeon Bell in the preseason and it took him around 6 weeks to come back. Fate, Fortune, who knows, but you can only play the guys facing you and all teams have injuries that make them less than full strength. Heck, the Skins were missing a 100% RGIII and a Jenkins, and a Rob Jackson the first 4 weeks. Wins are Wins and while I have every reason to expect the Skins to get crushed in Denver next week, stranger things have happened. The Colts are a good team but I didn't see them beating the Broncos last night and they did.

The Redskins are improving in some areas and not in others, but they were 3-6 at one point last year and after 9 games this year I will exect them to be better than that.
scowan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-2013, 01:44 PM   #2
firstdown
Living Legend
 
firstdown's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: chesapeake, va
Age: 62
Posts: 15,817
Re: Skins vs Bears postgame

Quote:
Originally Posted by RFKRat View Post
It's not just the special teams. The defense is still a joke. When Josh McCown of all people can come in and move the ball at will, you have problems. It's a sickening feeling that even with :45 left after the go-ahead TD, the Bears still had a chance to win the game.

I think some perspective is in order too. I know people hate realists but this is still a bad football team. The local media is drooling on about "progress" but really has there been much? Is the team, and Griffin "better" or are they taking advantage?

If Oakland has Pryor in the lineup it's not out of order to say that the Redskins probably don't win that game...Flynn was terrible but the game was still close. In Dallas, people point out "progress" even though it was a two-TD loss. Dallas was missing their RB and had a patchwork defensive line, including losing their Pro Bowl star Ware early in the game. Yet the media here and most fans ignore that and go on about how the offense is "back". Yet even Dallas's backups were able to pressure the Redskins and hold them to 16 points overall. That's progress?

Then yesterday. Don't even mention Cutler going down, cause McCown (an awful QB over the last few years) came in and torched the Redskins. But on defense the Bears were already injury-riddled..losing key members Helton and Jennings earlier in the year and were overall like 28th in the league. One of the announcers even jokingly said the Bears had some guys on the line who were meat-packers a couple weeks ago. Then they lost Briggs and Tillman etc for extended time. So yeah, the offense looked great against one of the worst and most injury-riddled defenses in the league.

That's a good gauge that the offense is "back"? The Redskins were at home, had all the advantages (that onside kick was not offsides) and still barely scraped out a win. This is still like a 6-10 team at best. Yeah it was a win but I can't see how anyone is really that optimistic about it.
The Dallas game they had two very short fields to defend bause of a kick return and RGIII's fumble. We also gave up another specials teams score. Take those away and the D would have won that game for us. You also have your games mixed up it was the Dallas game they joked about having players that were working as meat packers.

Also the onside kick was offsides and the announcers also said the same thing. I just love how people talk about all the could have been or players missing like its is the excuse of why a team won. No names and patch work teams when all the time in the NFL and its not surprising.
firstdown is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-2013, 02:10 PM   #3
skinsfan69
Living Legend
 
skinsfan69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 17,643
Re: Skins vs Bears postgame

Quote:
Originally Posted by RFKRat View Post
It's not just the special teams. The defense is still a joke. When Josh McCown of all people can come in and move the ball at will, you have problems. It's a sickening feeling that even with :45 left after the go-ahead TD, the Bears still had a chance to win the game.

I think some perspective is in order too. I know people hate realists but this is still a bad football team. The local media is drooling on about "progress" but really has there been much? Is the team, and Griffin "better" or are they taking advantage?

If Oakland has Pryor in the lineup it's not out of order to say that the Redskins probably don't win that game...Flynn was terrible but the game was still close. In Dallas, people point out "progress" even though it was a two-TD loss. Dallas was missing their RB and had a patchwork defensive line, including losing their Pro Bowl star Ware early in the game. Yet the media here and most fans ignore that and go on about how the offense is "back". Yet even Dallas's backups were able to pressure the Redskins and hold them to 16 points overall. That's progress?

Then yesterday. Don't even mention Cutler going down, cause McCown (an awful QB over the last few years) came in and torched the Redskins. But on defense the Bears were already injury-riddled..losing key members Helton and Jennings earlier in the year and were overall like 28th in the league. One of the announcers even jokingly said the Bears had some guys on the line who were meat-packers a couple weeks ago. Then they lost Briggs and Tillman etc for extended time. So yeah, the offense looked great against one of the worst and most injury-riddled defenses in the league.

That's a good gauge that the offense is "back"? The Redskins were at home, had all the advantages (that onside kick was not offsides) and still barely scraped out a win. This is still like a 6-10 team at best. Yeah it was a win but I can't see how anyone is really that optimistic about it.
Can't really disagree with anything you've said. But it today's NFL, every single team has issues. I think every single win we get this year won't be a "complete" win....where all three phases click. I'm not losing perspective but that was a great game. 500+ yards and 38 points by the offense, RG3 played his best game, we have an emerging star at TE, Morris and Helu, DHall is playing some of his best ball as a pro...lot's of positives yesterday!

Last edited by skinsfan69; 10-21-2013 at 02:50 PM.
skinsfan69 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-2013, 03:34 PM   #4
Lotus
Fire Bruce NOW
 
Lotus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Hattiesburg, MS
Posts: 11,434
Re: Skins vs Bears postgame

Quote:
Originally Posted by skinsfan69 View Post
Can't really disagree with anything you've said. But it today's NFL, every single team has issues. I think every single win we get this year won't be a "complete" win....where all three phases click. I'm not losing perspective but that was a great game. 500+ yards and 38 points by the offense, RG3 played his best game, we have an emerging star at TE, Morris and Helu, DHall is playing some of his best ball as a pro...lot's of positives yesterday!
Well put. Our team is built to win high scoring games and that's what we did. We all should be happy.
__________________
Bruce Allen when in charge alone: 4-12 (.250)
Bruce Allen's overall Redskins record : 28-52 (.350)
Vinny Cerrato's record when in charge alone: 52-65 (.444)
Vinny's overall Redskins record: 62-82 (.430)
We won more with Vinny
Lotus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-2013, 12:25 PM   #5
MTK
Hail Raiser
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 53
Posts: 100,097
Re: Skins vs Bears postgame

It's all perspective I guess. People see what they want to see.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-2013, 12:38 PM   #6
Chico23231
Warpath Hall of Fame
 
Chico23231's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 35,307
Re: Skins vs Bears postgame

wins are tough to come by in this league, lets enjoy this one.

Im not understanding why people keep bringing up if Pryor woulda played we woulda loss. I f*cking forgot Pryor is on the same tier as Luck, untouchable apparently.
__________________
My pronouns: King/Your ruler

He Gets Us
Chico23231 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-2013, 01:19 PM   #7
12thMan
MVP
 
12thMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: washington, D.C.
Posts: 11,460
Re: Skins vs Bears postgame

I think if we can get Rak in Peyton's face, we'll have a shot at beating the Broncos. I really feel he's the missing piece of this defense. We need that guy to be dominant.
12thMan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-2013, 01:32 PM   #8
Lotus
Fire Bruce NOW
 
Lotus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Hattiesburg, MS
Posts: 11,434
Re: Skins vs Bears postgame

Quote:
Originally Posted by 12thMan View Post
I think if we can get Rak in Peyton's face, we'll have a shot at beating the Broncos. I really feel he's the missing piece of this defense. We need that guy to be dominant.
I agree. The Colts limited Manning by playing solid man-to-man with 7 guys and getting strong pressure off of the edges with 4 rushers. We can replicate that formula. If Rak and Kerrigan have good days, we have a shot at slowing Manning down.
__________________
Bruce Allen when in charge alone: 4-12 (.250)
Bruce Allen's overall Redskins record : 28-52 (.350)
Vinny Cerrato's record when in charge alone: 52-65 (.444)
Vinny's overall Redskins record: 62-82 (.430)
We won more with Vinny
Lotus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-2013, 01:32 PM   #9
firstdown
Living Legend
 
firstdown's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: chesapeake, va
Age: 62
Posts: 15,817
Re: Skins vs Bears postgame

Quote:
Originally Posted by 12thMan View Post
I think if we can get Rak in Peyton's face, we'll have a shot at beating the Broncos. I really feel he's the missing piece of this defense. We need that guy to be dominant.

I think we would have a better shot of having Kerrigan get preasure on Manning.
firstdown is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-2013, 01:35 PM   #10
Chico23231
Warpath Hall of Fame
 
Chico23231's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 35,307
Re: Skins vs Bears postgame

Pressure on the QB is a must in order for us to win. Blitzing QB sparked our run last year. You cant let Manning sit back there and scan the field, especially with their Oline injuries.
__________________
My pronouns: King/Your ruler

He Gets Us
Chico23231 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-2013, 02:20 PM   #11
htownskinfan
JUST LIVIN
 
htownskinfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: houston,tx
Age: 64
Posts: 4,941
Re: Skins vs Bears postgame

As I had posted earlier I fast forwarded a lot thru game.I went back and watched the last drive this morning without the ff.
As much as I've critized shannys for clock management I have to give him{them?}credit for the last drive.They didnt come out and panic because they were behind.There was plenty of time to score and they mixed in the runs and passes well.
There were some calls earlier in the game I had problems with,a couple of 3rd and 1s but the last drive was good.

Also RG3 looked pretty damn good on the last drive.Converted 2 big 3rd downs.The first one with the rollout I thought for sure was going to fail.He was running out of sideline and managed to squeeze the ball into Garcon who didnt drop it.
The 2nd 3rd down was clutch also.It shouldnt have been a 3rd down if Moss wouldnt have dropped that perfectly thrown ball that hit him dead center in the chest.And I dont believe it was knocked out,looked like the ball had already floated to his shoes by the time he was hit.Got to hold onto the ball in critical situations like that
__________________
Make The Redskins Great Again
htownskinfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-2013, 02:43 PM   #12
GTripp0012
Living Legend
 
GTripp0012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 38
Posts: 15,994
Re: Skins vs Bears postgame

The comment I wanted to make after the game was that: while it was fun to take over a game on offense, finally, and put up 45 points (38 on offense), I'm pretty sure we won't face a defense as depleted as that Bears defense that was down Briggs and Tillman at the end of the game.

But then I looked at the schedule. And there could be a lot more games like that this season. Lots of Giants, Eagles, Chargers, and Falcons the rest of the way. Still probably won't see a ton of quarters like that fourth against the Bears' scrubs, but something close to that isn't out of the question.

The running game, finally, is back. Perhaps for good. It's not just Morris-until-the-score-gets-out-of-hand. With Morris, Griffin, and Helu all getting a steady diet of carries, this unit can be very good.

It's nice that Aldrick Robinson was out there to pick up Garcon, who struggled. Of course, when you have Jordan Reed, do you really need guys outside the numbers?
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation.
GTripp0012 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-2013, 02:47 PM   #13
NYCskinfan82
Playmaker
 
NYCskinfan82's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Queens, NYC
Age: 57
Posts: 3,803
Re: Skins vs Bears postgame

Yesterdays game is what I saw when I went down to TC, we have a lot of weapons on Offense. We just need everyone to show up at the same time.
NYCskinfan82 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-2013, 03:33 PM   #14
DynamiteRave
Living Legend
 
DynamiteRave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Washington DC
Age: 39
Posts: 16,867
Re: Skins vs Bears postgame

Washington Redskins safety Brandon Meriweather faces suspension - ESPN

Well we already knew this. He'll definitely miss the Broncos game, but he may miss the Chargers as well.

Dude deserves it though. Quesiton is who will we throw back there to replace him? Rambo?
__________________
Establishment, establishment, you always know what's best.

I've been a part of this message board for 17 years. Damn I'm old.
DynamiteRave is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-2013, 03:41 PM   #15
skinsfan69
Living Legend
 
skinsfan69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Arlington, VA
Posts: 17,643
Re: Skins vs Bears postgame

Quote:
Originally Posted by DynamiteRave View Post
Washington Redskins safety Brandon Meriweather faces suspension - ESPN

Well we already knew this. He'll definitely miss the Broncos game, but he may miss the Chargers as well.

Dude deserves it though. Quesiton is who will we throw back there to replace him? Rambo?
I don't really think it matters who replaces him. Denver is going to score and score a lot. It's going to come down to whether we can keep up with them, and whether we can get a couple turnovers, and maybe another TD from the defense. I believe the defense has scored 4 times this year.
skinsfan69 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:33 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.64058 seconds with 12 queries