The 2nd Amendment Thread

[MTK]

Originally Posted by Chico23231

His vested interest is his community not being destroyed for zero reason. None. People were fed up. He had a right to be there.

Stop, you're being ridiculous. Unless he was protecting family or his own private property, a minor with a gun had zero business being there. Bad idea right from the start. And the end result (two dead) proves the point.

[sdskinsfan2001]

Originally Posted by MTK

Come on, what vested interest did a 17 year old have there?

I'm not even arguing about the fact he got off, I just can't think of any legit reason why he should have been there to begin with.

The 2 people that got killed had no good reason to be there either.

[sdskinsfan2001]

2nd rule of fight club, don't go after someone holding an AR15, you are likely to get fucking shot and killed.

[punch it in]

Originally Posted by sdskinsfan2001

The 2 people that got killed had no good reason to be there either.

Yes. They did.

[mredskins]

I think if you meet the two people Kyle mowed down, one a child sex offender, you wouldn't be all to sad for them.

I get the macro picture but at a micro level the world lost nothing here.

[punch it in]

The little racist motherfucker wouldn’t have been bothered if he lived in DC, and people were rioting, looting, and damaging property there. Neither would most of the people defending him. Because those were white people. White people who had no good reason to be there whatsoever. It didn’t start as something good. It was never something with good intentions. But i hear zero about rioting or looting or a fuckin insurrection of our government from the people who are so concerned about the buildings in Kenosha. Please.

Im not talking about you SD, i know you have a problem with that too. And had some anti trumper marched in there with a gun full vigilante id have a problem with them too.

[sdskinsfan2001]

Originally Posted by punch it in

The little racist motherfucker wouldn’t have been bothered if he lived in DC, and people were rioting, looting, and damaging property there. Neither would most of the people defending him. Because those were white people. White people who had no good reason to be there whatsoever. It didn’t start as something good. It was never something with good intentions. But i hear zero about rioting or looting or a fuckin insurrection of our government from the people who are so concerned about the buildings in Kenosha. Please.

Im not talking about you SD, i know you have a problem with that too. And had some anti trumper marched in there with a gun full vigilante id have a problem with them too.

Saw the 1st part and was about to say whoa now, saw the 2nd part and say...

[Chico23231]

Punch…lawd Jesus. I’m gonna pray for you.

[punch it in]

[Chico23231]

No his community is his business and people in the area were doing their best to defend from violent rioters. He was coordinating with others to defend local businesses that were under threat. Again, he was attacked…he is allowed to be there regardless of your opinion.

Remember the rioters had zero reason to be there, Jacob Blake was justifiable shot. Rioters should have been at home and not living out some bullshit woke riot fantasy attacking property and people.

MTK will have to disagree on this one.

[MTK]

Originally Posted by Chico23231

No his community is his business and people in the area were doing their best to defend from violent rioters. He was coordinating with others to defend local businesses that were under threat. Again, he was attacked…he is allowed to be there regardless of your opinion.

Remember the rioters had zero reason to be there, Jacob Blake was justifiable shot. Rioters should have been at home and not living out some bullshit woke riot fantasy attacking property and people.

MTK will have to disagree on this one.

If you had a kid would you let him go into that situation with a gun?

If the rioters had no reason to be there than neither did Rittenhouse. 2 wrongs don't make a right.

[SunnySide]

[nonniey]

Inaccurate things I've read or heard (on the radio) on the case since Friday.

1) Ritterhouse killed 3 black men.
2) He chased down and shot his first victim.
3) He was randomly shooting into the crowd.
4) He was a member of a white supremacist militia.
5) His mother drove him to the protest/riot.
6) He transported a gun across state lines.
7) It was illegal for him to have that gun at the riot since he was only 17.

I think it would help everyone if just facts were used when discussing this case.

[skinsfan69]

These looters, rioters and most protesters these days are just emotionally weak losers. You're going to loot and protest because of Jacob Blake? Think about what your cause is? A criminal who had warrants for sexual assault and a few other things. Wasn't he going to stab someone before the cops gave him lead?? Sound like he deserved it.

I turned on the tv the other night and people in NY were protesting. Steve Kerr and Steve Nash looked like they were going to cry. Wtf is wrong w/ people these days? People protested for voting rights, basic equal human rights and now they protest for criminals like Jacob Blake.

[Chico23231]

Originally Posted by skinsfan69

These looters, rioters and most protesters these days are just emotionally weak losers. You're going to loot and protest because of Jacob Blake? Think about what your cause is? A criminal who had warrants for sexual assault and a few other things. Wasn't he going to stab someone before the cops gave him lead?? Sound like he deserved it.

I turned on the tv the other night and people in NY were protesting. Steve Kerr and Steve Nash looked like they were going to cry. Wtf is wrong w/ people these days? People protested for voting rights, basic equal human rights and now they protest for criminals like Jacob Blake.