![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1 | |
|
Gamebreaker
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 14,603
|
Re: The stadium thread 2: New stadium boogaloo
Quote:
Interstate 95 is 3 lanes each way in that area with express lanes depending on time of day not the 8 lanes it is where it is now and even that with metro it's still a pain on game day. No Metro and what's the closest Airport to it? When they were talking Crystal City or Arlington it made sense even out by Dullas made sense but this location IMO just doesn't. Don't get me wrong the team deserves new digs but as far as location it makes no sense.
__________________
....DISCLAIMER: All of my posts/threads are my expressed typed opinion and the reader is not to assume these comments are absolute fact, law, or truth unless otherwise stated in said post/thread. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Yokohama, Japan
Posts: 4,525
|
Re: The stadium thread 2: New stadium boogaloo
Quote:
I'm curious, Dumfries got a lot of bad reactions, does Woodbridge make any difference to you guys ? It seems to be "only" 12 miles further from DC than FedEx field, and 10 miles closer than Dumfries. 30 min drives per google map.
__________________
Derz Ambassaderz in the Land of the Rising Sun. Oui Monsieur. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Hug Anne Spyder
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 20,596
|
Re: The stadium thread 2: New stadium boogaloo
Quote:
Yeah Loudoun County has the advantage of having Metro access now but it's still a hike from DC too - and I'd bet good money by the time this stadium opens (let's remember it's not a done deal - I think Dan made this move to put pressure on MD to make a better offer) there will be more commute options than 95. They are expanding the rail lines and by 2027 VRE will be running weekends so you'll have the option to take Amtrak or VRE down to Woodbridge, then run dedicated buses between the stadium and the nearest station.
__________________
Hail to the Football Team |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,575
|
Re: The stadium thread 2: New stadium boogaloo
Springfield would be the "closest" Metro station. Reagan National would be the closest airport. Richmond airport is an option and might be good because one might be heading against traffic to and from the game.
I can imagine the field day reporters would have with a Super Bowl there. The Quality Inn and Waffle House jokes would be great. Who wouldn't want to spend a weekend at an exit off 95. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Warpath Hall of Fame
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 35,307
|
Re: The stadium thread 2: New stadium boogaloo
Quote:
__________________
My pronouns: King/Your ruler He Gets Us |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,575
|
Re: The stadium thread 2: New stadium boogaloo
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Hug Anne Spyder
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 20,596
|
Re: The stadium thread 2: New stadium boogaloo
Anita's is everywhere - they have like 8 locations now. They've cornered the "you need a hot burrito when your shift starts at 5:30" market.
__________________
Hail to the Football Team |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Warpath Hall of Fame
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 35,307
|
Re: The stadium thread 2: New stadium boogaloo
The current location was terrible and the stadium was a shithole and the worst game day experience I ever had as a fan…that includes trips to the Meadowlands.
It can only get better. Dumfries was too far, Woodbridge will be better. I’m optimistic
__________________
My pronouns: King/Your ruler He Gets Us |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Gamebreaker
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 14,603
|
Re: The stadium thread 2: New stadium boogaloo
Quote:
Did it say the stadium will hold 60'000, maybe just me but isn't that kinda small?
__________________
....DISCLAIMER: All of my posts/threads are my expressed typed opinion and the reader is not to assume these comments are absolute fact, law, or truth unless otherwise stated in said post/thread. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Hug Anne Spyder
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 20,596
|
Re: The stadium thread 2: New stadium boogaloo
Quote:
__________________
Hail to the Football Team |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Parkton, MD
Posts: 5,890
|
Re: The stadium thread 2: New stadium boogaloo
The shift to Prince Dubs makes some sense. The Commanders are drawing less and less from the DM(V) and more from Virginia. A shift closer to Richmond accommodates more of the season ticket holders.
Aesthetically it is hot trash and goes against the rationale of building a stadium with a scenic city background and reaching a younger more metropolitan audience which is what I would prefer.
__________________
lex iniusta non est lex-Thomas Aquinas |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Warpath Hall of Fame
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 35,307
|
Re: The stadium thread 2: New stadium boogaloo
Quote:
__________________
My pronouns: King/Your ruler He Gets Us |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Parkton, MD
Posts: 5,890
|
Re: The stadium thread 2: New stadium boogaloo
No it wouldn't. I was referring to the shift of building stadiums back inside city limits. Heinz field, M&T etc versus suburban dumps like Fed ex, meadowlands, Foxboro
__________________
lex iniusta non est lex-Thomas Aquinas |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Hug Anne Spyder
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 20,596
|
Re: The stadium thread 2: New stadium boogaloo
Quote:
I'd like the stadium to be in DC too but it doesn't seem realistic with their footprint of what they want to build around the stadium.
__________________
Hail to the Football Team |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,575
|
Re: The stadium thread 2: New stadium boogaloo
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|