Redskins most balanced team in NFC East?

[That Guy]

Originally Posted by Mattyk72

My question is who has a better coaching staff in the East??

That's probably good for an additional 2-3 wins at least.

who has a better staff in the nfl?

that's really hard to argue against.

[Paintrain]

Originally Posted by Mattyk72

My question is who has a better coaching staff in the East??

That's probably good for an additional 2-3 wins at least.

According to ESPN Bill Parcells invented coaching and the sport of football so he by himself must be better than our entire staff.

[Giantone]

Originally Posted by Mattyk72

My question is who has a better coaching staff in the East??

That's probably good for an additional 2-3 wins at least.

Better or higher paid ?Results are what matter .

[Pocket$ $traight]

Originally Posted by Giantone

Better or higher paid ?Results are what matter .

If getting humiliated in the playoffs on your home field are the results you are looking for, give me the higher paid.

Honestly, if the G-men hadn't had 9 home games the division banner would be flying over Fed-Ex.

[Giantone]

Originally Posted by Grim21Reaper

If getting humiliated in the playoffs on your home field are the results you are looking for, give me the higher paid.

Honestly, if the G-men hadn't had 9 home games the division banner would be flying over Fed-Ex.

LOL,honestly ...no.

[#56fanatic]

Originally Posted by Giantone

Better or higher paid ?Results are what matter .

UH, has Coughlin won 3 bowls? Dont even put him in the same catagory. Our D coach has coached in a super bowl. Our O-Coordinator has won a super bowl. So, I believe we have the best coaching staff in the NFL. I may be a little crazy, but there are a lot of big silver footballs walking around Redskin park and a lot of big diamond rings! So get out of here with the over paid crap.

Go buy a #55 jersey and a #58 jersey.

[Giantone]

Originally Posted by #56fanatic

UH, has Coughlin won 3 bowls? Dont even put him in the same catagory. Our D coach has coached in a super bowl. Our O-Coordinator has won a super bowl. So, I believe we have the best coaching staff in the NFL. I may be a little crazy, but there are a lot of big silver footballs walking around Redskin park and a lot of big diamond rings! So get out of here with the over paid crap.

Go buy a #55 jersey and a #58 jersey.

Oh sorry I thought we were talking about reality here ,coaching now not in 1990.

[That Guy]

Originally Posted by Giantone

Oh sorry I thought we were talking about reality here ,coaching now not in 1990.

sorry, i thought we weren't living under a rock for the last ten years. if you think al saunders and OC and gregg williams at DC are somehow worse than what NY has, well... good luck trying to argue that.

the number of DCs, and HCs in washington is insane.

[VTSkins897]

interesting questions...

if eli manning takes it up a notch we may be 2nd behind them. i don't like bledsoe. i think the eagles will bounce back a bit but not to their NFC championship days...

it'll be a hell of a tough year.

[EXoffender]

Our defense hinges on the ability of Springs staying healthy.

[number21isabadman]

exoffender ill burn you in madden

[scowan]

Forget balance for a second, the schedule may help out the Skins in reference to the Giants. The Giants have Indy at home in week 1 followed by road trips to Philly and then Seattle, before a very early BYE in Week 4. When they face the Skins at home in Week 5, they could potentially be 0-3 or 1-2 very early. The Giants scare me more than the Cowboys in terms of balance, but they have to play that 1st place schedule, which is sweet revenge considering that they never could have won the division IMO without having 9 home games and only 7 road games last year. They exited early in the playoffs, (before the Skins) but get the tougher schedule this year.

[firstdown]

Originally Posted by scowan

Forget balance for a second, the schedule may help out the Skins in reference to the Giants. The Giants have Indy at home in week 1 followed by road trips to Philly and then Seattle, before a very early BYE in Week 4. When they face the Skins at home in Week 5, they could potentially be 0-3 or 1-2 very early. The Giants scare me more than the Cowboys in terms of balance, but they have to play that 1st place schedule, which is sweet revenge considering that they never could have won the division IMO without having 9 home games and only 7 road games last year. They exited early in the playoffs, (before the Skins) but get the tougher schedule this year.

I don't think NO would have beat the Giants if they got to play the game at home. I don't think that it made that much of a difference. Theirs not much of a difference in our schedule and the Giants. The only difference is they play Seahawks (tough team) Chicago(its hard to tell with them). We have to play Rams (we should win) and Vikes (we should win) but both teams could be very tough. All else is the same.

[firstdown]

Originally Posted by Paintrain

I was having this discussion with some friends earlier.. Make an argument that the Redskins aren't the most balanced team with the least number of question marks going into training camp. Here's my case:
Offense-Brunell is the popular punching bag, but when healthy he was very effective in '05. WR corp was upgraded, line is the best in the division, Portis is proven.

Defense-Ryan Clark and Renaldo Wynn are the only every down starters replaced because Arrington was taken out on 3rd downs and Carter/Archuleta are clear upgrades. The only true question mark is McIntosh at WLB since he is a rookie.

Cowboys question marks-OL, RB health, TO (off field questions aside, he's only played in 16 games once since '99), secondary

Eagle question marks-WR!!!, OL health, secondary, OLB

Giants question marks-QB consistency, secondary, WR consistency

The point about TO only playing in 16 games once since 99 is very very weak argument. I just hope our WR can be as injury prone as him.

year Games Yards TD's
2000 14 1451 13
2001 16 1412 16
2002 14 1300 13
2003 15 1102 9
2004 14 1200 14

He's missed 7 games out of 80 thats pretty good for as much playing times he gets and the hits he takes. I did not enclude 2005 for obvious reasons.

[scowan]

Originally Posted by firstdown

The point about TO only playing in 16 games once since 99 is very very weak argument. I just hope our WR can be as injury prone as him.

year Games Yards TD's
2000 14 1451 13
2001 16 1412 16
2002 14 1300 13
2003 15 1102 9
2004 14 1200 14

He's missed 7 games out of 80 thats pretty good for as much playing times he gets and the hits he takes. I did not enclude 2005 for obvious reasons.

Yeah, I hate T.O., but he is going to be good for 5-8 catches and 75-150 yards every game and 1-3 TDs. The question for the Cowboys will be how to keep Bledsoe upright long enough for T.O. to get some balls.