![]() |
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 | |
|
MVP
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Seattle
Age: 46
Posts: 10,069
|
Re: Best blockers: Football Scientist
Quote:
All I really have to say is I'm glad we have the linesmen we have.
__________________
"The Redskins have always suffered from chronic organizational deformities under Snyder." -Jenkins |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: ZOMGZZZ!!111
Age: 34
Posts: 1,160
|
Re: Best blockers: Football Scientist
seriously you cant rip of samuels. he hardly gave up any sacks last year. just like an article once said, when it happens, its news.
__________________
143 lbs of twisted steel and sex appeal. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Washington, DC
Age: 38
Posts: 5,688
|
Re: Best blockers: Football Scientist
That is why we have a top 3 line in the NFL. THomas is the best player on this offense in my opinion and we can see we have powerhouses to compliment him on the line. Rabach is our 'worst' player on the line but that is no problem because he is still beast(except when you are in the closing minutes of a game against the chargers. When that happens he justs starts being stupid). Doc deserves some respect. last year he was belittled pre-season like none other. He stepped up and so did the rest of the line. It is amazing that he does his job 91% of the time and samuels is doing it 95% of the time. That means 86% of the time the left side of our line is 'successful'. That is fenominal. The right side of our line isn't going to fall either having thomas and jansen. This line is absolutely amazing and we can thank bugel for that. We can see our players develop in thomas and Doc and that is because of bugez. Great job to him.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Washington, DC
Age: 38
Posts: 5,688
|
Re: Best blockers: Football Scientist
It may seem like Doc is no longer a penalty maker but he really is. He has had more holding calls last year than the previous two years combined. His false starts went down by 75% though.
I like this site for o-line stats http://snap.stats.com/stats/nflinfo/...6417&Submit=Go He dropped in sacks allowed also. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
MVP
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Seattle
Age: 46
Posts: 10,069
|
Re: Best blockers: Football Scientist
Quote:
Sorry buddy but that's not a fair comparison, especially since Samuels and Jansen go up against ferocious DE.
__________________
"The Redskins have always suffered from chronic organizational deformities under Snyder." -Jenkins |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | ||
|
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Washington, DC
Age: 38
Posts: 5,688
|
Re: Best blockers: Football Scientist
Quote:
I put up this entire post comparing positions--- Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 38
Posts: 15,994
|
Re: Best blockers: Football Scientist
Quote:
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Washington, DC
Age: 38
Posts: 5,688
|
Re: Best blockers: Football Scientist
OK, the numbers mean nothing alone so here are the stats of pro bowlers
Samuels and Jansen compared to Walter Jones Sea Orlando Pace STL Willie Anderson CIN Jonathan Ogden BAL Dock and Thomas compared to Larry Allen DAL ASS Steve Hutchinson SEA Alan Faneca PIT Will Shields KC Rabach compared to Jeff Saturday IND Lecharles Bentley NO Olin Kreutz CHI |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
The Starter
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: The Southeast
Age: 42
Posts: 2,119
|
Re: Best blockers: Football Scientist
Good stats, BSB. You're right, Thomas really does stand out - his play is almost flawless, even though the other guys are pretty good.
__________________
Your post count, reputation score, popularity ranking, VIP tag or funny signature has no bearing on how I value you as an individual. |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: VA
Age: 43
Posts: 17,620
|
Re: Best blockers: Football Scientist
this is for RUN blocking. dockery is still #5 on our OL.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: VA
Age: 43
Posts: 17,620
|
Re: Best blockers: Football Scientist
wow, hutch is pretty good
thomas too. clearly our #1.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
The Starter
Join Date: May 2006
Location: B-More, the backdoor for the Redskins Community
Age: 46
Posts: 1,087
|
Re: Best blockers: Football Scientist
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
MVP
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Seattle
Age: 46
Posts: 10,069
|
Re: Best blockers: Football Scientist
Can anyone tell me why the hell are we comparing our players? Is this a case of a solution in search of a problem?
__________________
"The Redskins have always suffered from chronic organizational deformities under Snyder." -Jenkins |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Ridgway, PA
Age: 47
Posts: 2,519
|
Re: Best blockers: Football Scientist
Quote:
__________________
"I am the best at what I do, and what I do isn't very nice" - Sean Taylor |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|