![]() |
|
|
|
|
#1 | |
|
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: Chicago @ Arizona
Quote:
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Virginia Beach
Age: 52
Posts: 5,311
|
Re: Chicago @ Arizona
Quote:
Imagine that? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: all up in your business
Posts: 2,693
|
Re: Chicago @ Arizona
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Virginia Beach
Age: 52
Posts: 5,311
|
Re: Chicago @ Arizona
Quote:
But the lockstep Brunell supporters/Gibbs-can-do-no-wrong crowd can't have it both ways. If they trust Gibbs and his ability to judge quarterbacks implicitly, the way they say "he knows best" with Mark Brunell, then they can't at the same time say that Campbell is ready to play when Joe Gibbs clearly doesn't. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Assistant Regional Mod
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Carbondale CO
Age: 46
Posts: 2,958
|
Re: Chicago @ Arizona
I was as excited as anyone about the cards, and at exactly midnight my cable (and thus my internet connection) went completely dead. There was 40 seconds on the game clock and the cards had timeouts and were driving....
I woke up expecting to hear about the upset... I wonder if Neil Rakers will have a job tomorrow.... Then I wonder if rAckers would be an upgrade from novak??
__________________
I am the brute squad. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Special Teams
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Nashville,TN
Age: 52
Posts: 474
|
Re: Chicago @ Arizona
Man Are you crazy? Lienart played in the weak ass pac 10! Campbell played in the BEST conference in college football bar none. THE SEC! Plus he excelled in college with 4, count'em,4 offensive coordinators! The talent around Matt Lienart made him and will continue to make him great! Why not give the kid a shot. ML is just another overhyped "prototypical" QB comin out of college! Campbell needs to play right now, or there won't be a future! How can Campbell be judged in the pre-season when he wasn't even out there with the starters!
HAIL from MCUSA!
__________________
BEWARE THE MIDDLE............LaRON LANDRY IS LURKING! |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: nyc
Age: 50
Posts: 2,631
|
Re: Chicago @ Arizona
Quote:
__________________
a fan. not a cheerleader. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Most Interesting Man in the World
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Age: 39
Posts: 8,606
|
Re: Chicago @ Arizona
HAHA
__________________
Vacancy |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: Chicago @ Arizona
By what logic?
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: nyc
Age: 50
Posts: 2,631
|
Re: Chicago @ Arizona
read the rest of the post. and do you remember what happened to our last "QB of the future"? no.3 QB of the Jets...
__________________
a fan. not a cheerleader. |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Uncle Phil
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
|
Re: Chicago @ Arizona
Well a.) remember that he inherited Ramsey and b.) not playing now doesn't doom Campbell to a life of failure. I just don't see the logic in the argument that all the great QBs play right away. If not, then they're ruined.
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Most Interesting Man in the World
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Age: 39
Posts: 8,606
|
Re: Chicago @ Arizona
Only thing is, JC might get frustrated, and leave. Shit I would if I were him.
__________________
Vacancy |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: nyc
Age: 50
Posts: 2,631
|
Re: Chicago @ Arizona
that's true Ramsey was inherited, but Gibbs still called Ramsey "the QB of the future" here after the 2004 season and trained him to be so. just stating the precedent.
__________________
a fan. not a cheerleader. |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Age: 49
Posts: 3,007
|
Re: Chicago @ Arizona
Quote:
You can say all you want about SEC dominance, but if you compare the two conferences, Pac-10 definitely has a decided edge in the offensive schemes over the SEC. SEC has great defense (in addition to excellent fans and atmosphere), but their offenses are not as sophisticated as those in the Pac's. Regardless of perceived conference strengths and weaknesses, let's not forget that Leinart played plenty on the big stage outside the Pac. When Matty stated this, I'm sure he didn't mean just conference play. Leinart's very first start in college was against Auburn in Auburn. Um, I think the score in his very first game (in a vaunted SEC stadium, btw) was 23-0 SC. Oh yeah, Reggie Bush and Lendale White were also freshmen who had never played a college snap until that game (both only combined for 15 rushing yards that evening). Let's not even mention Leinart's performances in the Rose Bowl against Michigan that season, Virginia Tech in the Kickoff Classic (in a hostile FedEx Field), and Oklahoma and Texas in two Natty's. I'd say he's performed on a big stage, outside of the Pac-10. Give the man some credit please! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Pro Bowl
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Virginia Beach
Age: 52
Posts: 5,311
|
Re: Chicago @ Arizona
Quote:
Offensive schemes mean nothing when the players that run them are crap. And make no misake, when Leinart was at USC, that's exactly what the rest of the PAC-10 was -- CRAP. Playing on the "big stage" is fanspeak. Nothing else. No matter what the audience is like, for every football player in each of their own atmospheres it's the same -- they feel like the world is watching. And for every Notre Dame, Auburn, and UCLA that they played, there were 10 or 20 Stanfords, U. of Arizonas, and Hawaii. Pointing this out doesn't take anything away from Leinart's abilities, just that the comparisons to him and Campbell are more even than you and Matty think. And just to echo the point (since no one responded the first time), either Campbell is ready to play or he's not. If you trust in Gibbs with his decisions regarding Brunell, then you have to trust in his infinite wisdom that for some reason, Campbell isn't what they thought he was -- and that's why he's not leading this offense right now. |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|