Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


A New Offensive Scheme? (Merged Thread)

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-05-2006, 05:51 PM   #1
Sheriff Gonna Getcha
Franchise Player
 
Sheriff Gonna Getcha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 45
Posts: 8,317
A New Offensive Scheme? (Merged Thread)

Is it just me, or did it seem like we had a different offensive coordinator? How many bubble screens did people see today? I didn't see any bubble screens. The offense looked much more conventional than it has; we threw down the middle and tried to run the ball. I likey.
Sheriff Gonna Getcha is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 11-05-2006, 05:54 PM   #2
NYCSkin
Impact Rookie
 
NYCSkin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: San Diego, CA
Age: 53
Posts: 513
Re: New Playcalling on Offense?

Agree--felt more like a Gibbs gameplan than a Saunders gameplan. Run the ball, down the middle with the TE, occasional play action deep...
NYCSkin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2006, 05:57 PM   #3
cpayne5
Playmaker
 
cpayne5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,807
Re: New Playcalling on Offense?

Daseal and I briefly discussed this at halftime...

We both thought that by Moss being out could be a good thing for Brunell. It would force him to look at someone other than 89. Without him in there, he couldn't set his sights on him every play. Did it help? Who knows. Just a thought.
cpayne5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2006, 05:58 PM   #4
Sheriff Gonna Getcha
Franchise Player
 
Sheriff Gonna Getcha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 45
Posts: 8,317
Re: New Playcalling on Offense?

Quote:
Originally Posted by cpayne5 View Post
Daseal and I briefly discussed this at halftime...

We both thought that by Moss being out could be a good thing for Brunell. It would force him to look at someone other than 89. Without him in there, he couldn't set his sights on him every play. Did it help? Who knows. Just a thought.
I hope we see more of this offense.
Sheriff Gonna Getcha is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2006, 06:01 PM   #5
3rd ID SOLDIER
Special Teams
 
3rd ID SOLDIER's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 197
Re: New Playcalling on Offense?

brandon lloyd can be a beast if brunell would throw it his way you can't just focus on santanna moss all the time.
__________________
YALL DON'T WANNA SEE ME SHINE THAT'S OKAY CAUSE I LOVE ME SOME ME BELIEVE IT!!
3rd ID SOLDIER is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2006, 06:05 PM   #6
RedskinRat
Franchise Player
 
RedskinRat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: I'm in LA, trick!
Posts: 8,700
Re: New Playcalling on Offense?

Brunell was interviewed on NFL Network and said it was due to the looks he was getting from the safeties.

Hopefully more safties will look at him like that.
RedskinRat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2006, 06:10 PM   #7
Sheriff Gonna Getcha
Franchise Player
 
Sheriff Gonna Getcha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Age: 45
Posts: 8,317
Re: New Playcalling on Offense?

Quote:
Originally Posted by RedskinRat View Post
Brunell was interviewed on NFL Network and said it was due to the looks he was getting from the safeties.

Hopefully more safties will look at him like that.
I think, perhaps incorrectly, that defenses simply haven't respected our passing game and didn't think we could throw over the middle. The Cowboys D was looking to stuff the run, and they did. Fortunately for us, we exploited their concentration on Portis and hit Thrash et al.
Sheriff Gonna Getcha is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2006, 06:34 PM   #8
hurrykaine
Impact Rookie
 
hurrykaine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Washington, D.C.
Age: 51
Posts: 762
Re: New Playcalling on Offense?

The playcalling in the first two series had an Al Saunders stamp on it. However, on the redzone possession in the first quarter, the 7 straight runs that failed to punch the ball into the endzone reeked of Gibbs playcalling. The playcalling at the end on the last series before Novak's botched FG was also Gibbs playcalling. He needs to surrender playcalling to Al, period.
hurrykaine is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2006, 06:55 PM   #9
tdSKINS1
Impact Rookie
 
tdSKINS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Altavista Virginia
Age: 35
Posts: 712
Re: New Playcalling on Offense?

yea but santana wasn't in the game too , thats probably one reason
__________________
#21 Never Forget
HOKIES!
tdSKINS1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2006, 06:55 PM   #10
Stacks42
Impact Rookie
 
Stacks42's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Arlington Va.
Age: 48
Posts: 835
Re: New Playcalling on Offense?

Czaben said the same thing on the comcast post game show, looked like Gibbs took the reigns back today
__________________
The NEXT special teams coordinator
Stacks42 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2006, 08:01 PM   #11
4mrusmc
Impact Rookie
 
4mrusmc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Age: 55
Posts: 559
Re: New Playcalling on Offense?

The redzone play needs to get better. I would of liked to see my man Sellers get one of those carries there on the 1 yard line.
4mrusmc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2006, 08:01 PM   #12
MTK
\m/
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,518
Re: New Playcalling on Offense?

The offense definitely had a Gibbs flavor today. If he really did take back control of the offense I say stick with it.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2006, 08:21 PM   #13
70Chip
Playmaker
 
70Chip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Manassas
Age: 53
Posts: 3,048
Re: New Playcalling on Offense?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattyk72 View Post
The offense definitely had a Gibbs flavor today. If he really did take back control of the offense I say stick with it.
True or False.

1. Today Gibbs was holding a laminated play sheet.

2. Gibbs held no laminated playsheet the previous 7 games.

3. Offensive Linemen pulling like crazy today.

4. Most called pass play today was play-action 7 step drop.


In fairness to Al, the two touchdowns were obviously his misdirection plays. But, they worked because they were anomalies. For mis-direction to work, the defense has to think your likely to do the other. Ellis got caught sneaking inside on the toss to Portis because of the 12 Gibbs gut plays that came before. The Cooley TD was bootleg action with Brunell rolling out. The entire Dallas defense was following Portis or Betts or whoever the fake was to. Beautiful.

I think they should let Saunders design the gameplan and then let Gibbs call most of the plays. (Joe will end up using about 3 run plays out of 30) If Saunders has something he likes he can do an Arnold Horshack impression and try to talk Joe into it. OOOH, OOOH, OOOH. That way we get the best of both worlds.
__________________
This Monkey's Gone to Heaven
70Chip is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2006, 08:24 PM   #14
MTK
\m/
 
MTK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: NY
Age: 52
Posts: 99,518
Re: New Playcalling on Offense?

Yeah I noticed him holding what looked like a play call sheet.
__________________
Support The Warpath! | Warpath Shop
MTK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2006, 08:25 PM   #15
GTripp0012
Living Legend
 
GTripp0012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 36
Posts: 15,994
Re: New Playcalling on Offense?

Quote:
Originally Posted by cpayne5 View Post
Daseal and I briefly discussed this at halftime...

We both thought that by Moss being out could be a good thing for Brunell. It would force him to look at someone other than 89. Without him in there, he couldn't set his sights on him every play. Did it help? Who knows. Just a thought.
I think you call the same plays with 89 in the lineup as you did today. The offense would only improve.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation.
GTripp0012 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:52 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 3.40345 seconds with 12 queries