Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Jason Campbell vs. Vick

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-01-2006, 03:40 PM   #1
hesscl34
Registered User
 
hesscl34's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Germantown, MD
Posts: 2,782
Re: Jason Campbell vs. Vick

For the love of God!!! I'm not doing ANYTHING different from anyone else – EXCEPT I’m not using racial or sexist slurs!!!!!!!

I really want to tell you to read more, but then I might hurt your feelings again and we'll just continue......
hesscl34 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2006, 03:42 PM   #2
hooskins
Most Interesting Man in the World
 
hooskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Age: 39
Posts: 8,606
Re: Jason Campbell vs. Vick

Quote:
Originally Posted by hesscl34 View Post
For the love of God!!! I'm not doing ANYTHING different from anyone else – EXCEPT I’m not using racial or sexist slurs!!!!!!!

I really want to tell you to read more, but then I might hurt your feelings again and we'll just continue......
Again another cheap shot, that is not even close to being a valid point.
__________________
Vacancy
hooskins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2006, 03:45 PM   #3
hesscl34
Registered User
 
hesscl34's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Germantown, MD
Posts: 2,782
Re: Jason Campbell vs. Vick

I'm trying to communicate and I know cheap shots is something you can understand....

Now back to Football kids....
hesscl34 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2006, 03:48 PM   #4
GTripp0012
Living Legend
 
GTripp0012's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Evanston, IL
Age: 38
Posts: 15,994
Re: Jason Campbell vs. Vick

I just feel that Vick is a QB who needs to drop back 40+ times a game to really make an impact with both his running and passing. If a game is called that way, then the running backs simply don't have the kind of outcome on a game they need to make THAT offense successful. I'm starting to feel that there are better fits for him than Atlanta. One that comes to mind would be Oakland. A team that has no running game, a good, borderline great defense, and an offensive line that consistently has pressure gaffes.

I believe that an offense will never be great with Vick, but he could take a horrible offense and make it decent no matter who is around him.
__________________
according to a source with knowledge of the situation.
GTripp0012 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2006, 03:51 PM   #5
hooskins
Most Interesting Man in the World
 
hooskins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Chantilly, VA
Age: 39
Posts: 8,606
Re: Jason Campbell vs. Vick

Quote:
Originally Posted by GTripp0012 View Post
I just feel that Vick is a QB who needs to drop back 40+ times a game to really make an impact with both his running and passing. If a game is called that way, then the running backs simply don't have the kind of outcome on a game they need to make THAT offense successful. I'm starting to feel that there are better fits for him than Atlanta. One that comes to mind would be Oakland. A team that has no running game, a good, borderline great defense, and an offensive line that consistently has pressure gaffes.

I believe that an offense will never be great with Vick, but he could take a horrible offense and make it decent no matter who is around him.
Do you ever see Vick getting a ring? I personally don't because of what you have just mentioned.
__________________
Vacancy
hooskins is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:40 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.22422 seconds with 11 queries