Commanders Post at The Warpath  

Home | Forums | Donate | Shop




Go Back   Commanders Post at The Warpath > Commanders Football > Locker Room Main Forum

Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion


Redskins turned down Al Wilson!! plus great offer

Locker Room Main Forum


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-07-2007, 12:05 AM   #1
Bbaker24
Camp Scrub
 
Bbaker24's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 38
Redskins turned down Al Wilson!! plus great offer

According to WashingtonPost.com
The skins would've got:
Al Wilson
1st Rounder
3rd Rounder
possibly 2nd Rounder
broncos get
1st Rounder
it says we turned it down so we could have fletcher
no offense but Al Wilson is considered one of the top MLB's out their im suprised
link:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn...030601190.html
Bbaker24 is offline   Reply With Quote

Advertisements
Old 03-07-2007, 12:08 AM   #2
Big C
Mr. Brightside
 
Big C's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Leesburg, VA
Age: 38
Posts: 4,453
Re: Redskins turned down Al Wilson!! plus great offer

if we could get a mlb who already knows the system who is just as good in free agency and keep our #6 pick then why not just go that way? we did the right thing
__________________
"I don't care what nobody say I'm a be me, stay hood stay real, cause I'm out here grindin'" -Joe Gibbs
Big C is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2007, 12:09 AM   #3
jdlea
Playmaker
 
jdlea's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Arlington, VA
Age: 40
Posts: 3,109
Re: Redskins turned down Al Wilson!! plus great offer

Quote:
Originally Posted by Big C View Post
if we could get a mlb who already knows the system who is just as good in free agency and keep our #6 pick then why not just go that way?
Cause the picks would have been nice too. I think they did the wrong thing by turning that one down. Al Wilson is a monster. Also, if they were willing to give up Wilson, why don't they just send Bly over?
jdlea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2007, 12:12 AM   #4
SmootSmack
Uncle Phil
 
SmootSmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 45,256
Re: Redskins turned down Al Wilson!! plus great offer

Al Wilson has supposedly been mentioned in trade talks with the Panthers as well. I wonder why he's on the block
__________________
You're So Vain...You Probably Think This Sig Is About You
SmootSmack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2007, 12:12 AM   #5
Dirtbag59
Naega jeil jal naga
 
Dirtbag59's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Atlanta, Georgia From: Silver Spring, Maryland
Age: 39
Posts: 14,750
Re: Redskins turned down Al Wilson!! plus great offer

Quote:
Originally Posted by jdlea View Post
Also, if they were willing to give up Wilson, why don't they just send Bly over?

Exactly
__________________
"It's nice to be important, but its more important to be nice."
- Scooter

"I feel like Dirtbag has been slowly and methodically trolling the board for a month or so now."
- FRPLG
Dirtbag59 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2007, 12:16 AM   #6
Big C
Mr. Brightside
 
Big C's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Leesburg, VA
Age: 38
Posts: 4,453
Re: Redskins turned down Al Wilson!! plus great offer

Quote:
Originally Posted by jdlea View Post
Cause the picks would have been nice too. I think they did the wrong thing by turning that one down. Al Wilson is a monster. Also, if they were willing to give up Wilson, why don't they just send Bly over?
u dont do the deal because there is a player u can get at the same position without giving up that pick. if we want to get rid of the pick we can do so easily and im sure better offers will arrive, offers that include players that are in a position that we need that we cant get through free agency, i.e. cornerback.
__________________
"I don't care what nobody say I'm a be me, stay hood stay real, cause I'm out here grindin'" -Joe Gibbs
Big C is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2007, 12:21 AM   #7
jdlea
Playmaker
 
jdlea's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Arlington, VA
Age: 40
Posts: 3,109
Re: Redskins turned down Al Wilson!! plus great offer

Quote:
Originally Posted by Big C View Post
u dont do the deal because there is a player u can get at the same position without giving up that pick. if we want to get rid of the pick we can do so easily and im sure better offers will arrive, offers that include players that are in a position that we need that we cant get through free agency, i.e. cornerback.
I said they should just change Wilson to Bly, but anyway, Al Wilson would have been a long term answer at MLB, not a stopgap. Now, I love London Fletcher, but the guy's on the downside. If he plays more than 3 years here I'll be shocked. Al Wilson is still relatively young at 29. I think he's got about 5 productive years left. However, it doesn't matter cause it's not gonna happen. However, they should just replace Wilson with Bly and the deal should get done.
jdlea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2007, 12:24 AM   #8
Smurf85
Special Teams
 
Smurf85's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 123
Re: Redskins turned down Al Wilson!! plus great offer

We might have turned that down,but there might be a new trade in works.

Quote:
Posted at 5:51 PM ET, 03/ 6/2007

More Dre Bly

As I've been writing since Sunday, don't rule out a Dre Bly trade. I continue to hear this cat is pushing to get to DC bigtime, and it seems like the trade talks are still on. The stuff I hear just won't go away and I am beginning to think it is going to happen.

Denver does not want to give Bly an extension, but the Redskins will. I heard today that these trade talks actually stretch back to before the combine and have taken on various forms (including the Springs for Bly proposed swap that the Broncos killed because the Skins wanted cap relief, as reported first on this lil blog Sunday).

So now the Broncos are bringing in corner David Macklin and are open to dealing Bly. And the Broncos have a hardcore interest in Washington's sixth overall pick, numerous league sources have told me, and the Redskins remain very open to dealing it. As I've reported previously, the Redskins are also deadset on trying to get that third-round pick back from Denver they lost in the Duckett deal.

And, trust me, these teams have been talking about swapping draft picks for weeks, I hear on very good authority, and have already had the parameters of several potential deals in place. So, I still think there is a very good chance we see Bly come to DC, along with Denver's first-round pick, and second- and/or third-round pick, plus maybe a conditional late round pick, in exchange for the 6th overall pick.

In that scenario, the Skins would make a big play for the 19-year-old defensive lineman from Louisville, Okoye, to address that need, and get young offensive and defensive linemen with the additional picks (I hear they love this kid by the way). Also, Springs would likely get traded for picks (don't rule out him landing in Detroit, Arizona or even Baltimore) and Bly gets his money in Washington.

And trust me, I am not going to put everything I know out there right now, but the Skins could make this happen cap-wise, with little problem.
Redskins Insider
Smurf85 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2007, 12:29 AM   #9
RMSkins
The Starter
 
RMSkins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Harrisburg, PA
Age: 36
Posts: 1,066
Re: Redskins turned down Al Wilson!! plus great offer

Al Wilson would've been nice but Fletcher already knows the system and fits in well.
RMSkins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2007, 12:30 AM   #10
SouperMeister
Playmaker
 
SouperMeister's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Leesburg, VA
Age: 60
Posts: 3,419
Re: Redskins turned down Al Wilson!! plus great offer

I'm tired of dealing with Denver. Something tells me that they're going to come out with our 2008 2nd round pick if we go down that road again.
SouperMeister is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2007, 12:32 AM   #11
Big C
Mr. Brightside
 
Big C's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Leesburg, VA
Age: 38
Posts: 4,453
Re: Redskins turned down Al Wilson!! plus great offer

Quote:
Originally Posted by jdlea View Post
I said they should just change Wilson to Bly, but anyway, Al Wilson would have been a long term answer at MLB, not a stopgap. Now, I love London Fletcher, but the guy's on the downside. If he plays more than 3 years here I'll be shocked. Al Wilson is still relatively young at 29. I think he's got about 5 productive years left. However, it doesn't matter cause it's not gonna happen. However, they should just replace Wilson with Bly and the deal should get done.
wilson is only 2 years younger, i dont think that makes a long term answer. he will be 30 at the start of the season and fletcher will be 32
__________________
"I don't care what nobody say I'm a be me, stay hood stay real, cause I'm out here grindin'" -Joe Gibbs
Big C is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2007, 12:36 AM   #12
jdlea
Playmaker
 
jdlea's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Arlington, VA
Age: 40
Posts: 3,109
Re: Redskins turned down Al Wilson!! plus great offer

Quote:
Originally Posted by Big C View Post
wilson is only 2 years younger, i dont think that makes a long term answer. he will be 30 at the start of the season and fletcher will be 32
Okay, but I still think they should make the same trade for Bly, which was actually the poorly illustrated main point of my first post. I think Al Wilson would have been nice, but Bly would be better. If they could have gotten Wilson instead of Flet I would have been happy. However, it didn't happen and I'm happy this way too.
jdlea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2007, 12:38 AM   #13
That Guy
Living Legend
 
That Guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: VA
Age: 42
Posts: 17,553
Re: Redskins turned down Al Wilson!! plus great offer

al wilson is good, but fletcher + #6 is better than wilson and #21.

the broncos are making decent offers though.
That Guy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2007, 12:52 AM   #14
holcknowsbest
Special Teams
 
holcknowsbest's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 240
Re: Redskins turned down Al Wilson!! plus great offer

we want dre and springs at corner next year trust me! i am telling you that it couldnt get any better than that for us...it also might give arch a chance to be more of a linebacker at safety if we have two guys who can cover the way those two do...carlos rodgers is a bust people...cant play a lick you tell me a good game he had and i will show you 5 bad ones, corners need to be consistent and he isnt.

there are so many scenarios out there but the more i look at it the more i say trade back in the draft to get more picks and or players via trade. i mean its obvious that we dont have the sack to make the 6th selection in the draft, but that might not be a bad thing all and all.
holcknowsbest is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-07-2007, 12:54 AM   #15
holcknowsbest
Special Teams
 
holcknowsbest's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 240
Re: Redskins turned down Al Wilson!! plus great offer

Arch and Rodgers are in the same boat in my book, its just nobody pointed out all of rodgers mistakes cause he is young and arch had a big pay day last year. but rodgers is in the same boat as arch if you ask me.
holcknowsbest is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:35 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
We have no official affiliation with the Washington Commanders or the NFL.
Page generated in 0.78578 seconds with 12 queries