![]() |
|
|||||||
| Locker Room Main Forum Commanders Football & NFL discussion |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
MVP
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: lancaster,pa
Age: 64
Posts: 10,672
|
Re: JC et al still under the radar...
hey woody, welcome to the board
__________________
"It's better to be quiet and thought a fool than to open ones mouth and remove all doubt." courtesy of 53fan |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Camp Scrub
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Rockville, MD
Posts: 27
|
Re: JC et al still under the radar...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 4,540
|
Re: JC et al still under the radar...
Attempting to put bias aside, I think he has IT, based on what we've seen thus far. He's drawn some praise from scouts & media along the way, but never been touted as a big time qb. I even remember Peter King saying how good he looked in workouts before the draft in 05 & how surprised he was that more coaches & scouts didn't rank him higher.
Think about our recent past, can you say that you feel any better about a Skins qb since Brad Johnson? |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
MVP
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: lancaster,pa
Age: 64
Posts: 10,672
|
Re: JC et al still under the radar...
Quote:
__________________
"It's better to be quiet and thought a fool than to open ones mouth and remove all doubt." courtesy of 53fan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 4,540
|
Re: JC et al still under the radar...
Quote:
If you remember his first pass was a long bomb to Loyd, who let it go right through his hands. It was symbolic of the kind of season it was for the offense, the whole team was out of sync. It took half a season to get the running game going. That said, JC did not have one game where he looked totally lost & made big mistakes. He led the team back against Philly & the g-men & although we didn't win those games, I think he showed great resolve in getting a losing team back in the fight. Could he suck this year? Sure, but I don't see any reason to think he would. What is his major flaw? I'd say just his lack of experience. He doesn't hold the ball too long, he can make virtually every throw & his accuracy will improve. He stays in the pocket & isn't easily rattled by pressure, but he can run & is a big guy who can take a hit. I know, I know, we're always optimistic in the offseason, but this isn't the ole ball coach & his draft pick. This is Joe Gibbs & his. He managed to get us to the playoffs w/brunell, I feel more of the same w/JC in the future. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Contains football related knowledge
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Second Star On The Right
Age: 63
Posts: 10,401
|
Re: JC et al still under the radar...
If they were being honest with themselves, many would say that they felt this way about Ramsey (I among them). I loved what I saw of JC last year AND the buzz that seems to surround him. With Ramsey, I really liked what I saw but am not sure if there was quite the same "Wow" factor we are getting from some of the current players for JC. I think all the players liked Ramsey, thought he had a great arm, and admired his work ethic - I just don't remember quotes and compliments on his accuracy and ability to anticipate.
Hopefully, this will not be a replay of the Ramsey era - high hopes and disappointment. I see significant differences between the two - but I also see some similarities. For the time I am simply crossing my fingers and cautiously hopeful.
__________________
Strap it up, hold onto the ball, and let’s go. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Special Teams
Join Date: Jun 2006
Age: 69
Posts: 322
|
Re: JC et al still under the radar...
If arm strength was what you looked at to guess the success of a QB, Ramsey was your man. I have always felt this is part of the equation, but greatly overrated. As we saw, Ramsey was very "statue"-esque and had no concept of a "touch" pass.
The Redskins have already talked about the fact that JC is getting the ball out quicker than last year, and I saw a better touch pass from him last year than I ever saw from Ramsey. When you throw in the fact that he called a winning play last year when his headset went out, you know something's right. Finally, if the defense plays better than last year, so that the offense doesn't have time for a three-course dinner before going back onto the playing field, JC and the offense should be able to maintain a rhythm during the games. Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Manassas
Age: 55
Posts: 3,048
|
Re: JC et al still under the radar...
I think he stole this from one of my posts:
"The teams to watch in 2007 that scored less than 20 points per game last season (and missed the playoffs) are the 49ers, Cardinals, Broncos and Redskins. They all averaged in the 18- or 19-point area and should be better on offense. If they can get three or four points better, they will be right in the playoff hunt. " I look for the Redskins to be in the 24 to 25 ppg range this season. This would make all the difference. Also, I would point out that while the Colts were poor defensively in the reg season, they played great defense in the post. Update: We were discussing this here: http://www.redskinswarpath.com/locke...ghlight=points
__________________
This Monkey's Gone to Heaven |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Detroit area
Posts: 4,153
|
Re: JC et al still under the radar...
Just saying don't get too jacked up. Ever since we brought in Marty, we have had many reasons to be jacked up, whether it was a good draft, kickass FA signings, etc. I am just saying take one game at a time sort of approach. It gets frustrating starting off really geared up only to have your air let out of your tires before midseason. The preseason publications have never been friendly to us in recent years, but they have been pretty close to reality in terms of the predicted outcome. The Washington Post forum was always a trip, you always had about a dozen "homer" always saying 12-4, or 11-5 and a SB automatically. I was like that for a bit, but this is ridiculous. On paper we have a kick ass team and lately we have been in a weakend division and we still can't sweep the Cowboys or Giants, let alone get a win.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
MVP
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: lancaster,pa
Age: 64
Posts: 10,672
|
Re: JC et al still under the radar...
just remember, everyone is a pro bowler this time of year
__________________
"It's better to be quiet and thought a fool than to open ones mouth and remove all doubt." courtesy of 53fan |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Richmond
Posts: 3,261
|
Re: JC et al still under the radar...
Heres a real short nfl.com artical saying one of the may contributors that has keeped us from being a top tier team agian is our inconsistency at QB, and that JC might be the fix. I like to see a little presure under Jason, give him more reasons to keep up the hard work
NFL.com - NFL News plus as a bonus theres a quick mention of Patrick Ramsey!!! |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
Playmaker
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Richmond
Posts: 3,261
|
Re: JC et al still under the radar...
JC is starting to show up on the radar a little more:
NFL.com - NFL News I dont get what the Eli Manning Big City Presure Award is. Doesnt Eli suck? I think this is a nice little comparison chart of new QBs (looks much better in link) Player Team Starts Att/Comp Percent Yards TD/INT Jason Campbell Washington 7 110/207 53.1 1,297 10/6 Brodie Croyle Kansas City 0 3/7 42.9 23 0/2 Jay Cutler Denver 5 81/137 59.1 1,001 9/5 Tarvaris Jackson Minnesota 2 47/81 58 475 2/4 Matt Leinart Arizona 11 214/371 56.8 2,547 11/12 Matt Schaub Houston 2 84/161 52.2 1,033 6/6 Tony Homo Dallas 10 220/337 65.3 2,903 19/13 Vince Young Tennessee 13 183/357 51.5 2,199 12/13 Brady Quinn Cleveland 0 0 0 0 0/0 Jamarcus Russell Oakland 0 0 0 0 0/0 |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Living Legend
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: chesapeake, va
Age: 62
Posts: 15,817
|
Re: JC et al still under the radar...
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|